Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Size-mediated adaptive foraging: a host-selection strategy for insect parasitoids

  • Behavioral Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foraging models are useful tools for generating predictions on predator–prey interactions, such as habitat or diet choice. However, the majority of studies attempting to explain adaptive behaviour using optimality criteria have assumed that there is no trait (e.g. size) variation among individual consumers or their prey. Hymenopteran parasitoids that attack the free-living stages of their host are an ideal system for studying the influence of body size on host selection because of the wide range of adult parasitoid sizes coupled with the defensive capabilities of their hosts. We report here our application of an experimentally parameterized host selection model to investigate the influence of parasitoid body size on the range of acceptable host instar classes. Using a demographic model, we compared the efficiency of parasitoids using an optimal host selection strategy against parasitoids using an indiscriminate host selection strategy over a range of different parasitoid body sizes. Net fitness accrual of parasitoids and the impact of host instar selection on aphid recruitment were assessed on different stage-structured aphid populations. Our results demonstrate that optimal host selection allows larger parasitoids to utilize a wider range of hosts. However, smaller parasitoids receive the greatest benefits from selecting hosts optimally by utilizing a restricted range of small, poorly defended hosts when they are abundant. We argue that the correlation between flexible host selection behaviour and adult body size may be a general phenomenon that applies to the majority of hymenopteran parasitoids that attack free-living, well-defended hosts. The potential of within-generation behavioural interactions to impact between-generation dynamics in host–parasitoid populations are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckerman AP, Uriarte M, Schimitz OJ (1997) Experimental evidence for a behavioural-mediated trophic cascade in a terrestrial food chain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1735–1738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz O (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976a) Optimal foraging: attack strategy of a mantid. Am Nat 110:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976b) Optimal foraging, marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol 9:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chau A, Mackauer M (2000) Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): a preference for small pea aphids. Europ J Entomol 97:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau A, Mackauer M (2001) Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): assessing costs and benefits. Can Entomol 133:549–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Colinet H, Salin C, Boivin G (2005) Host-age and fitness related traits in a koinobiont aphid parasitoid. Ecol Entomol 30:473–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comins HN, Hassell MP (1979) The dynamics of optimally foraging predators and parasitoids. J Anim Ecol 48:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1987) Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Can J Zool 65:803–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eijs IEM, van Alphen JJM (1999) Life history correlations: why are hymenopteran parasitoids an exception? Ecol Lett 2:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J (1992) Guild structure in solitary spider-hunting wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) compared with null model predictions. Ecol Entomol 17:198–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DO, Dickman CR (1993) Body size–prey relationships in insectivorous marsupials: tests of three hypotheses. Ecology 74:1871–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell JM, Lundberg P (1994) Diet choice and predator–prey dynamics. Evol Ecol 8:407–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry GL, Dyer LA (2002) On the conditional nature of neotropical caterpillar defenses against their enemies. Ecology 83:3108–3119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerling D, Roiberg BD, Mackauer M (1990) Instar-specific defense of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum—influence on oviposition success of the parasite Aphelinus asychis. J Insect Behav 4:501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1985) Fluctuation periodicity, generation separation, and the expression of larval competition. Theor Popul Biol 28:150–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey JA, Harvey IF, Thompson DJ (1994) Flexible larval growth allows use of a range of host sizes by a parasitoid wasp. Ecology 75:1420–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry LM, Gillespie DR, Roitberg BD (2005) Does mother really know best? Oviposition preference reduces reproductive performance in the generalist parasitoid Aphidius ervi. Entomol Exp Appl 116:167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry LM, Roitberg BD, Gillespie DR (2006) Covariance of phenotypically plastic traits induces an adaptive shift in host selection behaviour. Proc R Soc B 273:2893–2899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hivonen H, Ranta E (1996) Prey to predator ratio influences efficiency of larval Aeshna juncea dragonflies. Oecologia 106:407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1959) Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol 91:385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsai I, Somogyi K, Hardy ICW (2006) Body size, host choice and sex allocation in a spider-hunting pompilid wasp. Biol J Linn Soc 87:285–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmer DJ, Luck RF (1995) Field tests of the size-fitness relationship hypothesis in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum. Ecology 76:412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouame KL, Mackauer M (1991) Influence of aphid size, age and behavior on host choice by the parasitoid wasp Ephedrus californicus—a test of host-size models. Oecologia 88:197–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Ericksen JT, Weber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the Great Tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurczewski FE, Kurczewski EJ (1968) Host records for some North American Pompilidae (Hymenoptera) with a discussion of factors in prey selection. J Kansas Entomol Soc 41:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttbeg B, Schmitz OJ (2000) Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. Am Nat 155:669–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ma BO, Abrams PA, Brassil CE (2003) Dynamic versus instantaneous models of diet choice. Am Nat 162:668–684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackauer M, Michaud JP, Volkl W (1996) Host choice by aphidiid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): host recognition, host quality, and host value. Can Entomol 128:959–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangel M, Roitberg B (1992) Behavioral stabilization of parasite–host dynamics. Theor Popul Biol 42:308–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondor EB, Roitberg BD (2000) Individual behaviour and population dynamics: lessons from aphid parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 97:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris RJ, Fellowes MDE (2002) Learning and natal host influence host preference, handling time and sex allocation behaviour in a pupal parasitoid. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky E, Nisbet RM, Murdoch WW (2008) Between discrete and continuous: consumer-resource dynamics with synchronized reproduction. Ecology 89:280–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peacor SD, Werner EE (2001) The contribution of trait-mediated indirect effects to the net effects of a predator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 27:3904–3908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, De Roos AM (2003) Adaptive habitat use in size-structured populations: linking individual behavior to population processes. Ecology 84:1129–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, Greenberg LG (1990) Optimal foraging and habitat shift of perch (Perca fluviatilis) in a resource gradient. Ecology 71:1699–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson L, Leonardsson AM, De Roos AM, Gyllenberg M, Christensen B (1998) Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structered consumer resource model. Theor Popul Biol 54:270–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petchey OL, Beckerman AP, Riede JO, Warren PH (2008) Size, foraging, and food web structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:4191–4196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G, Hardy ICW (1996) The importance of being large: parasitoid intruder-owner contests and their implications for clutch size. Anim Behav 51:1363–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theories and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger C, Coderre D, Boivin G (2000) Differential prey utilization by the generalist predator Coleomegilla maculata lengi according to prey size and species. Entomol Exp Appl 94:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg BD, Boivin G, Vet L (2001) Fitness, parasitoids and biological control: an opinion. Can Entomol 133:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1992) Quantitative genetics of body size and development time in the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera, Aphidiidae). Can J Zool 70:1102–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1993) Seasonal variation in body size and offspring sex-ratio in field populations of the parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi (Hymenoptera, Aphiidae). Oikos 68:340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira R, Mackauer M (1994) Variation in selected life-history parameters of the parasitoid wasp, Aphidius ervi—influence of host developmental stage. Entomol Exp Appl 71:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohm E, Linsenmair KE (1997) Female size affects provisioning and sex allocation in a digger wasp. Anim Behav 54:23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai JH, Wang JJ (2002) Host age choice for parasitism by Lysiphlebia mirzai and its effect on the development and reproduction of brown citrus aphid. Biocontrol 47:645–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vezina AF (1985) Empirical relationships between predator and prey size among terrestrial vertebrate predators. Oecologia 67:555–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser ME (1994) The importance of being large: the relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in females of the parasitoid Aphereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Branconidae). J Anim Ecol 63:963–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XG, Messing RH (2004) Fitness consequences of body size-dependent host species selection in a generalist ectoparasitoid. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisser WW (1994) Age-dependent foraging behavior and host-instar preference of the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus cardui. Entomol Exp Appl 70:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983) Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1525–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Roitberg lab, G. Baker, and E. Palsson for advice and support. Thanks go to J. Rosenheim and an anonymous reviewer for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge NSERC and the BC Greenhouse Growers for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada

    Lee Mason Henry, Brian O. Ma & Bernard D. Roitberg

Authors
  1. Lee Mason Henry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian O. Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard D. Roitberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Mason Henry.

Additional information

Communicated by Jay Rosenheim.

L. M. Henry and B. O. Ma contributed equally in the development of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henry, L.M., Ma, B.O. & Roitberg, B.D. Size-mediated adaptive foraging: a host-selection strategy for insect parasitoids. Oecologia 161, 433–445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1381-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1381-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation