Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Groundwater Composition on Arsenic Detection by Bacterial Biosensors

  • Published:
Microchimica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

A luminescent bacterial biosensor was used to quantify bioavailable arsenic in artificial groundwater. Its light production above the background emission was proportional to the arsenite concentration in the toxicologically relevant range of 0 to 0.5 µM. Effects of the inorganic solutes phosphate, Fe(II) and silicate on the biosensor signal were studied. Phosphate at a concentration of 0.25 g L−1 phosphate slightly stimulated the light emission, but much less than toxicologically relevant concentrations of the much stronger inducer arsenite. No effect of phosphate was oberved in the presence of arsenite. Freshly prepared sodium silicate solution at a concentration of 10 mg L−1 Si reduced the arsenite-induced light production by roughly 37%, which can be explained by transient polymerization leading to sequestration of some arsenic. After three days of incubation, silicate did not have this effect anymore, probably because depolymerization occurred. In the presence of 0.4 mg L−1 Fe(II), the arsenite-induced light emission was reduced by up to 90%, probably due to iron oxidation followed by arsenite adsorption on the less soluble Fe(III) possibly along with some oxidation to the stronger adsorbing As(V). Addition of 100 µM EDTA was capable of releasing all arsenic from the precipitate and to transform it into the biologically measurable, dissolved state. The biosensor also proved valuable for monitoring the effectiveness of an arsenic removal procedure based on water filtration through a mixture of sand and iron granules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • M Berg H C Tran T C Nguyen H V Pham R Schertenleib W Giger (2001) Environ Sci Technol 35 25

    Google Scholar 

  • W H Yu C M Harvey C F Harvey (2003) Wat Resour Res 39 1146 Occurrence Handle10.1029/2002WR001327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M M Rahman D Mukherjee M K Sengupta U K Chowhudry D Lodh C R Chanda S Roy M Selim Q Quamrussaman A H Milton S H Shahidullah M T Rahman D Chakraborti (2002) Environ Sci Technol 36 5385 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XotlSmtbc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1021/es020591o

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • British Geological Survey, Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bangladesh. BGS Technical Report WC/00/19; London, 2001

  • J Cai M S DuBow (1997) Biodegradation 8 105 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXntlKqsbw%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008281028594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S Tauriainen M Virta W Chang M Karp (1999) Anal Biochem 272 191 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXksFantLs%3D Occurrence Handle10.1006/abio.1999.4193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • F F Roberto J M Barnes D F Bruhn (2002) Talanta 58 181 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XlvVGns7c%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00266-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • J Stocker D Balluch M Gsell H Harms J Feliciano S Daunert K A Malik J R van der Meer (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37 4743 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXnt1Orsbc%3D Occurrence Handle10.1021/es034258b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Turpeinen M Virta M M Haggblom (2003) Environ Toxicol Chem 22 1 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XpslCmsLo%3D Occurrence Handle10.1897/1551-5028(2003)022<0001:AOABIC>2.0.CO;2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • C Djerassi (2004) Angew Chem Int Ed 43 2330 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXktFShtLs%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/anie.200330079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L C Roberts S J Hug T Ruettimann M Billah A W Khan M T Rahman (2004) Environ Sci Technol 38 307 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXovFOgs7c%3D Occurrence Handle10.1021/es0343205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S J Hug L Canonica M Wegelin D Gechter U von Gunten (2001) Environ Sci Technol 35 2114 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXitlyrs78%3D Occurrence Handle10.1021/es001551s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S J Hug O Leupin (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37 2742 Occurrence Handle10.1021/es026208x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D K Nordstrom (2002) Science 296 2143 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XkvFGhs7o%3D Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.1072375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • G R Willsky M H Malamy (1980) J Bacteriol 144 366 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaL3cXmtlWlsLY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan J J (1996) Aquatic chemistry, chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York

  • J Nriagu M J Kim (2000) Sci Total Environ 247 71 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00470-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B Nowack L Sigg (1997) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61 951 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXhvVGksLo%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0016-7037(96)00391-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • S Ramanathan W P Shi B P Rosen S Daunert (1997) Anal Chem 69 3380 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXkslKhs7o%3D Occurrence Handle10.1021/ac970111p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hauke Harms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harms, H., Rime, J., Leupin, O. et al. Effect of Groundwater Composition on Arsenic Detection by Bacterial Biosensors. Microchim Acta 151, 217–222 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-005-0402-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-005-0402-z

Navigation