Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of cumulative surgical experience on the outcome of poor-grade patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm

  • Clinical Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The expansion of endovascular techniques for intracranial aneurysms has led to a global decrease in vascular neurosurgery activity. This situation might impact neurosurgeons’ level of expertise, even though they all might have to deal with this surgically challenging pathology. In that context, we wanted to assess the impact of cumulative surgical experience on the outcome of patients with poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) treated by microsurgery.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients who underwent surgery for a ruptured aneurysm with SAH and ICH, and a WFNS scale of IV/V, were included. Surgeries were performed by five surgeons, whose experience was judged by the total number of aneurysm surgeries performed. The outcome was assessed by three indicators: intraoperative rupture (IOR), early mortality, and the modified Rankin Scale at last follow-up. The time of IOR was reported on an IOR score. The correlation between surgical experience and outcome was assessed by linear regression. Nonlinear regression was used to assess the correlation of the data with a learning curve model.

Results

The analysis showed an influence of surgical experience on intraoperative rupture, with no effect on long-term outcome. No influence was found on early mortality. Increased surgical experience seems to reduce IOR during aneurysm dissection and clip repositioning. Intraoperative rupture data fit Wright’s learning curve model.

Conclusion

This study suggests a direct impact of cumulative experience on the course of ruptured aneurysm surgery and pleads for the use of training and simulation programmes dedicated to neurovascular surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Guru KA, Froghi S, de Win G, Van Poppel H, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2013) Learning curves for urological procedures: a systematic review. BJU Int doi:10.1111/bju.12315, PMID:24053179

  2. Andaluz N, Zuccarello M (2008) Recent trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: analysis of a nationwide inpatient database. J Neurosurg 108:1163–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajter HH, Samson D (1986) Intraoperative aneurysmal rupture: incidence, outcome, and suggestions for surgical management. Neurosurgery 18:701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beier F, Sismanidis E, Stadie A, Schmieder K, Männer R (2012) An aneurysm clipping training module for the neurosurgical training simulator NeuroSim. Stud Health Technol Inform 173:42–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berman MF, Solomon RA, Mayer SA, Johnston SC, Yung PP (2003) Impact of hospital-related factors on outcome after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 34:2200–2207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bokhari AR, Davies MA, Diamond T (2013) Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: a single surgeon experience and the learning curve. Br J Neurosurg 27:44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bourne SK, Walcott BP, Sheth SA, Coumans JV (2013) Neurological surgery: the influence of physical and mental demand on humans performing complex operations. J Clin Neurosci 20:342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bradac O, Hide S, Mendelow DA, Benes V (2012) Aneurysm treatment in Europe 2010: an internet survey. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154:971–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brisman JL, Niimi Y, Song JK, Berenstein A (2005) Aneurysmal rupture during coiling: low incidence and good outcomes at a single large volume center. Neurosurgery 57:1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan S, Conti F, Salisbury K, Blevins NH (2013) Virtual reality simulation in neurosurgery: thecnhologies and evolution. Neurosurgery 72:154–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dedy NJ, Bonrath EM, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP (2013) Teaching nontechnical skills in surgical residency: a systematic review of current approaches and outcomes. Surgery 154:1000–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Elijovich L, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler G, Giannotta S, Johnston SC (2008) Predictors and outcome of intraprocedural rupture in patients treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the CARAT study. Stroke 39:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elsmore AJ, Mendoza ND (2002) The operative learning curve for vestibular schwannoma excision via the retrosigmoid approach. Br J Neurosurg 16:448–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Faurie C, Khadra M (2012) Technical competences in surgeons. ANZ J Surg 82:682–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Foroughi M, Pitkaniemi J, Nannapaneni R, Nath F (2010) Excision of vestibular schwannomas—is there a learning curve and how best to demonstrate it? Br J Neurosurg 24:547–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gasco J, Holbrook TJ, Patel A, Smith A, Paulson D, Muns A, Desai S, Moisi M, Kuo YF, Macdonald B, Ortega-Barnett J, Patterson JT (2013) Neurosurgery simulation in residency training: feasibility, cost, and educational benefit. Neurosurgery 73:39–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giannotta SL, Oppenheimer JH, Levy ML, Zelman V (1991) Management of intraoperative rupture of aneurysm without hypotension. Neurosurgery 28:531–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Granger A, Laherty R (2013) Epidemiology and treatment of cerebral aneurysms at an australian tertiary level hospital. Internet J Neurosurg 9

  19. Hattori N, Katayama Y, Abe T, Japan Neurosurgical Society (2007) Case volume does not correlate with outcome after cerebral aneurysm clipping: a nationwide study in Japan. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 47:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heller AC, Padilla RV, Mamelak AN (2009) Complications of epilepsy surgery in the first 8 years after neurosurgical training. Surg Neurol 71:631–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoh BL, Rabinov JD, Pryor JC, Carter BS, Barker FG (2003) In-hospital morbidity and mortality after endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996–2000: effect of hospital and physician volume. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1409–1420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Houkin K, Kuroda S, Takahashi A, Takikawa S, Ishikawa T, Yoshimoto T, Itamato K (1999) Intra-operative premature rupture of the cerebral aneurysms. Analysis of the causes and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141:1255–1263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hsu HT, Chang SJ, Yang SS, Chai CL (2013) Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy. Eur Spine J 22:727–733

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Chergui D (2013) The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH (2012) Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery 71:614–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lawton MT, Du R (2005) Effect of the neurosurgeon’s surgical experience on outcomes from intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Neurosurgery 57:9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Leach P, Abou-Zeid AH, Kearney T, Davis J, Traner OJ, Gnanalingham KK (2010) Endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: evidence of an operative learning curve. Neurosurgery 67:1205–1212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leake CB, Brinjikji W, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ (2011) Increasing treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms at high-volume centers in the United States. J Neurosurg 115:1179–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee JC, Jang HD, Shin BJ (2012) Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases. Spine 35:1548–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leipzig TJ, Morgan J, Horner TG, Payner T, Redelman K, Johnson CS (2005) Analysis of intraoperative rupture in the surgical treatment of 1964 saccular aneurysms. Neurosurgery 56:455–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lemole M, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Charbel F, Oh M (2009) Virtual ventriculostomy with ‘shifted ventricle’: neurosurgery resident surgical skill assessment using a high-fidelity haptic/graphic virtual reality simulator. Neurol Res 31:430–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin N, Cahill KS, Frerichs KU, Friedlander RM, Claus EB (2012) Treatment of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms in the USA: a paradigm shift. J Neurointer Surg 4:182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Marinho P, Thines L, Verscheure L, Mordon S, Lejeune JP, Vermandel M (2012) Recent advances in cerebrovascular simulation and neuronavigation for the optimization of intracranial aneurysm clipping. Comput Aided Surg 17:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mashiko T, Otani K, Kawano R, Konno T, Kaneko N, Ito Y, Watanabe E (2013) Development of 3-dimensional hollow elastic-model for cerebral aneurysm clipping simulation enabling rapid and low-cost prototyping. World Neurosurgery. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.10.032, PMID:24141000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM, Tekkis P, Hanna GB (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nakabayashi H, Shimizu K (2012) Stereoscopic virtual realistic surgical simulation in intracranial aneurysms. Neurol India 60:191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pierot L, Pelle L, Vitry F, Investigators ATENA (2010) Similar safety in centers with low and high volumes of endovascular treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of the analysis of treatment by endovascular approach of nonruptured aneurysms study. ANJR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Riffaud L, Neumuth T, Morandi X, Trantakis C, Meixensberger J, Burgert O, Trelhu B, Jannin P (2010) Recording of surgical processes: a study comparing senior and junior neurosurgeons during lumbar disc herniation surgery. Neurosurgery 67:325–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Samson D, Bajter HH, Bowman G, Mootz L, Krippner WJ, Meyer YJ, Allen BC (1994) A clinical study of the parameters and effects of temporary arterial occlusions in the management of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 34:22–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schramm J, Cedzich C (1993) Outcome and management of intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Surg Neurol 40:26–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Smith SJ, Eralil G, Woon K, Sama A, Dow G, Robertson I (2010) Light at the tunnel: the learning curve associated with endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery. Skull base 20:69–74

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sundt TM, Kobayashi S, Fode NC, Whisnant JP (1982) Results and complications of surgical managment of 809 intracranial aneurysms in 722 cases. Realted and unrelated to grade of patient, type of aneurysms, and timing of surgery. J Neurosurg 56:753–765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Lindert EJ, Böcher-Schwarz HG, Perneczky A (2001) The influence of surgical experience on the rate of intraoperative aneurysm rupture and its impact on aneurysm treatment outcome. Surg Neurol 56:151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang B, Lü G, Patel AA, Ren P, Chang I (2011) An evaluation of the learning curve for a complex surgical technique: the full endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar disc herniations. Spine J 11:122–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang H, Huang B, Li C, Zhang Z, Wang J, Zheng W, Zhou Y (2013) Learning curve for the percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy depending on the surgeon’s training level of minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115:1987–1991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wright TP (1936) Factors influencing the costs of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 3:122–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mrs. Cecile-Marie Le Reste for helping them revise the language

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre-Jean Le Reste.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le Reste, PJ., Henaux, PL., Riffaud, L. et al. Influence of cumulative surgical experience on the outcome of poor-grade patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Acta Neurochir 157, 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2241-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2241-3

Keywords

Navigation