Abstract
Host–parasite theory makes predictions about the influence of host abundance, competition for hosts, and parasite transmission on parasite population size, but many of these predictions are not well tested empirically. We experimentally examined these factors in ponds using two species of freshwater mussels with parasitic larvae that infect host fishes via different infection strategies. For both species, recruitment and larval survival were positively related to host abundance, but there was no apparent minimum host threshold and positive population growth occurred when an average of one fish per mussel was present. Recruitment increased rapidly with an initial increase in host abundance but appeared to approach an asymptote at moderate host abundance. Recruitment and larval survival did not differ according to whether mussel species occurred alone or in combination, providing no evidence for competition for hosts via acquired immunity. However, larval survival of the species that attracts hosts with a lure was higher than the species that infects hosts passively, but lower survival of the latter strategy was offset by higher fecundity, which resulted in comparable recruitment between the two species. The lack of evidence for competition for hosts or host saturation suggests that mussel recruitment is limited primarily by fecundity and larval transmission efficiency. Despite the lack of a minimum host abundance threshold, high variation in recruitment in all treatments suggests that population growth at low host abundance is limited by stochasticity. These results show that host–parasite interactions in natural situations may differ substantially from predictions based on models or laboratory findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson RM, May RM (1978) Regulation and stability of host–parasite population interactions. I. Regulatory processes. J Anim Ecol 47:219–247
Arneberg P (2001) An ecological law and its macroecological consequences as revealed by studies of relationships between host densities and parasite prevalence. Ecography 24:352–358
Arneberg P, Skorping A, Grenfell B, Read AF (1998) Host densities as determinants of abundance in parasite communities. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 265:1283–1289
Barnhart CE, Haag WR, Roston W (2008) Adaptations to larval parasitism in the Unionoida. J N Am Benthol Soc 27:370–394
Brown SP, Grenfell BT (2001) An unlikely partnership: parasites, concomitant immunity and the host defence. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268:2543–2549
Cao Y, Huang J, Cummings KS, Holtrop A (2013) Modeling changes in freshwater mussel diversity in an agriculturally dominated landscape. Freshwater Sci 32:1205–1218
Carlander KD (1955) The standing crop of fish in lakes. J Fish Res Bd Can 12:543–570
Corey CA, Dowling R, Strayer DL (2006) Display behavior of Ligumia (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Northeast Nat 13:319–332
Dickenson BD, Sietman BE (2008) Recent observations of metamorphosis without parasitism in Utterbackia imbecillis. Ellipsaria 10:7–8
Dodd BJ, Barnhart MC, Rogers-Lowery CL, Fobian TB, Dimock RV Jr (2005) Cross-resistance of largemouth bass to glochidia of unionid mussels. J Parasitol 91:1064–1072
Dodd BJ, Barnhart MC, Rogers-Lowery CL, Fobian TB, Dimock RV Jr (2006) Persistence of host response against glochidia larvae in Micropterus salmoides. Fish Shellfish Immunol 21:473–484
Eads CB, Bringolf RB, Greiner RD, Bogan AE, Levine JF (2010) Fish hosts of the Carolina heelsplitter (Lasmigona decorata), a federally endangered freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Am Malacol Bull 28:151–158
Fritts AK, Fritts MW II, Peterson DL, Fox DA, Bringolf RB (2012) Critical linkage of imperiled species: Gulf sturgeon as host for purple bankclimber mussels. Freshwater Sci 31:1223–1232
Garnick E (1992) Niche breadth in parasites: an evolutionarily stable strategy model, with special reference to the protozoan parasite Leishmania. Theor Popul Biol 42:62–103
Gascho Landis AM, Mosley TL, Haag WR, Stoeckel JA (2012) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on lure display and glochidial release in a freshwater mussel. Freshwater Sci 31:775–786
Haag WR (2012) North American freshwater mussels: natural history, ecology, and conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Haag WR (2013) The role of fecundity and reproductive effort in defining life history strategies of North American freshwater mussels. Biol Rev 88:745–766
Haag WR, Warren ML Jr (1998) Role of ecological factors and reproductive strategies in structuring freshwater mussel communities. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:297–306
Haukisalmi V, Henttonen H (1990) The impact of climatic factors and host density on the long-term population dynamics of vole helminthes. Oecologia 83:309–315
Holt RD, Dobson AP, Begon M, Bowers RG, Schauberet EM (2003) Parasite establishment in host communities. Ecol Lett 6:837–842
Howerth EW, Keller AE (2006) Experimentally induced glochidiosis in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Vet Pathol 43:1004–1007
Kaiser BE (2005) The effects of glochidiosis on fish respiration. Master thesis, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO
Kaitala V, Heino M, Getz WM (1997) Host parasite dynamics and the evolution of host immunity and parasite fecundity strategies. Bull Math Biol 59:427–450
Mulcrone RS (2004) Incorporating habitat characteristics and fish hosts to predict freshwater mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) distributions in the Lake Erie drainage, Southeastern Michigan. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Neves RJ, Widlak JC (1988) Occurrence of glochidia in stream drift and on fishes of the Upper North Fork Holston River, Virginia. Am Midl Nat 119:111–120
O’Keefe KJ (2005) The evolution of virulence in pathogens with frequency-dependent transmission. J Theor Biol 233:55–64
Pederson AB, Fenton A (2007) Emphasizing the ecology in parasite community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 22:133–139
Randall RG, Kelso JRM, Minns CK (1995) Fish production in freshwaters: are rivers more productive than lakes? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:631–643
Rashleigh B, DeAngelis DL (2007) Conditions for coexistence of freshwater mussel species via partitioning of fish host resources. Ecol Model 201:171–178
Ryder JJ, Miller MR, White A, Knell RJ, Boots M (2007) Host–parasite population dynamics under combined frequency- and density-dependent transmission. Oikos 116:2017–2026
Schneider JC, Laarman PW, Gowing H (2000) Length–weight relationships. In: Schneider JC (ed) Manual of fisheries survey methods II, chap 17. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries special report 25. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor, MI (not consecutively paginated)
Smith DG (1985) Recent range expansion of the freshwater mussel Anodonta implicata and its relationship to clupeid fish restoration in the Connecticut river system. Freshwater Invertebr Biol 4:105–108
Stanko M, Krasnov BR, Morand S (2006) Relationship between host abundance and parasite distribution: inferring regulating mechanisms from census data. J Anim Ecol 75:575–583
Stern EM, Felder DL (1978) Identification of host fishes for four species of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae). Am Midl Nat 100:233–236
Strayer DL (1999) Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:468–476
Strayer DL (2008) Freshwater mussel ecology: a multifactor approach to distribution and abundance. University of California Press, Berkeley
Thrall PH, Biere A, Uyenoyama MK (1995) Frequency-dependent disease transmission and the dynamics of the Silene–Ustilago host–pathogen system. Am Nat 145:43–62
Trdan RJ, Hoeh WR (1982) Eurytopic host use by two congeneric species of freshwater mussel (Pelecypoda: Unionidae: Anodonta). Am Midl Nat 108:381–388
Vannote RL, Minshall GW (1982) Fluvial processes and local lithology controlling abundance, structure, and composition of mussel beds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:4103–4107
Acknowledgments
We thank S. Nichols and M. Hart, who assisted with all aspects of the experiments. We also thank the following people for their various contributions to the study: M. Bland, A. Commens-Carson, D. Foree, A. Gascho Landis, R. Kennedy, T. Mosley, G. Moyer, I. Palmer, N. Rankin, B. Staton, and M. Warren. This study was supported by the US Forest Service, Southern Research Station.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Steven Kohler.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haag, W.R., Stoeckel, J.A. The role of host abundance in regulating populations of freshwater mussels with parasitic larvae. Oecologia 178, 1159–1168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3310-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3310-x