Skip to main content
Log in

Copula-based geostatistical modeling of continuous and discrete data including covariates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is common in geostatistics to use the variogram to describe the spatial dependence structure and to use kriging as the spatial prediction methodology. Both methods are sensitive to outlying observations and are strongly influenced by the marginal distribution of the underlying random field. Hence, they lead to unreliable results when applied to extreme value or multimodal data. As an alternative to traditional spatial modeling and interpolation we consider the use of copula functions. This paper extends existing copula-based geostatistical models. We show how location dependent covariates e.g. a spatial trend can be accounted for in spatial copula models. Furthermore, we introduce geostatistical copula-based models that are able to deal with random fields having discrete marginal distributions. We propose three different copula-based spatial interpolation methods. By exploiting the relationship between bivariate copulas and indicator covariances, we present indicator kriging and disjunctive kriging. As a second method we present simple kriging of the rank-transformed data. The third method is a plug-in prediction and generalizes the frequently applied trans-Gaussian kriging. Finally, we report on the results obtained for the so-called Helicopter data set which contains extreme radioactivity measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bárdossy A (2006) Copula-based geostatistical models for groundwater quality parameters. Water Resour Res 42:W11416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bárdossy A, Li J (2008) Geostatistical interpolation using copulas. Water Resour Res 44:W07412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondar I, McLaughlin K, Israelsson H (2005) Improved event location uncertainty estimates. In: Proceedings of 27th seismic research review, pp 299–307

  • De Oliveira V, Kedem B, Short D (1997) Bayesian prediction of transformed Gaussian fields. J Am Stat Assoc 92:1422–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle P, Tawn J, Moyeed R (1998) Model-based geostatistics (with discussion). Appl Stat 47:299–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P, McNeil A, Straumann D (2002), Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls. In: Dempster M (ed) Risk management: value at risk and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 176–223

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fang KT, Zhang YT (1990) Generalized multivariate analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Remillard B (2008) Validity of the parametric bootstrap for goodness-of-fit testing in semiparametric models. Ann Inst Henri Poincare B 44(6):1096–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genest C, Remilliard B, Beaudoin D (2008) Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: a review and a power study. Insur Math Econ 44:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiemstra P, Pebesma E, Twenhöfel C, Heuvelink G (2008) Automatic real-time interpolation of radiation hazards: a prototype and system architecture considerations. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 3:58–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort N, Omre H (1994) Topics in spatial statistics. Scand J Stat 21:289–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram B, Cornford D, Evans D (2008) Fast algorithms for automatic mapping with space-limited covariance functions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:661–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel A, Deutsch C (1996) Rank order geostatistics. In: Baafi E, Schofield N (eds) Geostatistics Wollongong ’96. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 174–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Journel A, Huijbregts C (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazianka H, Pilz J (2009) Spatial interpolation using copula-based geostatistical models. In: Atkinson P, Lloyd C (eds) geoENV VII - Geostatistics for environmental applications. Springer, Berlin (in press)

  • Liebscher E (2008) Construction of asymmetric multivariate copulas. J Multivar Anal 99(10):2234–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelsen R (2006) An Introduction to copulas. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflug G, Römisch W (2008) Modeling, measuring and managing risk. World Scientific, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz J, Spöck G (2008) Why do we need and how should we implement Bayesian kriging methods. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilz J, Kazianka H, Spöck G (2008) Interoperability—spatial interpolation and automated mapping. In: Tsiligiridis T (ed) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on information and communication technologies in bio and earth sciences HAICTA 2008. Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, pp 110–118

  • Porcu E, Mateu J, Zini A (2004) Nonseparable anisotropic classes of spatio-temporal variograms through Archimedean copulas. Technical report, 75-2004, Universitat Jaume I

  • Rade L, Westergren B (2004) Mathematics handbook. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (1994) Introduction to disjunctive kriging and non-linear geostatistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito H, Goovaerts P (2000) Geostatistical interpolation of positively skewed and censored data in a dioxin-contaminated site. Environ Sci Technol 34:4228–4235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de repartition a n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Stat Univ Paris 8:229–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Song P (2007) Correlated data analysis. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Song P, Fan Y, Kalbfleisch J (2005) Maximization by parts in likelihood inference. J Am Stat Assoc 100:1145–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spöck G, Kazianka H, Pilz J (2009) Bayesian trans-Gaussian kriging with log-log transformed skew data. In: Pilz J (ed) Interfacing geostatistics and GIS. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stöhlker U, Dubois G, De Jesus J, Burbeck S, Bleher M, Pebesma E (2009) Real-time mapping for environmental surveillance: a decision-maker’s perspective. In: Hristopoulos D (ed) Proceedings of StatGIS 2009/CD, Technical University of Crete, Chania

  • Varin C (2008) On composite marginal likelihoods. AStA Adv Stat Anal 92:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Copula-based spatial modeling and interpolation for continuous marginals is implemented in the \(\tt{R}\) statistical software as part of the \(\tt{intamap\,R}\)-library which is freely available from https://sourceforge.net/projects/intamap. IDW, Automap, PSGP and TGK are also implemented in this library. This work was partially funded by the European Commission, under the Sixth Framework Programme, by the Contract N. 033811 with DG INFSO, Action Line IST- 2005-2.5.12 ICT for Environmental Risk Management. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannes Kazianka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kazianka, H., Pilz, J. Copula-based geostatistical modeling of continuous and discrete data including covariates. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24, 661–673 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-009-0353-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-009-0353-8

Keywords

Navigation