Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Climatic changes associated with a global “2°C-stabilization” scenario simulated by the ECHAM5/MPI-OM coupled climate model

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, concentrations of the well-mixed greenhouse gases as well as the anthropogenic sulphate aerosol load and stratospheric ozone concentrations are prescribed to the ECHAM5/MPI-OM coupled climate model so that the simulated global warming does not exceed 2°C relative to pre-industrial times. The climatic changes associated with this so-called “2°C-stabilization” scenario are assessed in further detail, considering a variety of meteorological and oceanic variables. The climatic changes associated with such a relatively weak climate forcing supplement the recently published fourth assessment report by the IPCC in that such a stabilization scenario can only be achieved by mitigation initiatives. Also, the impact of the anthropogenic sulphate aerosol load and stratospheric ozone concentrations on the simulated climatic changes is investigated. For this particular climate model, the 2°C-stabilization scenario is characterized by the following atmospheric concentrations of the well-mixed greenhouse gases: 418 ppm (CO2), 2,026 ppb (CH4), and 331 ppb (N2O), 786 ppt (CFC-11) and 486 ppt (CFC-12), respectively. These greenhouse gas concentrations correspond to those for 2020 according to the SRES A1B scenario. At the same time, the anthropogenic sulphate aerosol load and stratospheric ozone concentrations are changed to the level in 2100 (again, according to the SRES A1B scenario), with a global anthropogenic sulphur dioxide emission of 28 TgS/year leading to a global anthropogenic sulphate aerosol load of 0.23 TgS. The future changes in climate associated with the 2°C-stabilization scenario show many of the typical features of other climate change scenarios, including those associated with stronger climatic forcings. That are a pronounced warming, particularly at high latitudes accompanied by a marked reduction of the sea-ice cover, a substantial increase in precipitation in the tropics as well as at mid- and high latitudes in both hemispheres but a marked reduction in the subtropics, a significant strengthening of the meridional temperature gradient between the tropical upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere in the extratropics accompanied by a pronounced intensification of the westerly winds in the lower stratosphere, and a strengthening of the westerly winds in the Southern Hemisphere extratropics throughout the troposphere. The magnitudes of these changes, however, are somewhat weaker than for the scenarios associated with stronger global warming due to stronger climatic forcings, such as the SRES A1B scenario. Some of the climatic changes associated with the 2°C-stabilization are relatively strong with respect to the magnitude of the simulated global warming, i.e., the pronounced warming and sea-ice reduction in the Arctic region, the strengthening of the meridional temperature gradient at the northern high latitudes and the general increase in precipitation. Other climatic changes, i.e., the El Niño like warming pattern in the tropical Pacific Ocean and the corresponding changes in the distribution of precipitation in the tropics and in the Southern Oscillation, are not as markedly pronounced as for the scenarios with a stronger global warming. A higher anthropogenic sulphate aerosol load (for 2030 as compared to the level in 2100 according to the SRES A1B scenario) generally weakens the future changes in climate, particularly for precipitation. The most pronounced effects occur in the Northern Hemisphere and in the tropics, where also the main sources of anthropogenic sulphate aerosols are located.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACIA (2005) Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht B (1989) Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science 245:1227–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer D, Martin P, Buffett B, Brovkin V, Rahmsdorf S, Ganopolski A (2004) The importance of ocean temperature to biogeochemistry. Earth Planet Sci Lett 222:333–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzel O, Fichefet T, Goosse H (2006) Sea ice evolution over the 20th and 21st centuries as simulated by current AOGCMs. Ocean Model 12:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher O, Lohmann U (1995) The sulphate-CCN-cloud albedo effect: a sensitivity study using two general circulation models. Tellus 47B:281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher O, Pham M, Venkatamaran C (2002) Simulation of the atmospheric sulfur cycle in the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique general circulation model. Model description, model evaluation, and global and European budgets. IPSL scientific note 23, pp 26

  • Brasseur GP, Roeckner E (2005) Impact of improved air quality on the future evolution of climate. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL023902

  • Buffett B, Archer D (2004) Global inventory of methane clathrate: sensitivity to changes in the deep ocean. Earth Planet Sci Lett 227:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins WD, 20 co-authors (2006) Radiative forcing by well-mixed greenhouse gases: estimates from climate models in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4). J Geophys Res 111. doi:10.1029/2005JD006713

  • Den Elzen M, Meinshausen M (2006) Multi-gas emission pathways for meeting the EU 2°C climate target. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakićenović NJ, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 299–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Feichter J, Roeckner E, Lohmann U, Liepert B (2004) Nonlinear aspects of the climate response to greenhouse gas and aerosol forcing. J Clim 17:2384–2398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flato GM, Participating CMIP Modelling Groups (2004) Sea-ice and its response to CO2 forcing as simulated by global climate models. Clim Dyn 23:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster PM, Taylor KE (2006) Climate forcings and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate simulations. J Clim 19:6181–6194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster PM, 14 co-authors (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Dufresne JJ, Cox PM, Rayner P (2003) How positive is the feedback between climate change and the carbon cycle? Tellus 55B:692–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F (2005) Interdecadal variability of regional climate change: implications for the development of regional climate scenarios. Meteorol Atmos Phys 89:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F (2006) Climate change hot-spots. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi:10.1029/2006GL025734

  • Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Palmer MA, Jones GS, Stott PA, Thorpe RB, Lowe JA, Johns TC, Williams KD (2004a) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31. doi:10.1029/2003GL018747

  • Gregory JM, Huybrechts P, Raper SCB (2004b) Threatened loss of the Greenland ice-sheet. Nature 428:616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M (2004) Greenhouse gas growth rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:16109–16114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, 46 co-authors (2007) Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study. Atmos Chem Phys 7:2287–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess M, Koepke P, Schult I (1998) Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: the software package OPAC. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 79:831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huybrechts P, Letreguilly A, Reeh A (1991) The Greenland ice-sheet and global warming. Glob Planet Change 89:399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannessen OM, 11 co-authors (2004) Arctic climate change: observed and modelled temperature and sea-ice variability. Tellus 56A:328–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CD, Cox P, Essery RLH, Roberts DL, Woodage MJ (2003a) Strong carbon cycle feedbacks in a climate motel with interactive CO2 and sulphate aerosols. Geophys Res Lett 30:1479–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CD, Cox P, Huntingford C (2003b) Uncertainty in climate-carbon-cycle projections associated with the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature. Tellus 55B:642–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungclaus JH, Botzet M, Haak H, Keenlyside N, Luo JJ, Latif M, Marotzke J, Mikolajewicz U, Roeckner E (2006) Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the coupled model ECHAM5/MPI-OM. J Clim 19:3952–3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiehl JT, Schneider TL, Portman RW, Solomon S (1999) Climate forcing due to tropospheric and stratospheric ozone. J Geophys Res 104:31239–31254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutti R, Meehl GA, Allen MR, Stainforth DA (2006) Constraining climate sensitivity from the seasonal cycle in surface temperature. J Clim 19:4224–4233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kushner PJ, Held IM, Delworth TL (2001) Southern Hemisphere atmospheric circulation response to global warming. J Clim 14:2238–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann U, Feichter J (2005) Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 5:715–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsland SJ, Haak H, Jungclaus JH, Latif M, Röske F (2003) The Max-Planck-Institute global ocean/sea ice model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. Ocean Model 5:91–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, Washington WM, Collins WD, Arblaster JM, Hu A, Buja LE, Strand WG, Teng H (2005) How much more global warming and sea level rise? Science 307:1769–1772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl GA, 13 co-authors (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 747–845

  • Meinshausen M (2006) What does a 2°C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. In: Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakićenović NJ, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 265–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD (2003) Pattern scaling. An examination of the accuracy of the technique of describing future climates. Clim Change 60:217–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JFB, Johns TC, Eagles M, Ingram WJ, Davis RA (1999) Towards the construction of climate change scenarios. Clim Change 41:547–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakićenović NJ, 27 co-authors (2000) IPCC special report on emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 599

  • Pham M, Boucher O, Hauglustaine D (2005) Changes in atmospheric sulphur burdens and concentrations and resulting radiative forcings under IPCC SRES emission scenarios for 1990–2100. J Geophys Res 110. doi:10.1029/2004JD005125

  • Piani C, Frame DJ, Stainforth DA, Allen MR (2005) Constraints on climate change from a multi-thousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL024452

  • Räisänen J (1998) CO2- and aerosol-induced changes in vertically integrated zonal momentum budget in a GCM experiment. J Clim 11:625–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen J (2001) CO2-induced climate change in CMIP2 experiments: quantification of agreement and role of internal variability. J Clim 14:2088–2104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen J, Hansson U, Ullerstig A, Döscher R, Graham LP, Jones C, Meier HEM, Samuelson P, Willén U (2004) European climate in the late twenty-first century: regional simulations with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios. Clim Dyn 22:13–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy V, 8 co-authors (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CS (eds) Climate Change 2001. The scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 349–416

  • Roeckner E, Bengtsson L, Feichter J, Lelieveld J, Rodhe H (1999) Transient climate change simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean CGM including the tropospheric sulfur cycle. J Clim 12:3004–3032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roeckner E, 13 co-authors (2003) The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM5. Part I: Model description. MPI-Report 349, pp 127

  • Roeckner E, Brokopf R, Esch M, Giorgetta M, Hagemann S, Kornblüh L, Manzini E, Schlese U, Schulzweida U (2006) Sensitivity of simulated climate to horizontal and vertical resolution in the ECHAM5 atmosphere model. J Clim 19:3771–3791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotstayn LD, Penner JE (2001) Indirect aerosol forcing, quasi-forcing and climate response. J Clim 14:2960–2975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber HJ, Cramer W, Nakićenović NJ, Wigley T, Yohe G (eds) (2006) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 392

  • Schulz M, 22 co-authors (2006) Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations. Atmos Chem Phys 6:5225–5246

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JB, Schellnhuber HJ, Mirza MQM (2001) Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Climate change 2001. Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 913–967

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 996

  • Trenberth KE, Shea DJ (1987) On the evolution of the Southern Oscillation. Mon Weather Rev 112:326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE, Caron JM, Stepniak DP, Worley S (2002) Evolution of El Niño-Southern Oscillation and global atmospheric surface temperatures. J Geophys Res 107. doi:10.1029/2000JD000298

  • Twomey SA (1977) The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J Atmos Sci 34:1149–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1992) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at http://www.unfccc.int

  • Wigley TML, Raper SCB (2001) Interpretation of high projections for global-mean warming. Science 293:451–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi K, Noda A (2006) Global warming patterns over the North Pacific: ENSO versus AO. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 84:221–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency under contract no. M4049-0053 and the European Commission through the ENSEMBLES project under contract no. GOCE-CT-2003-505539. I thank one of the anonymous reviewers for very helpful comments and suggestions that helped to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Danish Climate Centre, Danish Meteorological Institute, Lyngbyvej 100, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Wilhelm May

Authors
  1. Wilhelm May
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilhelm May.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

May, W. Climatic changes associated with a global “2°C-stabilization” scenario simulated by the ECHAM5/MPI-OM coupled climate model. Clim Dyn 31, 283–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0352-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0352-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation