Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy

  • Article
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nested-subset hypothesis of Patterson and Atmar states that species composition on islands with less species richness is a proper subset of those on islands with greater species richness. The sum of species absences, referred to as gaps, was suggested as a metric for nestedness, and null models have been used to test whether or not island species exhibited nestedness. Simberloff and Martin stated that finding examples of non-nested faunas was difficult. We revisit previous analyses of nested faunas and introduce a new metric we call “discrepancy” which we recommend as a measure for nestedness. We also recommend that the sample spaces conserve both row sums (number of species per site) and column sums (number of sites per species) derived from the incidence matrix. We compare our results to previous analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 24 March 1998 / Accepted: 17 December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brualdi, R., Sanderson, J. Nested species subsets, gaps, and discrepancy. Oecologia 119, 256–264 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050784

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050784

Navigation