Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic mechanism of turbulent flow in meandering channels: considerations for deflection angle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To find turbulent flow structure inside meandering channels, three physical models of river meanders representing strongly curved bend, mild bend and elongated symmetrical meander loop were tested in this paper. Instantaneous velocity data in three dimensions were measured using Micro-ADV at different cross sections of these models. Depth averaged velocity vectors, streamwise velocity, secondary currents, turbulent and mean flow kinetic energy were investigated with respect to the sediment deposition pattern. In order to gain more regarding the force acting the sediment particles, three dimensional velocity fluctuations were analyzed in detailed inside the elongated symmetrical meander loop. Occurrence frequency, transition probability and angle of attack for different events were also computed for the points close to the bed. Of the present results, the importance of sweeps and ejections on sediment deposition can be detected. Further, distribution of bursting events is presented through the water column and compared the results with the previous works. Importantly, occurrence of fluctuating velocities in three dimensions at different locations inside the river meanders in addition to the effect of mean flow and turbulent components is responsible for sediment transport. Streamwise velocity distribution through the depth is also compared with some previous mathematical models. Researchers seeking the better control over the river morphology can apply this method without sacrificing much time and cost. This study is also included some insights to be pursued by future works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abad JD, Garcia MH (2009a) Experiments in a high-amplitude Kinoshita meandering channel: 1. Implications of bend orientation on mean and turbulent flow structure. Water Resour Res 45(W02401):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Abad JD, Garcia MH (2009b) Experiments in a high-amplitude Kinoshita meandering channel: 2. Implications of bend orientation on bed morphodynamics. Water Resour Res 45(W02402):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Afzalimehr H, Singh VP (2009) Influence of meandering on the estimation of velocity and shear velocity in cobble-bed channels. J Hydraul Eng (ASCE) 4(10):1126–1135

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmari H, da Silva AMF (2009) Investigation of horizontal coherent structures in shallow open-channel flow using quadrant analysis. In: 33rd IAHR congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment

  • Blanckaert K (2011) Hydrodynamic processes in sharp meander bends and their morphological implications. J Geophys Res 116(3):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, de Vriend HJ (2004) Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends. J Fluid Mech 498:353–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, de Vriend HJ (2005) Turbulence structure in sharp open-channel bends. J Fluid Mech 536:27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanckaert K, Graf WH (2001) Mean flow and turbulence in open-channel bend. J Hydraul Eng (ASCE) 127:835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformation. J R Stat Soc 26(B):211–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Briaud JL, Chen HC, Park S (2001) Predicting meander migration: evaluation of some existing techniques. Report No. FHW AffX-02/2105-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A and M University System, College Station

  • Camporeale C, Perucca E, Ridolfi L (2008) Significance of cutoff in meandering river dynamics. J Geophys Res 113(F01003):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellino M, Lemmin U (2004) Influence of coherent flow structures on the dynamics of suspended sediment transport in open-channel flow. J Hydraul Eng (ASCE) 130(11):1077–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva AMF (1995) Turbulent flow in sine-generated meandering channel. PhD Thesis, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada

  • Dey S (2011) Entrainment threshold of loose boundary streams. In: Rowinski P (ed) Experimental methods in hydraulic research. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duan JG, Wang SSY (2001) The applications of the enhanced CCHE2D model to study the alluvial channel migration processes. J Hydraul Res 39(5):469–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel FL, Rhoads BL (2012) Interaction among mean flow, turbulence, bed morphology, bank failures and channel planform in an evolving compound meander loop. Geomorphology 163–164:70–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Esfahani FS, Keshavarzi A (2011) Effect of different meander curvatures on spatial variation of coherent turbulent flow structure inside ingoing multi-bend river meanders. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25(7):913–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson RI, Parsons DR, Lane SN, Hardy RJ (2003) Flow in meander bends with recirculation at the inner bank. Water Resour Res 39(11):1322–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V (2003) ADV measurements of velocity distributions in a gravel-bed flume. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frothingham KM, Rhoads BL (2003) Three-dimensional flow structure and channel change in an asymmetrical compound meander loop, Embarras River, Illinois. Earth Surf Proc Land 28:625–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathisubramani B, Hutchins N, Hambleton WT, Longmire EK, Marusic I (2005) Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations. J Fluid Mech 524:57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gob F, Houbrechts G, Hiver JM, Petit F (2005) River dredging, channel dynamics and bed load transport in an incised meandering river (The River Semois, Belgium). River Res Appl 21:791–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamidifar H, Keshavarzi A, Saadatnia M, Sistani B (2008) Experimental investigation of the effect of pile installation on change of erosion and sedimentation pattern in channel’s meander. In: 7th Iranian hydraulic conference, Tehran, Iran

  • Harvey MD (1989) Measurement dynamics of the Sacramento River, California. California Riparian Systems Conference, Davis, CA

  • Hooke JM, Harvey AM (1983) Meander changes in relation to bend morphology and secondary flows. In: Collinson JD, Lewin J (eds) Modern and ancient fluvial systems. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 121–132

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hurther D, Lemmin U, Terray EA (2007) Turbulent transport in the outer region of rough wall open-channel flows: the contribution of Large Coherent Shear Stress Structures (LC3S). J Fluid Mech 574:465–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari Mianaei S, Keshavarzi AR (2008) Spatio-temporal variation of transition probability of bursting events over the ripples at the bed of open channel. J Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22(2):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannesson H, Parker G (1989) Velocity redistribution in meandering rivers. J Hydraul Eng 115:1019–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joung Y, Choi SU, Choi J (2007) Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow in a square duct: analysis of secondary flows. J Eng Mech 133(2):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julien P (2002) River mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jung JW, Yoon SE (2000) Flow and bed topography in a 180-degree curved channel. In: 4th international conference on hydro-science and engineering. Korea Water Resources Association

  • Kang S, Sotiropoulos F (2011) Flow phenomena and mechanisms in a field-scale experimental meandering channel with a pool-riffle sequence: insights gained via numerical simulation. J Geophys Res 116:F03011

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarzi A (1997) Entrainment of sediment particles from a flat mobile bed with the influence of near-wall turbulence. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Australia

  • Keshavarzi A, Ball JE (1997) An analysis of the characteristics of rough bed turbulent shear stress in an open channel flow. J Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 11(3):193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keshavarzi A, Gheisi A (2006) Stochastic nature of three dimensional bursting events and sediment entrainment in vortex chamber. J Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21(1):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikkawa H, Kitagawa A, Ikeda S (1976) Flow and bed topography in curved open channels. J Hydraul Div 102:1327–1342

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline SJ, Reynolds WC, Schraub FA, Runstadler PW (1967) The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 30(4):741–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagasse PF, Zevenbergen LW, Spitz WJ, Thorne CR (2004) Methodology for Predicting Channel Migration. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Ayres Associates, Inc. Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Larsen EW, Llano S (2010) Riparian sanctuary channel study: Meander bend migration and cutoff modelling. Landscape Architecture Program, Department of Environmental Design, University of California, Davis

  • Lu WZ, Zhang WS, Cui CZ, Leung AYT (2004) Numerical analysis of free-surface flow in curve-channels with velocity-pressure-free surface correction. Comput Mech 33:215–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Shi Z (2007) Research on the absolute roughness of the typical channel of the south to north water diversion project. J Hydroelectr Eng 26(5):75–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontek ADV Operation Manual (1997) Firmware version 4.0. Sontek, San Diego

  • Nakagawa H, Nezu I (1977) Prediction of the contributions to the Reynolds stress from bursting events in open-channel flows. J Fluid Mech 80(1):99–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nezu I, Nakagawa H (1993) Turbulence in open-channel flows. IAHR Monograph. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Offen GR, Kline SJ (1975) A proposed model of the bursting process in turbulent boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 70:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanicolaou A (1997) The role of turbulence on the initiation of sediment motion. PhD dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

  • Park N (2007) A prediction of meander migration based on large-scale flume tests in clay. PhD thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Texas A and M University

  • Piegay H, Cuaz M, Javelle E, Mandier P (1997) Bank erosion management based on geomorphological, ecological and economic criteria on the Galaure River, France. Regul Rivers 13(5):433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashidi M, Hetsroni G, Banerjee S (1990) Particle–turbulence interaction in a boundary layer. Int J Multiph Flow 16(6):935–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rozovskii IL (1957) Flow of water in bends of open channels (in Russian), Academy of Science of the Ukrainian SSR, Kiev (English translation, Isr. Program for Sci. Transl., Jerusalem 1961)

  • Stoesser T, Fohlich J, Rodi W (2003) Identification of coherent flow structures in open channel flow over rough bed using large eddy simulation. In: Proceedings of 30th IAHR Thessaloniki, Greece

  • Termini D (2009) Experimental observations of flow and bed processes in large-amplitude meandering flume. J Hydraul Eng (ASCE) 135(7):575–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Termini D, Sammartano V (2009) Sediment flow interactions and effects on bed forms mechanism. In: 7th ISE and 8th HIC, Chile

  • Tilston M (2005) Three-dimensional flow structure, turbulence and bank erosion in a 180° meander loop. M.Sc thesis, Université de Montreal, Canada

  • Tilston M, Rennie C, Arnott RWC, Post G (2009) On the nature of coherent turbulent structures in channel bends: burst-sweep orientations in three-dimensional flow fields. In: 33rd IAHR congress: Water Engineering for a Sustainable Environment

  • Van Balen W, Blanckaert K, Uijttewaal WSJ (2010) Analysis of the role of turbulence in curved open-channel flow at different water depths by means of experiments, LES and RANS. J Turbul 11(12):1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang GQ, Huang YF, Wei IH, Wu BS (2006) Identification of roughness-coefficient value for the channel of the south-to-north water transfer (middle line) project. South-to-North Water Transf Water Sci Technol 4(1):8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS (1992) River mechanics. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS, da Silva AMF (2001) Fluvial processes. IAHR Monograph. IAHR, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SQ (2009) Mechanism for initiating secondary currents in channel flows. Can JCivil Eng 36:1506–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang QY, Wang XY, Lu WZ, Wang XK (2009) Experimental study on characteristics of separation zone in confluence zone in rivers. J Hydrol Eng (ASCE) 14(2):166–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Bao W, Liang W, Huang L (2008) Recent studies and progresses of the river roughness. Water Power 34(6):98–100

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Keshavarzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Esfahani, F.S., Keshavarzi, A. Dynamic mechanism of turbulent flow in meandering channels: considerations for deflection angle. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 27, 1093–1114 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0647-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0647-0

Keywords

Navigation