Skip to main content
Log in

Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study

Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic resection is a minimally invasive treatment option for rectal cancer but requires highly experienced surgeons. Computer-aided technologies could help to improve safety and efficiency by visualizing risk structures during the procedure. The prerequisite for such an image guidance system is reliable intraoperative information on iatrogenic tissue shift. This could be achieved by intraoperative imaging, which is rarely available. Thus, the aim of the present study was to develop and validate a method for real-time deformation compensation using preoperative imaging and intraoperative electromagnetic tracking (EMT) of the rectum.

Methods

Three models were compared and evaluated for the compensation of tissue deformation. For model A, no compensation was performed. Model B moved the corresponding points rigidly to the motion of the EMT sensor. Model C used five nested linear regressions with increasing level of complexity to compute the deformation (C1–C5). For evaluation, 14 targets and an EMT organ sensor were fit into a silicone-molded rectum of the OpenHELP phantom. Following a computed tomography, the image guidance was initiated and the rectum was deformed in the same way as during surgery in a total of 14 experimental runs. The target registration error (TRE) was measured for all targets in different positions of the rectum.

Results

The mean TRE without correction (model A) was 32.8 ± 20.8 mm, with only 19.6 % of the measurements below 10 mm (80.4 % above 10 mm). With correction, the mean TRE could be reduced using the rigid correction (model B) to 6.8 ± 4.8 mm with 78.7 % of the measurements being <10 mm. Using the most complex linear regression correction (model C5), the error could be reduced to 2.9 ± 1.4 mm with 99.8 % being below 10 mm.

Conclusion

In laparoscopic rectal surgery, the combination of electromagnetic organ tracking and preoperative imaging is a promising approach to compensating for intraoperative tissue shift in real-time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767. doi:10.1001/archsurg.143.8.762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schulz C, Waldeck S, Mauer UM (2012) Intraoperative image guidance in neurosurgery: development, current indications, and future trends. Radiol Res Pract. doi:10.1155/2012/197364

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Justice JM, Orlandi RR (2012) An update on attitudes and use of image-guided surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2:155–159. doi:10.1002/alr.20107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK (2012) Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:1177–1182. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Clifford MA, Banovac F, Levy E, Cleary K (2002) Assessment of hepatic motion secondary to respiration for computer assisted interventions. Comput Aided Surg 7:291–299. doi:10.1002/igs.10049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wysocka B, Kassam Z, Lockwood G, Brierley J, Dawson LA, Buckley CA, Jaffray D, Cummings B, Kim J, Wong R, Ringash J (2010) Interfraction and respiratory organ motion during conformal radiotherapy in gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zijlmans M, Langø T, Hofstad EF, Van Swol CFP, Rethy A (2012) Navigated laparoscopy–liver shift and deformation due to pneumoperitoneum in an animal model. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 21:241–248. doi:10.3109/13645706.2012.665805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kenngott HG, Wagner M, Gondan M, Nickel F, Nolden M, Fetzer A, Weitz J, Fischer L, Speidel S, Meinzer H-P, Böckler D, Büchler MW, Müller-Stich BP (2014) Real-time image guidance in laparoscopic liver surgery: first clinical experience with a guidance system based on intraoperative CT imaging. Surg Endosc 28:933–940. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3249-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenngott HG, Neuhaus J, Müller-Stich BP, Wolf I, Vetter M, Meinzer H-P, Köninger J, Büchler MW, Gutt CN (2008) Development of a navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1858–1865. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9723-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Müller M, Franz AM, Maleike D, Fangerau M, Baumhauer M, Maier-Hein L, Maier-Hein KH, Meinzer H-P, Wolf I (2013) The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 8:607–620. doi:10.1007/s11548-013-0840-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kenngott HG, Wünscher JJ, Wagner M, Preukschas A, Wekerle AL, Neher P, Suwelack S, Speidel S, Nickel F, Oladokun D, Maier-Hein L, Dillmann R, Meinzer HP, Müller-Stich BP (2015) OpenHELP (Heidelberg laparoscopy phantom): development of an open-source surgical evaluation and training tool. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4094-0

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franz AM, Haidegger T, Birkfellner W, Cleary K, Peters TM, Maier-Hein L (2014) Electromagnetic tracking in medicine—a review of technology, validation, and applications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:1702–1725. doi:10.1109/TMI.2014.2321777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenngott HG, Wegner I, Neuhaus J, Nickel F, Fischer L, Gehrig T, Meinzer HP, Müller-Stich BP (2013) Magnetic tracking in the operation room using the da Vinci(®) telemanipulator is feasible. J Robot Surg 7:59–64. doi:10.1007/s11701-012-0347-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horn BKP, Hilden HM, Negahdaripour S (1988) Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using orthonormal matrices. J Opt Soc Am A 5:1127–1135. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.5.001127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R Core Team (2012) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peterhans M, Oliveira T, Banz V, Candinas D, Weber S (2012) Computer-assisted liver surgery: clinical applications and technological trends. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 40:199–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nicolau S, Soler L, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2011) Augmented reality in laparoscopic surgical oncology. Surg Oncol 20:189–201. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2011.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DLG (2004) Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 77(Spec No 2):S140–S153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamoto M, Nakada K, Sato Y, Konishi K, Hashizume M, Tamura S (2008) Intraoperative magnetic tracker calibration using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker for 3-D ultrasound-based navigation in laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:255–270. doi:10.1109/TMI.2007.911003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan MF, Dogan S, Maataoui A, Wesarg S, Gurung J, Ackermann H, Schiemann M, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Vogl TJ (2006) Navigation-based needle puncture of a cadaver using a hybrid tracking navigational system. Invest Radiol 41:713–720. doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000236910.75905.cc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Feuerstein M, Reichl T, Vogel J, Traub J, Navab N (2009) Magneto-optical tracking of flexible laparoscopic ultrasound: model-based online detection and correction of magnetic tracking errors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28:951–967. doi:10.1109/TMI.2008.2008954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Markert M, Koschany A, Lueth T (2010) Tracking of the liver for navigation in open surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5:229–235. doi:10.1007/s11548-009-0395-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Gill IS, Mahadevan A, Miki T, Hashizume M, Sato Y (2008) Realtime organ tracking for endoscopic augmented reality visualization using miniature wireless magnetic tracker. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on medical imaging and augmented reality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 359–366

  24. Maier-Hein L, Tekbas A, Seitel A, Pianka F, Müller SA, Satzl S, Schawo S, Radeleff B, Tetzlaff R, Franz AM, Müller-Stich BP, Wolf I, Kauczor H-U, Schmied BM, Meinzer H-P (2008) In vivo accuracy assessment of a needle-based navigation system for CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the liver. Med Phys 35:5385–5396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beller S, Eulenstein S, Lange T, Hünerbein M, Schlag PM (2009) Upgrade of an optical navigation system with a permanent electromagnetic position control: a first step towards “navigated control” for liver surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:165–170. doi:10.1007/s00534-008-0040-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rassweiler JJ, Müller M, Fangerau M, Klein J, Goezen AS, Pereira P, Meinzer H-P, Teber D (2012) iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol 61:628–631. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heald R, Ryall RD (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The Lancet 327:1479–1482. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91510-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shekhar R, Dandekar O, Bhat V, Philip M, Lei P, Godinez C, Sutton E, George I, Kavic S, Mezrich R, Park A (2010) Live augmented reality: a new visualization method for laparoscopic surgery using continuous volumetric computed tomography. Surg Endosc 24:1976–1985. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0890-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nickel F, Kenngott HG, Neuhaus J, Sommer CM, Gehrig T, Kolb A, Gondan M, Radeleff BA, Schaible A, Meinzer H-P, Gutt CN, Müller-Stich B-P (2013) Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 27:3663–3670. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2941-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Maier-Hein L, Franz AM, Birkfellner W, Hummel J, Gergel I, Wegner I, Meinzer H-P (2012) Standardized assessment of new electromagnetic field generators in an interventional radiology setting. Med Phys 39:3424–3434. doi:10.1118/1.4712222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted within the Research Training Group 1126 Intelligent Surgery and the Transregional Collaborative Research Center 125 Cognition-guided Surgery, both funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG; Projects A01 and A02). The authors thank Ms. Béivin Pyne for careful review of the manuscript as a native speaker.

Disclosures

M. Wagner, M. Gondan, C. Zöllner, J. J. Wünscher, F. Nickel, L. Albala, A. Groch, S. Suwelack, S. Speidel, L. Maier-Hein, B. P. Müller-Stich and H. G. Kenngott have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. G. Kenngott.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 143 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, M., Gondan, M., Zöllner, C. et al. Electromagnetic organ tracking allows for real-time compensation of tissue shift in image-guided laparoscopic rectal surgery: results of a phantom study. Surg Endosc 30, 495–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4231-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4231-9

Keywords

Navigation