Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen transformations in copper-contaminated soils and effects of lime and compost application on soil resiliency

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 A neutral and an acidic soil were treated with different doses (0–3,000 mg Cu kg–1 soil as CuSO4) of copper. The percentages of inhibition of nitrification in both soils varied from 5 to 97%, but for the N mineralization these percentages varied from 8 to 65%. The toxic effect of Cu for basal nitrification and N mineralization was assessed as critical. Nitrification was more sensitive than ammonification to copper toxicity. It appears that an ecological dose of inhibition for nitrification and N mineralization higher than 10% is suitable as an indicator for Cu contamination. Soil resiliency assessed by N mineralization in the lime treatments varied from 11 to 154% in the sandy soil and from 70 to 168% in the sandy loam soil. A combined application of lime and compost significantly increased soil resiliency. The percentage increase varied from 904 to 1,390% in the sandy soil and from 767 to 2,230% in the sandy loam soil. It appears that compost was a powerful agent for recovering the soil fertility of Cu-contaminated soils as assessed by N transformation. The acidic sandy soil showed a lower capacity for recovery after Cu toxicity stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 27 February 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kostov, O., Van Cleemput, O. Nitrogen transformations in copper-contaminated soils and effects of lime and compost application on soil resiliency. Biol Fertil Soils 33, 10–16 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000265

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740000265

Navigation