Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Computational Mechanics
Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics 2/2014

01.08.2014 | Review Paper

Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods

verfasst von: Kenji Takizawa

Erschienen in: Computational Mechanics | Ausgabe 2/2014

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This is an overview of the new directions we have taken the space–time (ST) methods in bringing solution and analysis to different classes of computationally challenging engineering problems. The classes of problems we have focused on include bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics, wind-turbine aerodynamics, and cardiovascular fluid mechanics. The new directions for the ST methods include the variational multiscale version of the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized ST method, using NURBS basis functions in temporal representation of the unknown variables and motion of the solid surfaces and fluid meshes, ST techniques with continuous representation in time, and ST interface-tracking with topology change. We describe the new directions and present examples of the challenging problems solved.
Nächster Artikel Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian–Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329–349MathSciNetMATH
2.
Ohayon R (2001) Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural-acoustic and hydroelastic-sloshing systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:3009–3019MATH
3.
van Brummelen EH, de Borst R (2005) On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid-structure interaction problem. SIAM J Sci Comput 27:599–621MathSciNetMATH
4.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR (2006) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Comput Mech 38:310–322MathSciNetMATH
5.
Khurram RA, Masud A (2006) A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 38:403–416MATH
6.
Lohner R, Cebral JR, Yang C, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Soto O (2006) “Extending the range of applicability of the loose coupling approach for FSI simulations”, in H.-J. Bungartz and M. Schafer, editors, Fluid-structure interaction, volume 53 of Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, 82–100, Springer, Dordrecht
7.
Bletzinger K-U, Wuchner R, Kupzok A (2006) “Algorithmic treatment of shells and free form-membranes in FSI”, in H.-J. Bungartz and M. Schafer, editors, Fluid-structure interaction, volume 53 of Lecture notes in computational science and engineering, 336–355, Springer, Dordrecht
8.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3–37MathSciNetMATH
9.
Dettmer WG, Peric D (2008) On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 43:81–90MATH
10.
Bazilevs Y, Gohean JR, Hughes TJR, Moser RD, Zhang Y (2009) Patient-specific isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis of thoracic aortic blood flow due to implantation of the Jarvik (2000) left ventricular assist device. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3534–3550MathSciNetMATH
11.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45:77–89MathSciNetMATH
12.
Calderer R, Masud A (2010) A multiscale stabilized ALE formulation for incompressible flows with moving boundaries. Comput Mech 46:185–197MathSciNetMATH
13.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Liang X, Kvamsdal T, Brekken R, Isaksen J (2010) A fully-coupled fluid-structure interaction simulation of cerebral aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:3–16MathSciNetMATH
14.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Zhang Y, Wang W, Kvamsdal T, Hentschel S, Isaksen J (2010) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and application to cerebral aneurysms. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9:481–498
15.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Wright S, Takizawa K, Henicke B, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part I: geometry modeling and aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:207–235. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2400 MATH
16.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: fluid-structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236–253MATH
17.
Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Kees CE, Farthing MW (2011) Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow. J Comput Phys 230:4137–4152MathSciNetMATH
18.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Blood vessel tissue prestress modeling for vascular fluid-structure interaction simulations. Finite Elem Anal Des 47:593–599MathSciNet
19.
20.
Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) ALE-VMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22:1230002. doi:10.​1142/​S021820251230002​5
21.
Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2012) Free-surface flow and fluid-object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. J Appl Mech 79:010905
22.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: validation and role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech 50:499–511MathSciNetMATH
23.
Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821–833MathSciNetMATH
24.
Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS. Comput Mech 50:719–727MATH
25.
Minami S, Kawai H, Yoshimura S (2012) Parallel BDD-based monolithic approach for acoustic fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 50:707–718MathSciNetMATH
26.
Miras T, Schotte J-S, Ohayon R (2012) Energy approach for static and linearized dynamic studies of elastic structures containing incompressible liquids with capillarity: a theoretical formulation. Comput Mech 50:729–741MathSciNetMATH
27.
van Opstal TM, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R, Lewis MR (2012) A finite-element/boundary-element method for large-displacement fluid-structure interaction. Comput Mech 50:779–788MathSciNetMATH
28.
Yao JY, Liu GR, Narmoneva DA, Hinton RB, Zhang Z-Q (2012) Immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid-structure interaction simulation of aortic valves. Comput Mech 50:789–804
29.
Larese A, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2012) A coupled PFEM–Eulerian approach for the solution of porous FSI problems. Comput Mech 50:805–819
30.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, New York
31.
Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Challenges and directions in computational fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:215–221. doi:10.​1142/​S021820251340001​0
32.
Korobenko A, Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Tippmann J, Bazilevs Y (2013) Structural mechanics modeling and FSI simulation of wind turbines. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23: 249–272
33.
Yao JY, Liu GR, Qian D, Chen CL, Xu GX (2013) A moving-mesh gradient smoothing method for compressible CFD problems. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:273–305
34.
Kamran K, Rossi R, Onate E, Idelsohn SR (2013) A compressible Lagrangian framework for modeling the fluid-structure interaction in the underwater implosion of an aluminum cylinder. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 23:339–367MathSciNetMATH
35.
Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) “Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: Validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment”, Wind Energy, published online, doi:10.​1002/​we.​1599
36.
37.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:339–351. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(92)90059-S MathSciNetMATH
38.
Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94:353–371. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(92)90060-W MathSciNetMATH
39.
40.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods in Fluids 54:855–900. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1430 MathSciNetMATH
41.
42.
43.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluid-structure interaction modeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39–49. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-008-0261-7 MATH
44.
Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26:27–36. doi:10.​1109/​2.​237441
45.
Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73–94. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(94)00077-8 MATH
46.
Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83–130. doi:10.​1007/​BF02897870 MATH
47.
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Benney R (2003) Mesh moving techniques for fluid-structure interactions with large displacements. J Appl Mech 70:58–63. doi:10.​1115/​1.​1530635 MATH
48.
49.
Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Kalro V, Litke M (1996) Flow simulation and high performance computing. Comput Mech 18:397–412. doi:10.​1007/​BF00350249 MATH
50.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Pausewang J, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes. Comput Mech 43:133–142. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-008-0260-8 MATH
51.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space-time finite element computation of complex fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201–1218. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2221 MATH
52.
Takizawa K, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Space-time FSI modeling and dynamical analysis of spacecraft parachutes and parachute clusters. Comput Mech 48:345–364. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-011-0590-9 MATH
53.
54.
Takizawa K, Fritze M, Montes D, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of ringsail parachutes with disreefing and modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 50:835–854. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-012-0761-3 MATH
55.
56.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Boben J, Kostov N, Boswell C, Buscher A (2013) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of clusters of spacecraft parachutes with modified geometric porosity. Comput Mech 52:1351–1364. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-013-0880-5 MATH
57.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Kostov N, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time techniques for computational aerodynamics modeling of flapping wings of an actual locust. Comput Mech 50:743–760. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-012-0759-x MATH
58.
Takizawa K, Kostov N, Puntel A, Henicke B, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time computational analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of a micro aerial vehicle. Comput Mech 50:761–778. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-012-0758-y MATH
59.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, Kostov N (2014) “Sequentially-coupled space-time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV”, Comput Mech, to appear, doi:10.​1007/​s00466-014-0980-x
60.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE, McIntyre S, Kostov N, Kolesar R, Habluetzel C (2014) Space-time VMS computation of wind-turbine rotor and tower aerodynamics. Comput Mech 53:1–15. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-013-0888-x MATH
61.
62.
Cruchaga MA, Celentano DJ, Tezduyar TE (2007) A numerical model based on the Mixed Interface-Tracking/Interface-Capturing Technique (MITICT) for flows with fluid-solid and fluid-fluid interfaces. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:1021–1030. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1498 MATH
63.
Wick T (2013) Coupling of fully Eulerian and arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods for fluid-structure interaction computations. Comput Mech 52:1113–1124MathSciNetMATH
64.
Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) Notes on the stabilized space-time finite element formulation of unsteady incompressible flows. Comput Phys Commun 73:93–112. doi:10.​1016/​0010-4655(92)90031-S
65.
Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S (1994) Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:157–177. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(94)00082-4 MATH
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1992) A finite element study of incompressible flows past oscillating cylinders and aerofoils. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 15:1073–1118. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1650150911
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
Tezduyar T, Osawa Y (2001) The Multi-Domain Method for computation of the aerodynamics of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191:705–716. doi:10.​1016/​S0045-7825(01)00310-3 MATH
77.
78.
Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows—Fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:933–953. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1650211011 MATH
79.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Puntel A, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time computational techniques for the aerodynamics of flapping wings. J Appl Mech 79:010903. doi:10.​1115/​1.​4005073
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
Aliabadi SK, Tezduyar TE (1993) Space-time finite element computation of compressible flows involving moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 107:209–223. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(93)90176-X MATH
85.
Wren GP, Ray SE, Aliabadi SK, Tezduyar TE (1995) Space-time finite element computation of compressible flows between moving components. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:981–991. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1650211015 MATH
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
Stein KR, Benney RJ, Tezduyar TE, Leonard JW, Accorsi ML (2001) Fluid-structure interactions of a round parachute: modeling and simulation techniques. J Aircr 38:800–808. doi:10.​2514/​2.​2864
99.
Stein K, Tezduyar T, Kumar V, Sathe S, Benney R, Thornburg E, Kyle C, Nonoshita T (2003) Aerodynamic interactions between parachute canopies. J Appl Mech 70:50–57. doi:10.​1115/​1.​1530634 MATH
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid-structure interactions with the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized Space-Time formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1885–1895. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cma.​2005.​05.​050 MathSciNetMATH
105.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38:482–490. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-006-0065-6 MATH
106.
107.
108.
109.
Stein K, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Benney R, Charles R (2005) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of parachute soft-landing dynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 47:619–631. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​835 MathSciNetMATH
110.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M (2007) Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: arterial fluid mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:901–922. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1443 MathSciNetMATH
111.
112.
Sathe S, Benney R, Charles R, Doucette E, Miletti J, Senga M, Stein K, Tezduyar TE (2007) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of complex parachute designs with the space-time finite element techniques. Comput & Fluids 36:127–135. doi:10.​1016/​j.​compfluid.​2005.​07.​010 MATH
113.
Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2008) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57:601–629. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1633 MathSciNetMATH
114.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2007) Numerical investigation of the effect of hypertensive blood pressure on cerebral aneurysm—Dependence of the effect on the aneurysm shape. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:995–1009. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​1497 MathSciNetMATH
115.
116.
117.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2008) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Comput Mech 43:151–159. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-008-0325-8 MATH
118.
119.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2009) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of blood flow and cerebral aneurysm: significance of artery and aneurysm shapes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3613–3621. doi:10.​1016/​j.​cma.​2008.​08.​020 MathSciNetMATH
120.
Manguoglu M, Sameh AH, Saied F, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2009) Preconditioning techniques for nonsymmetric linear systems in the computation of incompressible flows. J Appl Mech 76:021204. doi:10.​1115/​1.​3059576
121.
Takizawa K, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2010) Space-time finite element computation of arterial fluid-structure interactions with patient-specific data. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:101–116. doi:10.​1002/​cnm.​1241 MATH
122.
123.
Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE (2010) Wall shear stress calculations in space-time finite element computation of arterial fluid-structure interactions. Comput Mech 46:31–41. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-009-0425-0 MathSciNetMATH
124.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2010) Influence of wall thickness on fluid-structure interaction computations of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:336–347. doi:10.​1002/​cnm.​1289 MathSciNetMATH
125.
Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2010) Solution of linear systems in arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Comput Mech 46:83–89. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-009-0426-z MATH
126.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2010) Role of 0D peripheral vasculature model in fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysms. Comput Mech 46:43–52. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-009-0439-7 MATH
127.
Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Spielman T, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid-structure interaction modeling and performance analysis of the Orion spacecraft parachutes. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:271–285. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2348 MATH
128.
Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Purdue J, McPhail T, Chen PR, Warren J, Tezduyar TE (2011) Patient-specific arterial fluid-structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:308–323. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2360 MATH
129.
Takizawa K, Wright S, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2011) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of parachute clusters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:286–307. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2359 MATH
130.
Manguoglu M, Takizawa K, Sameh AH, Tezduyar TE (2011) Nested and parallel sparse algorithms for arterial fluid mechanics computations with boundary layer mesh refinement. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:135–149. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2415 MathSciNetMATH
131.
Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Influencing factors in image-based fluid-structure interaction computation of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:324–340. doi:10.​1002/​fld.​2448 MATH
132.
Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Brummer T, Chen PR (2011) Space-time fluid-structure interaction modeling of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:1665–1710. doi:10.​1002/​cnm.​1433 MathSciNetMATH
133.
134.
Takizawa K, Spielman T, Moorman C, Tezduyar TE (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of spacecraft parachutes for simulation-based design. J Appl Mech 79:010907. doi:10.​1115/​1.​4005070
135.
Takizawa K, Brummer T, Tezduyar TE, Chen PR (2012) A comparative study based on patient-specific fluid-structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. J Appl Mech 79:010908. doi:10.​1115/​1.​4005071
136.
Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluid-structure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171–225. doi:10.​1007/​s11831-012-9071-3 MathSciNet
137.
Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Bringing them down safely. Mech Eng 134:34–37
138.
139.
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov–Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259MathSciNetMATH
140.
Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221–242. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(92)90141-6 MATH
141.
Hughes TJR (1995) Multiscale phenomena: green’s functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:387–401MATH
142.
Hughes TJR, Oberai AA, Mazzei L (2001) Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows by the variational multiscale method. Phys Fluids 13:1784–1799
143.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173–201MathSciNetMATH
144.
Bazilevs Y, Akkerman I (2010) Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor–Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residual-based variational multiscale method. J Comput Phys 229:3402–3414MathSciNetMATH
145.
Takizawa K, Henicke B, Montes D, Tezduyar TE, Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2011) Numerical-performance studies for the stabilized space-time computation of wind-turbine rotor aerodynamics. Comput Mech 48:647–657. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-011-0614-5
146.
Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194: 4135–4195
147.
Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2008) NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components. Comput Mech 43:143–150MathSciNetMATH
148.
149.
150.
Tezduyar TE, Park YJ (1986) Discontinuity capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:307–325. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(86)90003-4 MATH
151.
Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:85–99MathSciNetMATH
152.
153.
Tezduyar TE, Ganjoo DK (1986) Petrov–Galerkin formulations with weighting functions dependent upon spatial and temporal discretization: applications to transient convection-diffusion problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:49–71. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(86)90023-X MATH
154.
Le Beau GJ, Ray SE, Aliabadi SK, Tezduyar TE (1993) SUPG finite element computation of compressible flows with the entropy and conservation variables formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 104:397–422. doi:10.​1016/​0045-7825(93)90033-T MATH
155.
156.
157.
158.
159.
Tezduyar TE, Senga M, Vicker D (2006) Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the SUPG formulation and YZ\(\beta \) shock-capturing. Comput Mech 38:469–481. doi: 10.​1007/​s00466-005-0025-6 MATH
160.
161.
Catabriga L, Coutinho ALGA, Tezduyar TE (2005) Compressible flow SUPG parameters computed from element matrices. Commun Numer Methods Eng 21:465–476. doi:10.​1002/​cnm.​759
162.
Catabriga L, Coutinho ALGA, Tezduyar TE (2006) Compressible flow SUPG parameters computed from degree-of-freedom submatrices. Comput Mech 38:334–343. doi:10.​1007/​s00466-006-0033-1
163.
Onate E, Valls A, Garcia J (2006) FIC/FEM formulation with matrix stabilizing terms for incompressible flows at low and high Reynolds numbers. Comput Mech 38:440–455MATH
164.
165.
166.
167.
Rispoli F, Saavedra R, Corsini A, Tezduyar TE (2007) Computation of inviscid compressible flows with the V-SGS stabilization and YZ\(\beta \) shock-capturing. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:695–706. doi: 10.​1002/​fld.​1447 MathSciNetMATH
168.
Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Tezduyar TE, Hughes TJR (2007) YZ\(\beta \) discontinuity-capturing for advection-dominated processes with application to arterial drug delivery. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:593–608. doi: 10.​1002/​fld.​1484 MathSciNetMATH
169.
Corsini A, Menichini C, Rispoli F, Santoriello A, Tezduyar TE (2009) A multiscale finite element formulation with discontinuity capturing for turbulence models with dominant reactionlike terms. J Appl Mech 76:021211. doi:10.​1115/​1.​3062967
170.
Rispoli F, Saavedra R, Menichini F, Tezduyar TE (2009) Computation of inviscid supersonic flows around cylinders and spheres with the V-SGS stabilization and YZ\(\beta \) shock-capturing. J Appl Mech 76:021209. doi: 10.​1115/​1.​3057496
171.
172.
173.
174.
175.
Corsini A, Rispoli F, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computer modeling of wave-energy air turbines with the SUPG/PSPG formulation and discontinuity-capturing technique. J Appl Mech 79:010910. doi:10.​1115/​1.​4005060
176.
177.
Metadaten
Titel
Computational engineering analysis with the new-generation space–time methods
verfasst von
Kenji Takizawa
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Computational Mechanics / Ausgabe 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0178-7675
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0924
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-014-0999-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2014

Computational Mechanics 2/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Sequentially-coupled space–time FSI analysis of bio-inspired flapping-wing aerodynamics of an MAV

Original Paper

NURBS- and T-spline-based isogeometric cohesive zone modeling of interface debonding

Original Paper

A finite element model for coupled 3D transient electromagnetic and structural dynamics problems

Original Paper

Efficient numerical approach to unbounded systems subjected to a moving load

Original Paper

Finite subdomain radial basis collocation method

Original Paper

FSI modeling with the DSD/SST method for the fluid and finite difference method for the structure

Neuer Inhalt

    Bildnachweise