Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic instruments incorporate both in-line and pistol-grip handle configurations, yet it is unclear which design is most advantageous for surgeons, particularly when operating at angles perpendicular to the surgeon's position. We present a detailed electromyographic (EMG) comparison of these handle configurations under different force and angle conditions.

Methods: Nine general surgeons used a Microsurge grasper with the handle in an in-line (MS-IL) and pistol (MS-PS) configuration, as well as a standard hemostat (HE), to grasp and close two spring-loaded metal plates. The task was performed randomly by each subject with the three instrument configurations at two forces levels (0.7 N, 4.2 N) and at three angles to the surgeons' body (0, 45, and 90°). Surface EMG was measured from the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), extensor digitorum comunis (EDC), and thenar compartment (TH). The peak root mean squared (RMS) EMG voltage was calculated for each instrument, force, and angle condition. Statistical comparison was carried out by ANOVA.

Results: Both laparoscopic handle configurations required significantly higher contractions of all muscle groups compared to the hemostat at the high force level. TH was not affected by laparoscopic handle configuration. MS-IL required higher FCU, ECU, and EDC contractions at 45° compared to MS-PS. However, MS-IL decreased the flexor compartment muscle contractions (FDP, FDS, FCU) at 90° compared to MS-PS.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic grasping requires higher forearm and thumb muscle contractions compared to the use of a hemostat. The in-line handle configuration is no better than the pistol configuration except when grasping at 90° to the surgeon, where rotation of the handle and wrist back toward the surgeon significantly decreases forearm flexor compartment muscle contractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 3 April 1997/Accepted: 10 August 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berguer, R., Gerber, S., Kilpatrick, G. et al. An ergonomic comparison of in-line vs pistol-grip handle configuration in a laparoscopic grasper. Surg Endosc 12, 805–808 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900717

Navigation