Abstract
Since 2004, article 140 of the fifth German Social Code Book (SGB V) provides the opportunity for developing and implementing models of Integrated Care (IC). The main aim of integrated care projects is to improve the quality and efficiency of health care in Germany by ameliorating the cooperation between the different sectors hospitals, ambulatory and rehabilitative care. As an example of implementing an integrated care network in the psychiatric sector, the first local network for integrated care in psychiatry in Aachen is described. It was founded in 2006 by the department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the University Hospital Aachen, the DGPPN (German Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy) and the BVDN (Professional Association of German Neuropsychiatrists). The present interface problem between the separated sectors of medical care in Germany is being solved by evidence-based therapy, coordinated treatment between the different sectors, a standardised documentation and advanced training for all clinical participants. Early diagnosis and treatment of depression are improved by integrating clinical diagnostics, acute therapy, maintenance therapy, prophylaxis of relapse and after-care within one network. By the end of 2008, 1,081 patients have been treated within the integrated care network in Aachen by 56 ambulant general practitioners and psychiatrists and by 3 local psychiatric hospitals. Currently the network is going to be enlarged by integrating the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Following this, other mental illnesses should be integrated. The aim is to create a nationwide integrated care network across all diagnostic borders of mental illnesses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) (2000) Praxisleitlinien in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (Practice guidelines in psychiatry and psychotherapy): Band 5 Behandlungsleitlinie Affektive Erkrankungen. Steinkopff, Darmstadt
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) (2005) Rahmenkonzept Integrierte Versorgung Depression (Conceptual Framework Integrated Care Depression). Nervenarzt 76:103–125
Härter M, Bermejo I, Ollenschlager G, Schneider F, Gaebel W, Hegerl U, Niebling W, Berger M (2006) Improving quality of care for depression: the German Action Programme for the implementation of evidence-based guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 18:113–119
Härter M, Bermejo I, Schneider F, Kratz S, Gaebel W, Hegerl U, Niebling W, Berger M (2003) Versorgungsleitlinien zur Diagnostik und Therapie depressiver Störungen in der hausärztlichen Praxis (Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of depressive disorders in primary care) Z ärztl Fortbild Qualsich 97 (Suppl IV):16–35
Kircher T, Bergmann F, Engels J, Kanis T, Hansen FJ, Piwernetz K, Schneider F (2006) Integrierte Versorgung Depression Aachen (Integrated Care depression Aachen) Nervenarzt 11:1399–1403
Salize HJ, Stamm K, Schubert M, Bergmann F, Härter M, Berger M, Gaebel W, Schneider F (2004) Behandlungskosten von Patienten mit Depressionsdiagnose in haus- und fachärztlicher Versorgung in Deutschland (Cost of care for depressive disorders in primary and specialized care in Germany). Psychiatr Prax 31:147–156
Schneider F, Härter M, Brand S, Sitta P, Menke R, Hammer-Filipiak U, Kudling R, Heindl A, Herold K, Frommberger U, Elmer O, Hetzel G, Witt G, Wolfersdorf M, Berger M, Gaebel W (2005) Adherence to guidelines for treatment of depression in in-patients. Br J Psychiatry 187:462–469
Schneider F, Menke R, Härter M, Salize HJ, Janssen B, Bergmann F, Berger M, Gaebel W (2005) Sind Bonussysteme auf eine leitlinienkonforme haus- und nervenärztliche Depressionsbehandlung übertragbar? (Are bonus systems applicable to guideline-oriented depression treatment provided by general practitioners and neurologists). Nervenarzt 76:308–314
Schneider F, Härter M, Kratz S, Bermejo I, Mulert C, Hegerl U, Gaebel W, Berger M (2003) Unzureichender subjektiver Behandlungsverlauf bei depressiven Patienten in der haus- und nervenärztlichen Praxis (Subjectively perceived inappropriate treatment in general and psychiatric practice). Z ärztl Fortbild Qualsich 97 (Suppl IV):57–66
Schneider F, Kratz S, Bermejo I, Menke R, Mulert C, Hegerl U, Berger M, Gaebel W, Härter M (2004) Insufficient depression treatment in outpatient settings. German Medical Science 2:Doc1
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Julia Sydnor, Angela Müller, Christina Kefalidis and Kathrin Oebel for their support.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Bröcheler declares that there are no competing interests. Dr. Bergmann received compensation as a consultant for Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, and TAD, manufacturers of antipsychotic and anti-depressive medication. Dr. Schneider received compensation as a consultant for Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, and Otsouka, manufacturers of antipsychotic medication. Dr. Schneider received compensation for scientific talks or contribution in a prize jury by Janssen-Cilag, Wyeth, and AstraZeneca, manufacturers of antipsychotic medication Dr. Schneider received funding for investigator initiated research projects from AstraZeneca, Lilly and Pfizer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bröcheler, A., Bergmann, F. & Schneider, F. Models of mental health care in psychiatry across sectoral borders. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 259 (Suppl 2), 227–232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-009-0054-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-009-0054-9