Skip to main content
Log in

Individual variation in ontogenetic niche shifts in habitat use and movement patterns of a large estuarine predator (Carcharhinus leucas)

  • Behavioral ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ontogenetic niche shifts are common among animals, yet most studies only investigate niche shifts at the population level, which may overlook considerable differences among individuals in the timing and dynamics of these shifts. Such divergent behaviors within size-/age-classes have important implications for the roles a population—and specific age-classes—play in their respective ecosystem(s). Using acoustic telemetry, we tracked the movements of juvenile bull sharks in the Shark River Estuary of Everglades National Park, Florida, and found that sharks increased their use of marine microhabitats with age to take advantage of more abundant resources, but continued to use freshwater and estuarine microhabitats as refuges from marine predators. Within this population-level ontogenetic niche shift, however, movement patterns varied among individual sharks, with 47 % of sharks exhibiting condition-dependent habitat use and 53 % appearing risk-averse regardless of body condition. Among sharks older than age 0, fifty percent made regular movements between adjacent regions of the estuary, while the other half made less predictable movements that often featured long-term residence in specific regions. Individual differences were apparently shaped by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including individual responses to food-risk trade-offs and body condition. These differences appear to develop early in the lives of bull sharks, and persist throughout their residencies in nursery habitats. The widespread occurrence of intraspecific variation in behavior among mobile taxa suggests it is important in shaping population dynamics of at least some species, and elucidating the contexts and timing in which it develops and persists is important for understanding its role within communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton BT (2010) Climate warming and predation risk during herbivore ontogeny. Ecology 91:2811–2818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AM, Hankison SJ, Laskowski KL (2009) The repeatability of behavior: a meta-analysis. Anim Behav 77:771–783

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Svanback R, Fordyce JA, Yang LH, Davis JM, Hulsey CD, Forister ML (2003) The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am Nat 161:1–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araujo MS, Burger R, Levine JM, Novak M, Rudolf VHW, Schreiber SJ, Urban MC, Vasseur DA (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trend Ecol Evol 26:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransky JW, Dorn NJ (2013) Prey use of wetland benthivorous sunfishes: ontogenetic, interspecific and seasonal variation. Environ Biol Fish 96:1329–1340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brien ML, Webb GJ, Lang JW, McGuinness KA, Christian KA (2013) Born to be bad: agonistic behavior in hatchling saltwater crocodiles (Crocodylus porosus). Behavior 150:737–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro JI (2011) The sharks of North America. Oxford University Press, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Childers DL (2006) A synthesis of long-term research by the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program. Hydrobiologia 569:531–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW (1994) Antipredator behaviour and the asset protection principle. Behav Ecol 5:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (2000) Dynamic state variable models in ecology. Methods and applications. Oxford University Press, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrath CL, Musick JA (2010) Residency, space use and movement patterns of juvenile sandbar sharks (Carcharhinus plumbeus) within a Virginia summer nursery area. Mar Freshwater Res 61:223–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis TH, Adams DH, Burgess GH (2011) Seasonal distribution and habitat associations of bull sharks in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida: a 30-year synthesis. Trans Am Fish Soc 140:1213–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Childers DL, Lorenz JJ, Wanless HR, Hopkins TE (2005) A conceptual model of ecological interactions in the mangrove estuaries of the Florida Everglades. Wetlands 25:832–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day T, Young KA (2004) Competitive and facilitative evolutionary diversification. Bioscience 54:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roos AM, Leonardsson K, Persson L, Mittlebach GG (2002) Ontogenetic niche shifts and flexible behavior in size-structured populations. Ecol Monogr 72:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Lowe CG (2011) Habitat use, movements and site fidelity of the gray smooth-hound shark (Mustelus californicus Gill 1863) in a newly restored southern California estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 401:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR (1991) Salmon breeding behavior and life history evolution in changing environments. Ecology 72:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR, Charnov EL (1980) Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. Proc Natl Acad Sci 77:6937–6940

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gross MR, Repka J (1998) Game theory and inheritance in the conditional strategy. In: Dugatkin LA, Reeve HK (eds) Game theory and animal behavior. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 168–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubbs RD (2010) Ontogenetic shifts in movements and habitat use. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Sharks and their relatives. II. Biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 319–350

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guttridge TL, Gruber SH, Franks BR, Kessel ST, Gledhill KS, Uphill J, Krause J, Sims DW (2012) Deep danger: intera-specific predation risk influences habitat use and aggregation formation of juvenile lemon sharks Negaprion brevirostris. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 445:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hays GC, Kennedy H, Frost BW (2001) Individual variability in diel vertical migration of a marine copepod: why some individuals remain at depth when others migrate. Limnol Oceanogr 46:2050–2054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR (2007) Nursery areas as essential shark habitats: a theoretical perspective. Am Fish Soc Symp 50:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Frid A, Wirsing AJ, Dill LM, Fourqurean JW, Burkholder D, Thomson J, Bejder L (2007a) State-dependent risk-taking by green sea turtles mediates top-down effects of tiger shark intimidation in a marine ecosystem. J Anim Ecol 76:837–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Burkholder D, Hueter RE, Heithaus LI, Pratt HL Jr, Carrier JC (2007b) Spatial and temporal variation in shark communities of the Lower Florida Keys and evidence for historical population declines. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1302–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Delius BK, Wirsing AJ, Dunphy-Daly MM (2009) Physical factors influencing the distribution of a top predator in a subtropical oligotrophic estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 54:472–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heithaus MR, Frid A, Vaudo JJ, Worm B, Wirsing AJ (2010) Unraveling the ecological importance of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR (eds) Sharks and their relatives. II. Biodiversity, adaptive physiology, and conservation. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 611–637

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heupel MR, Carlson JK, Simpfendorfer CA (2007) Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337:287–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland KN, Wetherbee BM, Peterson JD, Lowe CG (1993) Movements and distribution of hammerhead shark pups on their natal grounds. Copeia 2:495–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston A, Clark A, McNamara J, Mangel M (1988) Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology. Nature 332:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry D, de Castro ALF, Mara K, Whiteneck LB, Delius B, Burgess GH, Motta P (2009) Determining shark size from forensic analysis of bite damage. Mar Biol 156:2483–2492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR (2012) Effects of an extreme temperature event on the behavior and age structure of an estuarine top predator (Carcharhinus leucas). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 447:165–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR (2014) Multi-tissue stable isotope analysis and acoustic telemetry reveal seasonal variability in the trophic interactions of juvenile bull sharks in a coastal estuary. J Anim Ecol 83:199–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2010) Size-based variation in inter-tissue comparisons of stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures of bull sharks (Carcharhinusn leucas) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:877–885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matich P, Heithaus MR, Layman CA (2011) Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J Anim Ecol 80:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG, Ballew NG, Kjelvik MK (2014) Fish behavioral types and their ecological consequences. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neer JA, Thompson BA, Carlson JK (2005) Age and growth of Carcharhinus leucas in the northern Gulf of Mexico: incorporating variability in size at birth. J Fish Biol 67:370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome SD, Etnier MA, Monson DH, Fogel ML (2009) Retrospective characterization of ontogenetic shifts in killer whale diets via δ13C and δ15N analysis of teeth. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 374:229–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1980) The status of the three ecosystem-level hypotheses regarding salt marsh estuaries: tidal subsidy, outwelling and detritus-based food chains. In: Kennedy V (ed) Estuarine perspectives. Academic Press, New York, pp 485–495

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC, Davis SM, Jacobs KJ, Barnes T, Fling HE (2005) The use of conceptual ecological models to guide ecosystem restoration in south Florida. Wetlands 25:795–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papastamatiou YP, Lowe CG, Caselle JE, Friedlander AM (2009) Scale-dependent effects of habitat on movements and path structure of reef sharks at a predator-dominated atoll. Ecology 90:996–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig DW, Rice AM, Martin RA (2007) Field and experimental evidence for competition’s role in phenotypic divergence. Evolution 61:257–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Post DM (2003) Individual variation in the timing of ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass. Ecology 84:1298–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnier T, Labonne J, Gaudin P, Bolliet V (2012) Influence of energetic status on ontogenetic niche shifts: emergence from the redd is linked to metabolic rate in brown trout. Oecologia 168:371–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt AE, Heithaus MR (2011) Does variation in movement tactics and trophic interactions among American alligators create habitat linkage? J Anim Ecol 80:786–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt AE, Heithaus MR, Mather ME, Matich P, Nifong JC, Ripple WJ, Silliman BR (2013) The roles of large top predators in coastal ecosystems: new insights from long-term ecological research. Oceanography 26:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Bell A, Johnson JC (2004) Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol Evol 19:372–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simard M, Zhang K, Rivera-Monroy VH, Ross MS, Ruiz PL, Castaneda-Moya E, Twilley RR, Rodriguez E (2006) Mapping height and biomass of mangrove forests in Everglades National Park with SRTM elevation data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpfendorfer CA, Freitas GG, Wiley TR, Heupel MR (2005) Distribution and habitat partitioning of immature bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) in a southwest Florida estuary. Estuaries 28:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Arcese P (1995) Population consequences of predation-sensitive foraging: the Serengeti wildebeest. Ecology 76:882–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skulason S, Smith TB (1995) Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 10:366–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB, Skulason S (1996) Evolutionary significance of resource polymorphisms in fishes, amphibians, and birds. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27:111–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Videler JJ, Wardle CS (1991) Fish swimming stride by stride: speed limits and endurance. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:67–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley TR, Simpfendorfer CA (2007) The ecology of elasmobranches occurring in the Everglades National Park, Florida: implications for conservation and management. Bull Mar Sci 80:171–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang LH, Rudolf VHW (2010) Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactions. Ecol Lett 13:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation to the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER Program (DBI0620409, DEB9910514, DRL0959026) and Florida International University’s Marine Sciences Program. We thank the many volunteers who assisted with shark fishing. Special thanks to Adam Rosenblatt for establishing the array of acoustic receivers and helping with downloading data, and providing analytical support. Thanks to Andrew Fritz for developing software for managing movement data and providing analytical support. Thanks also to Joel Trexler for providing logistical and analytical support for this project. Thanks to Philip Stoddard for providing comments on earlier versions of the manuscript. Research was approved by and conducted under the protocols of Florida International University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and in accordance with sampling permits EVER-2011-SCI-0031, EVER-2009-SCI-0024, and EVER-2007-SCI-0025 granted by Everglades National Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip Matich.

Additional information

Communicated by Aaron J. Wirsing.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Periodograms of FFT for: (1) a 2-year-old shark that did not exhibit periodic movements (54,802; top four panels); (2) a 1-year-old shark that exhibited periodic movements between TB and RB (54,800; middle four panels); and (3) a 2-year-old shark that exhibited periodic movements between TB and SR (4,562; bottom four panels)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matich, P., Heithaus, M.R. Individual variation in ontogenetic niche shifts in habitat use and movement patterns of a large estuarine predator (Carcharhinus leucas). Oecologia 178, 347–359 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3253-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3253-2

Keywords

Navigation