Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are routinely used to monitor cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Analysis of planar radiographs leads to a certain degree of measurement error for the cup anteversion (AV). With the current study, we wanted to clarify whether planar radiography can be used for accurate evaluation of the THA position.

Materials and methods

The postoperative orientation of pelvic implants in 42 patients was analyzed according to five documented mathematical algorithms using planar radiographs. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) pelvis scans were available for all patients. A CT-based navigation system was used to determine AV.

Results

The comparison showed that all five formulas presented substantial variations for the AV angle. Of these, Widmer’s algorithm presented the smallest difference compared to the CT. Misinterpretation of postoperative planar radiographs is a common problem in THA.

Conclusion

Planar radiographs are too imprecise for exact evaluation of the correct cup AV after THA. CT-based analysis may be necessary if exact values are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackland MK, Bourne WB, Uhthoff HK (1986) Anteversion of the acetabular cup: measurement of angle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:409–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Busch R, Mittelmeier W (2004) Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses [in German]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 49:137–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M (2001) Computer-assisted navigated cup placement of different cup types in hip arthroplasty—a randomised controlled trial [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 139:512–517

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coventry MB, Beckenbaugh RD, Nolan DR, Ilstrup DM (1974) 2,012 total hip arthroplasties: a study of postoperative course and early complications. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:273–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Der G, Everitt BS (2002) A handbook of statistical analyses using SAS. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton

  6. DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc award: image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fackler CD, Poss R (1980) Dislocation in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop 151:169–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghelman B (1979) Radiographic localization of the acetabular component of a hip prosthesis. Radiology 130:540–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grutzner PA, Zheng G, Langlotz U, von Recum J, Nolte LP, Wentzensen A, Widmer KH, Wendl K (2004) C-arm based navigation in total hip arthroplasty—background and clinical experience. Injury 35(Suppl 1):S5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT (1998) Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 13:80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G (1988) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol 29:357–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM III, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 354:70–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Langlotz U, Lawrence J, Hu Q, Langlotz F, Nolte LP (1999) Image guided cup placement. In: Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG (eds) Computer assisted radiology and surgery. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 717–721

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmermann JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention. Clin Orthop 261:159–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McLaren RH (1973) Prosthetic hip angulation. Radiology 107:705–706

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Müller ME (1974) Total hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop 72:46–68

    Google Scholar 

  18. Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:228–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olivecrona H, Weidenhielm L, Olivecrona L, Beckman MO, Stark A, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Svensson L, Jonson T (2004) A new CT method for measuring cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 10 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 75:252–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pierchon F, Pasquier G, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Clarisse J, Duquennoy A (1994) Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty: CT study of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:45–48

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pradhan R (1999) Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:431–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grutzner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning: a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 28:198–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grutzner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) Cup placement in hip replacement surgery: a comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty—a multi-center study [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:286–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Seradge H, Nagle KR, Miller RJ (1982) Analysis of version in the acetabular cup. Clin Orthop 166:152–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tannast M (2000) The measurement of anteversion and inclination with respect to the pelvic frontal plane [in German]. M.D. Thesis, University of Bern, Medical Faculty

  26. Tannast M, Langlotz U, Siebenrock KA, Wiese M, Bernsmann K, Langlotz F (2005) Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 436:144–150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wentzensen A, Zheng G, Vock B, Langlotz U, Korber J, Nolte LP, Grutzner PA (2003) Image-based hip navigation. Int Orthop 27(Suppl 1):S43–S46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Widmer KH (2004) A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 19:387–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B (2004) Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22:815–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng G, Marx A, Langlotz U, Widmer KH, Buttaro M, Nolte LP (2002) A hybrid CT-free navigation system for total hip arthroplasty. Comput Aided Surg 7:129–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Mrs. K. Schreyer, as a native speaker, for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Axel Marx.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marx, A., von Knoch, M., Pförtner, J. et al. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 487–492 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0163-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0163-0

Keywords

Navigation