Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The adaptive capabilities of animals and livestock production systems have been emphasized in this report. Biometeorology has a key role in rational management to meet the challenges of thermal environments. While the focus is primarily on cattle in warm or hot climates, the importance of dynamic animal responses to environmental challenges applies to all species and climates. Methods used to mitigate environmental challenges focus on heat loss/heat production balance. Under cold stress, reduction of heat loss is the key. Under heat stress, reduction of heat load or increasing heat loss are the primary management tools, although heat-tolerant animals are also available. In general, livestock with health problems and the most productive animals (e.g., highest growth rate or milk production) are at greatest risk of heat stress, thereby requiring the most attention. Risk management, by considering perceived thermal challenges, then assessing the potential consequences and acting accordingly, will reduce the impact of such challenges. Appropriate actions include: shade, sprinkling, air movement, or active cooling. Summarizing, the most important element of proactive environmental management to reduce risk is preparation: be informed, develop a strategic plan, observe and recognize animals in distress, and take appropriate tactical action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Functional environment is a concept useful for planning and creating animal production systems that altogether comply with the given demands in the best possible way for the benefit of the overall production demands.” (Takai and Ikeguchi 2000).

  2. There is much still to be done to develop biologic response functions needed to transform biological knowledge/data into useful information applicable for rational decision-making.

References

  • ASAE (2003) Design of ventilation systems for poultry and livestock shelters. ASAE Standard EP270.5 FEB03. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • ASHRAE (2005) Fundamentals SI. Environmental control for animals and plants-physiological considerations. ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA

  • Berman A (2005) Estimates of heat stress relief needs for Holstein dairy cows. J Anim Sci 83:1377–1384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackshaw JK, Blackshaw AW (1991) Effects of shade on production and welfare of feedlot beef cattle: roles of animal and environmental factors in heat stress. Report of the Dept. of Farm Animal Medicine and Production, and the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Queensland. St. Lucia, Australia

  • Bond TE, Kelly CF, Garrett WN, Hahn GL (1961) Evaluation of materials for livestock shades. California Agric 15:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond TE, Kelly CF, Morrison SR, Pereira N (1967) Solar, atmospheric, and terrestrial radiation received by shaded and unshaded animals. Trans ASAE 10:622–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray DR, Bucklin RA, Carlos L, Cavalho V (2003) Environmental temperatures in a tunnel ventilated barn and in an air conditioned barn in Florida. In: Proceedings, Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference, 29–31 January 2003, Fort Worth, Texas. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Brouk MJ, Smith JF, Harner JP III (2003) Effect of sprinkling frequency and airflow on respiration rate, body surface temperature and body temperature of heat stressed dairy cattle. In: Proceedings, Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference, 29–31 January 2003, Fort Worth, Texas. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Brown-Brandl T, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA (2005) Heat stress risk factors for feedlot heifers. In: Proceedings, Seventh International Livestock Environment Symposium, 18–20 May 2005, Beijing, China. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Eigenberg RA, Mader TL, Morrow JL, Dailey JW (2006) Comparison of heat tolerance of feedlot heifers of different breeds. Livestock Sci 105:19–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Calegari F, Calamari L, Frazzi E (2003) Effects of ventilation and misting on behaviour of dairy cattle in the hot season in south Italy. In: Proceedings, Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference, 29–31 January 2003, Fort Worth, Texas.ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Collier RJ, Dahl GE, VanBaale MJ (2006) Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 89:1244–1253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MS, Mader TL (2001) Effects of water application to feedlot surface during the summer. In: Proceedings, Sixth International Livestock Environment Symposium, 21–23 May 2001. Louisville, Kentucky. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Eigenberg RA, Hahn GL, Nienaber JA, Brown-Brandl T, Spiers D (2000) Development of a new RR monitor for cattle. Trans ASAE 43:723–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Eigenberg RA, Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA, Hahn GL (2005) Dynamic response indicators of heat stress in shaded and non-shaded feedlot cattle. Part 2: Predictive relationships. Biosystems Eng 9:111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenberg RA, Brown-Brandl TM, Nienaber JA (2006) Development of a livestock weather safety monitor for feedlot cattle. Appl Eng Agric (in press)

  • Flaba J, Bickert W, Capdeville J, Georg H, Kaufmann R, Len JJ, Loynes J, Poellinger A, Tillie M, Ventorp M, Zappavigna P (2002) The design of beef cattle housing, report of the CIGR section II working group n° 14 cattle housing. Paper No. 024026. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Frank KL, Mader TL, Harrington JA Jr., Hahn GL, Davis MS (2001) Climate change effects on livestock production in the Great Plains. In: Proceedings, Sixth International Livestock Environment Symposium, 21–23 May 2001, Louisville, Kentucky. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Garrett WN (1963) Importance of environment and facilities in beef production. Unpublished manuscript prepared for Symposium presentation at American Society Animal Science Meeting, Corvallis, Oregon

  • Gaughan JB, Holt SM, Hahn GL, Mader TL, Eigenberg R (2000) Respiration rate—is it a good measure of heat stress in cattle? Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 77 [Suppl C]:329–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaughan JB, Byrne T, Lott S, Binns P, Killip C (2005) Reducing the risk of heat load for the Australian feedlot industry. Final Report Project Number FLOT.327. Meat & Livestock Australia, Sydney NSW

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooch CA, Stowell RR (2003) Tunnel ventilation for freestall facilities - design, environmental conditions, cow behavior, and economics. In: Proceedings, Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference, 29–31 January 2003, Fort Worth, Texas. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Hahn GL (1981) Housing and management to reduce climatic impacts on livestock. J Anim Sci 52:175–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL (1982) Compensatory performances in livestock: influences on environmental criteria. In: Proceedings, Second International Livestock Environment Symposium, 20–23 April 1982, Ames, Iowa. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Hahn GL (1985) Management and housing of farm animals in hot environments. In: Yousef M (ed) Stress physiology in livestock. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 151–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL (1995a) Global warming and potential impacts on cattle and swine in tropical and temperate areas. In: Proceedings, First Brazilian Congress on Biometeorology, 4–6 September 1995 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil

  • Hahn GL (1995b) Environmental management for improved livestock performance, health and well-being. Jpn J Livestock Manage 30:113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL (1999) Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. J Anim Sci 77[Suppl 2]:10–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL, Mader TL (1997) Heat waves in relation to thermoregulation, feeding behavior and mortality of feedlot cattle. In: Proceedings, Fifth International Livestock Environment Symposium, May 1997. Bloomington, Minnesota. ASAE, St Joseph, MI

  • Hahn GL, Morrow-Tesch JL (1993) Improving livestock care and well-being. Agric Eng 74:14–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL, Osburn DD (1969) Feasibility of summer environmental control for dairy cattle based on expected production losses. Trans ASAE 12:448–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL, Kelly CF, McKillop AA, Bond TE (1962) The relation of roof size to temperatures of irradiated metal roof sections exposed to forced convection. Ag Research Service Bulletin Series ARS 42–58

  • Hahn GL, Eigenberg RA, Nienaber JA, Littledike ET (1990) Measuring physiological responses of animals to stressors using a microcomputer-based portable datalogger. J Anim Sci 68:2658–2665

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn GL, Mader TL, Gaughan JB, Hu Q, Nienaber JA (1999) Heat waves and their impacts on feedlot cattle. In: Proceedings, 15th International Society Biometeorology Congress, 353–357 (ICB Paper No. 11.1), September 1999. Sydney, Australia

  • Hahn GL, Mader TL, Eigenberg RA (2003) Perspective on development of thermal indices for animal studies and management. In: Lacetera N, Bernabucci U, Khalifa H, Ronchi B, Nardone A (eds) Interactions Between Climate and Animal Production EAAP Tech Series No. 7, Wageningen, The Netherlands (ISBN 9076998264)

  • Hungerford LL, Buhman MJ, Dewell RD, Mader TL, Griffin D, Smith DR, Nienaber JA (2000) Investigation of heat stress mortality in four midwest feedlots. In: Proceedings, International Symposium on Vet Epid and Econ, August 2000. Breckenridge, CO, #616

  • Hyde GM, Puckett HB, Olver EF, Harshbarger KE (1981) A step toward dairy heard management by exception. Trans ASAE 24:202–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CF, Bond TE (1958) Effectiveness of artificial shade material. Agric Engn 39:758

    Google Scholar 

  • Khongdee S, Chaiyabutr N, Hinch G, Markvichitr K, Vajrakubkka C (2006) Effects of evaporative cooling on reproduction performance and milk production of dairy cows in hot wet conditions. Int J Biometeorol 50:253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • LCI (1970) Patterns of transit losses. Livestock Conservation, Omaha, NE

    Google Scholar 

  • Mader TL, Dahlquist JM, Hahn GL, Gaughan JB (1999) Shade and wind barrier effects on summer-time feedlot cattle performance. J Anim Sci 77:2065–2072

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mader TL, Holt SM, Gaughan JB, Hahn GL, Davis MS, Parkhurst AM, Spiers DE (2001) Heat load management for feedlot cattle. In: Proceedings, Sixth International Livestock Environment Symposium. Louisville, Kentucky 2001. ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 147–153

  • Mader TL, Holt SM, Hahn GL, Davis MS, Spiers DE (2002) Feeding strategies for managing heat load in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 80:2373–2382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meat & Livestock Australia (2002) Heat load in feedlot cattle 2002. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited, Feedlot: FL08–FL13

  • Mitlöhner FM (2000) Behavioral and environmental management of feedlot cattle (Dissertation). Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas

  • Morrison SR, Given RC, Lofgreen GP (1972) Sprinkling cattle for relief from heat stress. J Anim Sci 36:428–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison SR, Prokap M, Lofgreen GP (1981) Sprinkling cattle for heat stress relief: activation temperature, duration of sprinkling and pen area sprinkled. Trans ASAE 24:1299–1305

    Google Scholar 

  • MWPS (1987) Beef Housing and Equipment Handbook. Publication MWPS-6, 4th edn, Midwest Plan Service, Ames, Iowa

  • Nienaber JA, Hahn GL, Eigenberg RA, Brown-Brandl TM, Gaughan JB (2001) Feed intake response of heat-challenged cattle. In: Proceedings, Sixth International Livestock Environment Symposium. Louisville, Kentucky 2001.ASAE, St Joseph, MI, 154–164

  • Oliver JC, Hellman MH, Bishop SE, Pelissier CL, Bennett LF (1979) Heat stress survey. Calif Agric 33:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott IM, Johnson HD, Hahn GL (1983) Effect of programmed diurnal temperature cycles on plasma thyroxine level, body temperature, and feed intake of Holstein dairy cows. Int J Biometeorol 27:47–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simensen E (1984) Livestock environment and health-general concepts and research strategies. Report 7, Dept Animal Husbandry and Genetics. Norwegian College of Veterinary Medicine, Oslo

  • Takai H, Ikeguchi A (2000) Summary of Japan-Denmark Workshop on IT Utilization of Improved Functional Environment in Animal Industry. Tsukuba, Japan (ISBN 4-921201-45-5)

  • Thom EC (1959) The discomfort index. Weatherwise 12:57–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner LW, Chastain JP, Hemken RW, Gates RS, Crist WL (1992) Reducing heat stress in dairy cows through sprinkler and fan cooling. Appl Eng Agric 8:251–256

    Google Scholar 

  • USAgNet.com (2006) California’s Cattle Death Toll Surpasses 25,000 [Online] Available URL: http://www.wisconsinagconnection.com/story-national.cfm?ID=1479&yr=2006

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.A. Nienaber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nienaber, J., Hahn, G. Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. Int J Biometeorol 52, 149–157 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0103-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-007-0103-x

Keywords

Navigation