Abstract
Many plants offer food rewards such as extrafloral nectar and food bodies, which have been shown to attract and retain entomophagous arthropods. In addition to food rewards, plants may possess structures that serve as shelter and/or oviposition sites for beneficial arthropods, so-called domatia. Acarodomatia are commonly used by beneficial mites for oviposition and protection from intraguild predators and adverse climatic conditions (drought). While in nature these food and shelter traits often occur in combination, they have been largely studied in isolation and we know little about how these traits interact, i.e., whether they act independently, antagonistically or synergistically. In the present study, we used citrus seedlings to test the impact of provisioning fibers (as a proxy for acarodomatia), as well as two different categories of food rewards (pollen and sugars) on oviposition and population development of phytoseiid mites. The highest oviposition and abundance of predatory mites was obtained in the treatment where the three resources were offered in combination. The combined impact of the three resources when provided jointly was up to five times higher than the summed impacts of each resource provided individually, thus providing evidence for a three-way synergy between the fibers, pollen and sugars. From an ecological point of view, our results demonstrate that combining multiple indirect defensive traits can strongly enhance the impact on the mutualistic arthropods. Differences in resource provisioning strategies in plant–phytoseiid and plant–ant mutualisms are being discussed. The presented results are of particular importance for our understanding of the functioning of defensive plant-arthropod mutualisms, as well as for the use of predatory mites in conservation- or inundative biological control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abad-Moyano R, Pina T, Dembilio O et al (2009) Survey of natural enemies of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) in citrus orchards in eastern Spain. Exp Appl Acarol 47:49–61. doi:10.1007/s10493-008-9193-3
Adar E, Inbar M, Gal S, Gan-Mor S, Palevsky E (2014) Pollen on-twine for food provisioning and oviposition of predatory mites in protected crops. Biocontrol 59:307–317. doi:10.1007/s10526-014-9563-1
Agrawal AA (2000) Mechanisms, ecological consequences and agricultural implications of tri-trophic interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:329–335
Agrawal A, Karban R (1997) Domatia mediate plant-arthropod mutualism. Nature 387:562–563. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00503.x
Biobest (2014) Biobest. http://www.biobestgroup.com/en/biobest/products/supporting-products-4465/supporting-products-4485/nutrimite-4841/. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
Bronstein JL, Alarcón R, Geber M (2006) The evolution of plant—insect mutualisms. New Phytol 172:412–428. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01864.x
Cortesero AM, Stapel JO, Lewis WJ (2000) Understanding and manipulating plant attributes to enhance biological control. Biol Control 17:35–49. doi:10.1006/bcon.1999.0777
Crawley M (2007) The R book. Wiley, New York
Delisle JF, Brodeur J, Shipp L (2015) Evaluation of various types of supplemental food for two species of predatory mites, Amblyseius swirskii and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 65:483–494. doi:10.1007/s10493-014-9862-3
Dicke M (2009) Behavioural and community ecology of plants that cry for help. Plant Cell Environ 32:654–665. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01913.x
Duarte MVA, Venzon M, Bittencourt MCDS et al (2015) Alternative food promotes broad mite control on chilli pepper plants. Biocontrol 60:817–825. doi:10.1007/s10526-015-9688-x
Ferragut F, Garcia-Marí F, Costa-Comelles J, Laborda R (1987) Influence of food and temperature on development and oviposition of Euseius stipulatus and Typhlodromus phialatus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp Appl Acarol 3:317–329. doi:10.1007/BF01193168
Ferreira JAM, Eshuis B, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (2008) Domatia reduce larval cannibalism in predatory mites. Ecol Entomol 33:374–379. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00970.x
Ferreira JAM, Cunha DFS, Pallini A et al (2011) Leaf domatia reduce intraguild predation among predatory mites. Ecol Entomol 36:435–441. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01286.x
Garcia-Marí F (2012) Plagas de los cítricos. Gestión integrada en países de clima mediterráneo. Phytoma, Valencia
Grostal P, O´Dowd DJ (1994) Plants, mites and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia 97:308–315
Hagen JS, Sawall EFJ, Tassan RL (1971) Use of food sprays to increase effectiveness of entomophagous insects. In: Proceeding Tall Timbers Conf. Ecol. Anim. Control By Habitat Manag. Feb 26–28 1970 Tallahassee, Florida, USA, pp 59–81
Heil M (2008) Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178:41–61. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x
Heil M (2015) Extrafloral nectar at the plant-insect interface: a spotlight on chemical ecology, phenotypic plasticity, and food webs. Annu Rev Entomol 60:213–232. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-020753
Heil M, Heil M (2010) Ant–plant mutualisms. Encycl Life Sci. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0022558
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2015) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J 50:346–363
Juniper B, Southwood R (1986) Insects and the plant surface. Edward Arnold, Baltimore
Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Messelink GJ, Bennison J, Alomar O et al (2014) Approaches to conserving natural enemy populations in greenhouse crops: current methods and future prospects. Biocontrol 59:377–393. doi:10.1007/s10526-014-9579-6
Mithöfer A, Boland W (2012) Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:431–450. doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854
Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Belden E (2001) Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126:535–542. doi:10.1007/s004420000556
O’Dowd DJ (1982) Pearl bodies as ant food: an ecological role for some leaf emergences of tropical plants. Biotropica 14:40. doi:10.2307/2387758
Pijnakker J, Arijs Y, de Souza A et al (2016) The use of Typha angustifolia (cattail) pollen to establish the predatory mites Amblyseius swirskii, Iphiseius degenerans, Euseius ovalis and Euseius gallicus in glasshouse crops. IOBC WPRS Bull 120:47–54
Quintana-Rodriguez E, Molina-Torres J, Ádame-Alvarez R-M et al (2015) Plant volatiles cause direct, induced and associational resistance in common bean to the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. J Ecol 103:250–260. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12340
Rasmann S, Agrawal AA (2009) Plant defense against herbivory: progress in identifying synergism, redundancy, and antagonism between resistance traits. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:473–478. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.05.005
Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (1992) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York
Rowles AD, O’Dowd DJ (2009) Leaf domatia and protection of a predatory mite Typhlodromus doreenae Schicha (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from drying humidity. Aust J Entomol 48:276–281. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.2009.00716.x
Stenberg JA, Heil M, Åhman I, Björkman C (2015) Optimizing crops for biocontrol of pests and disease. Trends Plant Sci 20:698–712. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.08.007
Tena A, Pekas A, Cano D et al (2015) Sugar provisioning maximizes the biocontrol service of parasitoids. J Appl Ecol 52:795–804. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12426
Turlings TCJ, Wäckers FL (2004) Recruitment of predators and parasitoids by herbivore-injured plants. In: Millar J, Cardé RT (eds) Advances in insect chemical ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 21–75
Urbaneja-Bernat P, Mollá O, Alonso M et al (2015) Sugars as complementary alternative food for the establishment of Nesidiocoris tenuis in greenhouse tomato. J Appl Entomol. doi:10.1111/jen.12151
van Rijn PCJ, Tanigoshi LK (1999) The contribution of extrafloral nectar to survival and reproduction of the predatory pite Iphiseius degenerans on Ricinus Communis. Exp Appl Acarol 23:281–296. doi:10.1023/A:1006240126971
van Rijn C, van Houten Y, Sabelis M (1999) Pollen improves thrips control with predatory mites. IOBC WPRS Bull 22:209–212
van Rijn PCJ, van Houten YM, Sabelis MW (2002) How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 83:2664–2679. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2664:HPBFPF]2.0.CO;2
Wäckers FL (2005) Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources. In: Wäckers FL, Van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J (eds) Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: a protective mutualism and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–74
Wäckers FL, Bonifay C (2004) How to be sweet? Extrafloral nectar allocation by Gossypium hirsutum fits optimal defense theory predictions. Ecology 85:1512–1518. doi:10.1890/03-0422
Walter DE (1996) Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annu Rev Entomol 41:101–114. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000533
Walter DE, O’Dowd DJ (1992) Leaves with domatia have more mites. Ecology 73:1514–1518. doi:10.2307/1940694
Weber MG, Clement WL, Donoghue MJ, Agrawal A (2012) Phylogenetic and experimental tests of interactions among mutualistic plant defense traits in Viburnum (Adoxaceae). Am Nat 180:450–463. doi:10.1086/667584
Acknowledgements
We thank Nancy Lenaerts for help with sampling.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
FW originally formulated the idea, FW and AP conceived and designed the experiments and developed the methodology, AP performed the experiments and analysed the data, FW and AP wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This study was funded by Biobest Belgium NV. FW and AP receive salaries from Biobest Belgium.
Additional information
Communicated by Moshe Inbar.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pekas, A., Wäckers, F.L. Multiple resource supplements synergistically enhance predatory mite populations. Oecologia 184, 479–484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3877-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3877-5