Abstract
The generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) technique is an innovative uncertainty method that is often employed with environmental simulation models. Over the past years, hydrological literature has seen a large increase in the number of papers dealing with uncertainty. There are now a lot of citations to their original paper which illustrates GLUE tremendous impact. GLUE’s popularity can be attributed to its simplicity and its applicability to nonlinear systems, including those for which a unique calibration is not apparent. The GLUE was introduced for use in uncertainty analysis of watershed models has now been extended well beyond rainfall-runoff watershed models. Given the widespread adoption of GLUE analyses for a broad range or problems, it is appropriate that the validity of the approach be examined with care. In this article, we present an overview of the application of GLUE for assessing uncertainty distribution in hydrological models particularly surface and subsurface hydrology and briefly describe algorithms for sampling of the prior parameter in hydrologic simulation models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbaspour KC, Johnson CA, van Genuchten MT (2004) Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure. Vadose Zone J 3(4):1340–1352
Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R (2007) Spatiallydistributed modelling of hydrology and water quality in the pre alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413–430
Adams, B. and Reckhow, K.H.(2001). An examination of the scientific basis for mechanisms and parameters in water quality models. www2.ncsu.edu/ncsu/CIL/WRRI/AdamsReckhow.pdf
Ajami NK, Duan QY, Sorooshian S (2007) An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodal combination framework: confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction. Water Resour Res 43 (1), Art. No. W01403
Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS (2002a) Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE. Hydrol Proc 16:2001–2016
Aronica G, Bates PD, Horrit MS (2002b) Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model prediction using observed binary pattern information with GLUE. Hydrol Process 16:2001–2016
Beck MB (1987) Uncertainty in water quality models. Water Resour Res 23(8):1393
Beven KJ (2006) A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 320(1–2):18–36
Beven KJ, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models, model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298
Beven K, Freer J (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 249(1–4):11–29
Beven KJ, Smith P, Freer J (2008) So just why would a modeler choose to be incoherent? J Hydrol 354(1–4):15–32. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.007
Blasone RS, Vrugt JA, Madsen H et al (2008a) Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Adv Water Resour 2008(31):630–648
Blasone RS, Vrugt JA, Henrik M, Rosbjerg D, Robinson BR, Zyvoloski GA (2008b) Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Adv Water Resour 31:630–648
Blasone R-S, Madsen H, Rosbjerg D (2008c) Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. J Hydrol 353:18–32
Blasone R-S, Vrugt JA, Madsen H, Rosbjerg D, Robinson BA, Zyvoloski GA (2008d) Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Adv Water Resour 31:630–648
Blazkova S, Beven KJ (2002) Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a catchment treated as ungauged (with uncertainty). Water Resour Res 38(8):1139. doi:10.1029/2001WR000500
Brazier RE, Beven KJ, Anthony SG, Rowan JS (2001) Implications of model uncertainty for the mapping of hillslope-scale soil erosion predictions. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:1333–1352
Cameron DS, Beven KJ, Tawn J, Blazkova S, Naden P (1999) Flood frequency estimation by continuous simulation for a gauged upland catchment (with uncertainty). J Hydrol 219:169–187
Carpenter TM, Georgakakos KP (2004) Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrological model. J Hydrol 298:202–221
Chau KW, Wu C, Li Y (2005) Comparison of several flood forecasting models in Yangtze River. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 10(6):485–491
Chen W, Chau KW (2006) Intelligent manipulation and calibration of parameters for hydrological models. Int J Environ Pollut 28(3–4):432–447
Cheng CT, Chau KW, Li X-Y (2007) Hydrologic uncertainty for bayesian probabilistic forecasting model based on BP ANN. Third International Conference on Natural Computation. IEEE Computer Society, Haikou, China, pp. 197–201
Chowdhury S, Sharma A (2007) Mitigating parameter bias in hydrological modelling due to uncertainty in covariates. J Hydrol 340:197–204
Christensen S (2004) A synthetic groundwater modeling study of the accuracy of GLUE uncertainty intervals. Nordic Hydrol 35:45–59
Doherty J (2005) PEST: software for model-independent parameter estimation. Water Mark Numerical Computing, Australia
Engeland K, Xu C-Y, Gottschalk L (2005) Assessing uncertainties in a conceptual water balance model using Bayesian methodology. Hydrol Sci J 50(1):45–63
Feyen L, Beven KJ, De Smedt F, Freer JE (2001) Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: conditioning on head observations. Water Resour Res 37(3):625–638
Franks SW, Beven KJ, Quinn PF, Wright IR (1997) On the sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration. Agric For Met 86:63–75
Freer J, Beven KJ, Ambroise B (1996) Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: an application of the GLUE approach. Water Resour Res 32(7):2161–2173
Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2008a) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Res 42(8–9):2061–2072
Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2008b) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Res 42(8–9):2061–2072
Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2009a) Identifiability analysis for receiving water body quality modeling. Environ Model Softw 24(1):54–62
Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2009b) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology. Sci Total Environ 408(1):138–145
Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2009c) Assessment of data availability influence on integrated urban drainage modelling uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 24(10):1171–1181
Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–472
Georgakakos KP, Seo DJ, Gupta H et al (2004) Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles. J Hydrol 298:222–241
Goodarzi E, Mirzaei M, Ziaei M (2012) Evaluation of dam overtopping risk based on univariate and bivariate flood frequency analyses. Can J Civ Eng 39(4):374–387
Gupta HV, Beven KJ, Wagener T (2005) Model calibration and uncertainty estimation. In: Anderson MG (ed) Encyclopedia of hydrological sciences. John Wiley, New York, pp 2015–2031
Hankin BG, Hardy R, Kettle H, Beven KJ (2001) Using CFD in a GLUE framework to model the flow and dispersion characteristics of a natural fluvial dead zone. Earth Surf Proc Land 26:667–687
Hansson K, Lundin C (2006) Equifinality and sensitivity in freezing and thawing simulations of laboratory and in situ data. Cold Reg Sci Tech 44:20–37
Heidari A, Saghafian B, Maknoon R (2006) Assessment of flood forecasting lead time based on generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation. Stochast Environ Res Risk Assess 20(5):363–380
Hill MC, Tiedeman CR (2007) Effective groundwater model calibration: with analysis of data, sensitivities, predictions, and uncertainty. Wiley and Sons, New York
Hornberger GM, Spear RC (1981) An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems. J Env Manag 12:7–18
Jensen JB (2003) Parameter and uncertainty estimation in groundwater modelling. PhD thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University, Series Paper No. 23
Kavetski D, Franks S, Kuczera G (2002) Confronting input uncertainty in environmental modelling. In: Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Rousseau AN, Turcotte R (eds) Calibration of watershed models. AGU Water Science and Applications Series, Duan, pp 49–68
Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Franks SW (2006a) Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory Water Resour Res 42:W03407
Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Franks SW (2006b) Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 2. Appl Water Resour Res 42(581):W03408
Lamb R, Beven K, Myrabø S (1998) Use of spatially distributed water table observations to constrain uncertainty in a rainfall-runoff model. Adv Water Res 22(4):305–317
Lenhart T, Eckhardt K, Fohrer N, Frede HG (2007) Comparison of two different approaches of sensitivity analysis. Phys Chem Earth 27:645–654
Lindblom EU, Madsen H, Mikkelsen PS (2007) Comparative uncertainty analysis of copper loads in stormwater systems using GLUE and grey-box modelling. Water Sci. Technol Water Supply 56(6):11–18
Mannina G, Viviani G (2009) Parameter uncertainty analysis of water quality model for small river, 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13–17 July 2009
Mantovan P, Todini E (2006) Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 330:368–381. doi:10.1016/j.hydrol.2006.04.046
Marshall L, Nott D, Sharma A (2007) Towards dynamic catchment modelling: a Bayesian hierarchical modelling framework. Hydrol Process 21:847–861
McMichael CE, Hope AS, Loaiciga HA (2006) Distributed hydrological modelling in California semi-arid shrublands: Mike SHE model calibration and uncertainty estimation. J Hydrol 317(3–4):307–324
Mertens J, Madsen H, Feyen L et al (2004a) Including prior information in the estimation of effective soil parameters in unsaturated zone modelling. J Hydrol 294:251–269
Mertens J, Madsen H, Feyen L, Jacques D, Feyen J (2004b) Including prior information in the estimation of effective soil parameters in unsaturated zone modelling. J Hydrol 294(4):251–269
Migliaccio KW, Chaubey I (2008) Spatial distributions and stochastic parameter influences on SWAT flow and sediment predictions. J Hydrol Eng-ASCE 13:258–269
Mirzaei M, Galavi H, Faghih M, Huang YF, Lee TS, El-Shafie A (2013a) Model calibration and uncertainty analysis of runoff in the Zayanderood river basin using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. J Water Supply 62(5):309–320
Mirzaei M, Huang Y, Lee TS, El-Shafie A, Ghazali A (2013b) Quantifying uncertainties associated with depth duration frequency curves. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0819-3
Montanari A (2005) Large sample behaviors of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) in assessing the uncertainty of rainfall–runoff simulations. Water Resour Res 41:W08406. doi:10.1029/2004WR003826
Muleta MK, Nicklow JW (2005) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. J Hydrol 306:127–145
Refsgaard JC, Storm B (1995) MIKE SHE. In: Miller PC (ed) Computer Models of Catchment Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp 809–846
Romanowicz R, Beven KJ, Tawn J (1994) Evaluation of predictive uncertainty in non-linear hydrological models using a Bayesian approach, in statistics for the environment. In: Barnett V, Turkman KF (eds) Water Related Issues, vol 2. John Wiley, Hoboken, pp 297–317
Romanowicz RJ, Beven KJ, Tawn J (1996) Bayesian calibration of flood inundation models. In: Anderson MG, Walling DE (eds) Floodplain processes. Wiley, Chichester, pp 333–360
Schaefli B, Talamba DB, Musy A (2007) Quantifying hydrological modeling errors through a mixture of normal distributions. J Hydrol 332:303–315
Stedinger JR, Vogel RM, Lee SU, Batchelor R (2008) Appraisal of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) method. Water Resour Res 44:W00B06. doi:10.1029/2008WR006822
Tadesse A, Anagnostou EN (2005) A statistical approach to ground radar-rainfall estimation. J Atm Ocean Tech 22(11):1055–1071
Vachaud G, Chen T (2002) Sensitivity of a large-scale hydrologic model to quality of input data obtained at different scales; distributed versus stochastic non-distributed modeling. J Hydrol 264:101–112
Van Straten G (1998) Models for water quality management: the problem of structural change. Water Sci Technol 37(3):103–111
Vezzaro L, Ledin A, Mikkelsen PS (2010).“Integrated modelling of priority pollutants in stormwater systems.” In: Proceeding IDRA Conference, Palermo, Italy
Vogel RM, Stedinger JR, Batchelder R, Lee SU (2008) Appraisal of the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method. Water Resour Res 44(12)
Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bouten W, Sorooshian S (2003) A shuffled complex evolution metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 39(8):1201. doi:10.1029/2002WR001642
Vrugt JA, ter Braak CJF, Gupta HV, Robinson BA (2008) Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling. Stochastic Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y
Wang X, He X, Williams JR, Izaurralde RC, Atwood JD (2005) Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses of crop yields and soil organic carbon simulated with EPIC. Trans Am Soc Agr Eng 48(3):1041–1054
Xiong L, O’Connor KM (2008) An empirical method toimprove the prediction limits of the GLUE methodology in rainfall–runoff modeling. J Hydrol 349(1–2):115–124
Xiong L, Wan M, Wei X, O'Connor KM (2009) Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation. Hydrol Sci J 54(5):852–871. doi:10.1623/hysj.54.5.852
Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Yang H (2007) Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe Basin in China: statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference. J Hydrol 340:167–182
Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Xia J, Yang H (2008) Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. J Hydrol 358:1–23
Acknowledgments
The financial support by the High Impact Research Grant of the University of Malaya and Ministry of Education (UM.C/625/1/HIR/61, account number: H-16001-00-D000061) is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mirzaei, M., Huang, Y.F., El-Shafie, A. et al. Application of the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) approach for assessing uncertainty in hydrological models: a review. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 29, 1265–1273 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-1000-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-014-1000-6