Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sequential modelling of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant using an artificial neural network

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work proposes a sequential modelling approach using an artificial neural network (ANN) to develop four independent multivariate models that are able to predict the dynamics of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended solid (SS), and total nitrogen (TN) removal in a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Suitable structures of ANN models were automatically and conveniently optimized by a genetic algorithm rather than the conventional trial and error method. The sequential modelling approach, which is composed of two parts, a process disturbance estimator and a process behaviour predictor, was also presented to develop multivariate dynamic models. In particular, the process disturbance estimator was first employed to estimate the influent quality. The process behaviour predictor then sequentially predicted the effluent quality based on the estimated influent quality from the process disturbance estimator with other process variables. The efficiencies of the developed ANN models with a sequential modelling approach were demonstrated with a practical application using a data set collected from a full-scale WWTP during 2 years. The results show that the ANN with the sequential modelling approach successfully developed multivariate dynamic models of BOD, COD, SS, and TN removal with satisfactory estimation and prediction capability. Thus, the proposed method could be used as a powerful tool for the prediction of complex and nonlinear WWTP performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamed MM, Khalafallah MG, Hassanien EA (2004) Prediction of wastewater treatment plant performance using artificial neural networks. Environ Modell Softw 19:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guclu D, Dursan S (2010) Artificial neural network modelling of a large-scale wastewater treatment plant operation. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33:1051–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong YS, Bhamidimarri R (2003) Evolutionary self-organising modelling of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Water Res 37:1199–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong YST, Paik BC (2007) Evolutionary multivariate dynamic process model induction for a biological nutrient removal process. J Environ Eng 133:1126–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Henze M, Grady CPL, Gujer W, Marais GvR, Matsuo T (1987) Activated sludge model no 1. International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control. Scientific and Technical Report No 1, London

  6. Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, van Loosdrecht MCM (2007) Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d, and ASM3. IWA. Scientific and Technical Report No 9, London

  7. Suh CW, Lee JW, Hong YST, Shin HS (2009) Sequential modelling of fecal coliform removals in a full-scale activated-sludge wastewater treatment plant using an evolutionary process model induction system. Water Res 43:137–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hong YST, Rosen MR, Bhamidimarri R (2003) Analysis of a municipal wastewater treatment plant using a neural network-based pattern analysis. Water Res 37:1608–1618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao H, Hao OJ, McAvoy TJ (1999) Approaches to modeling nutrient dynamics: ASM2, simplified model and neural networks. Water Sci Technol 39:227–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cinar O (2005) New tool for evaluation of performance of wastewater treatment plant: artificial neural network. Process Biochem 408:2980–2984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai TY, Wang SC, Chiang CF, Su HC, Yu LF, Sung PJ, Lin CY, Hu HC (2009) Improving neural network prediction of effluent from biological wastewater treatment plant of industrial park using fuzzy learning approach. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 32:781–790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moral H, Aksoy A, Gokcay CF (2008) Modeling of the activated sludge process by using artificial neural networks with automated architecture screening. Comput Chem Eng 32:2471–2478

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fang F, Ni BJ, Xie WM, Sheng GP, Liu SG, Tong ZH, Yu HQ (2010) An integrated dynamic model for simulating a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant under fluctuating conditions. Chem Eng J 160:522–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoo CK, Vanrolleghem PA, Lee IB (2003) Nonlinear modeling and adaptive monitoring with fuzzy and multivariate statistical methods in biological wastewater treatment plants. J Biotechnol 105:135–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee DS, Jeon CO, Park JM, Chang KS (2002) Hybrid neural network modeling of a full-scale industrial wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol Bioeng 78:670–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Holubar P, Zani L, Hager M, Froschl W, Radak Z, Braun R (2002) Advanced controlling of anaerobic digestion by means of hierarchical neural networks. Water Res 36:2582–2588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Delnavaz M, Ayati B, Ganjidoust H (2010) Prediction of moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance for the treatment of aniline using artificial neural networks (ANN). J Hazard Mater 179:769–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luccarini L, Porra E, Spagni A, Ratini P, Grilli S, Longhi S, Bortone G (2002) Soft sensors for control of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewaters by neural networks. Water Sci Technol 45:101–107

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M, Eltoukhy MM (2010) The use of artificial neural network (ANN) for modeling of COD removal from antibiotic aqueous solution by the Fenton process. J Hazard Mater 179:127–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinha S, Bose P, Jawed M, John S, Tare V (2002) Application of neural network for simulation of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor performance. Biotechnol Bioeng 77:806–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hong SH, Lee MW, Lee DS, Park JM (2007) Monitoring of sequencing batch reactor for nitrogen and phosphorus removal using neural networks. Biochem Eng J 35:365–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng GM, Qin XS, He L, Huang GH, Liu HL, Lin YP (2003) A neural network predictive control system for paper mill wastewater treatment. Eng Appl Artif Intell 16:121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Machon I, Lopez H, Rodriguez-Iglesias J, Maranon E, Vazquez I (2007) Simulation of a coke wastewater nitrification process using a feed-forward neuronal net. Environ Modell Softw 22:1382–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pai TY, Tsai YP, Lo HM, Tsai CH, Lin CY (2007) Grey and neural network prediction of suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand in hospital wastewater treatment plant effluent. Comput Chem Eng 31:1272–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. May DB, Sivakumar M (2009) Prediction of urban stormwater quality using artificial neural networks. Environ Modell Softw 24:296–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prakash N, Manikandan SA, Govindarajan L, Vijayagopal V (2010) Prediction of biosorption efficiency for the removal of copper (II) using artificial neural networks. J Hazard Mater 152:1268–1275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maier HR, Jain A, Dandy GC, Sudheer KP (2010) Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables in river systems: current status and future directions. Environ Modell Softw 25:891–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elias A, Ibarra-Berastegi G, Arias R, Barona A (2006) Neural networks as a tool for control and management of a biological reactor for treating hydrogen sulphide. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 29:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hollad JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, an introductory analysis with application to biology, control and artificial intelligence. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  32. Link H, Weuster-Botz D (2006) Genetic algorithm for multi-objective experimental optimization. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 29:385–390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang QJ (1997) Using genetic algorithms to optimise model parameters. Environ Modell Softw 12:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gupta I, Gupta A, Khanna P (1999) Genetic algorithm for optimization of water distribution systems. Environ Modell Softw 14:437–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim S, Lee H, Kim J, Kim C, Ko J, Woo H, Kim S (2002) Genetic algorithms for the application of Activated Sludge Model No. 1. Water Sci Technol 45:405–411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hong YS, Bhamidimarri SMR, Charles T (1998) A genetic adapted neural network analysis of performance of the nutrient removal plant at Rotorua. The Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand Annual Conference, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially through Eco-Technopia 21 project (contract number 071-071-118) of the Korea Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea. The authors thank the reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hang-Sik Shin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, JW., Suh, C., Hong, YS.T. et al. Sequential modelling of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant using an artificial neural network. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 34, 963–973 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0547-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-011-0547-6

Keywords

Navigation