Abstract
The effect of possessive pronouns on the encoding of pronoun-noun associations (e.g., my garden) was investigated using the electroencephalography (EEG). Following an alphabetical, semantic and a contextual encoding instruction depth of noun processing was varied within three separate experiments in order to manipulate the grade of awareness related to verbal information processing. Only for the semantic encoding task (lexical decision) response time was significantly longer for nouns associated with the pronoun “mein” (German for “my”) than for nouns associated with the pronoun “ein” (German for “a”) although pronouns were not to be consciously processed at all. Following recognition tests related to nouns (without their previously associated pronouns) revealed no significant differences related to the number of correctly identified repeated nouns (hits) depending on the kind of previously associated pronoun. The analysis of neurophysiological data revealed a time range between about 250 ms and 400 ms after stimulus onset within which significant pronoun × electrode interactions occurred. No interaction with depth of word processing was found. Overlaid EEG curves, t maps and low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) demonstrate that in this time range “mein” and “sein” associated conditions elicit similar brain activity, both more negative, compared to the “ein” associated condition over occipital electrodes. On the other hand, at left temporal sites the “mein” condition elicited more negative potentials than both other conditions. It is interpreted that EEG recordings reveal two relevant areas, which are sensitive to the concept of a person (as represented by a personal pronoun) between about 250 ms and 400 ms after stimulus onset. One area is located in the occipital region and can distinguish between personal engagement and a neutral condition and the other area is located in the temporal region and is able to distinguish between oneself and somebody else. Together with our previous MEG results (Walla et al. in Neuropsychologia 45:796–809, 2007) we want to combine the inferences in the frame of the “multiple aspects” hypothesis related to research on self-awareness and the awareness of others.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan K, Rugg MD (1997) An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition. Neuropsychologia 35(4):387–397
Baron-Cohen S, Ring H, Moriarty J, Schmitz B, Costa D, Ell P (1994) The brain basis of theory of mind: the role of the orbitofrontal region. Br J Psychiatry 165:640–649
Craik FIM, Lockhart RS (1972) Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 11:671–684
Craik FIM, Moroz TM, Moscovitch M, Stuss DT, Winocur G, Tulving E, Kapur S (1999) In search of the self: a positron emission tomography study. Psychol Sci 10:26–34
D’Argembeau A, Ruby P, Colette F, Degueldre C, Balteau E, Luxen A, Maquet P, Salmon E (2007) Distinct regions of the medial prefrontal cortex are associated with self-referential processing and perspective taking. J Cogn Neurosci 19(6):935–944
Farrer C, Frith CD (2002) Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage 15:596–603
Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18(2):324–333
Fletcher PC, Happe F, Frith U, Baker SC, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Frith CD (1995) Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of ‘theory of mind’ in story comprehension. Cognition 57:109–128
Frith CD, Frith U (1999) Interacting minds, a biological basis. Science 286:1692–1695
Gallagher HL, Happe F, Brunswick N, Fletcher PC, Frith U, Frith CD (2000) Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia 38:11–21
Kircher TTJ, Brammer M, Bullmore E, Simmons A, Bartels M, David AS (2002) The neural correlates of intentional and incidental self processing. Neuropsychologia 40:683–692
Lu LH, Crosson B, Nadeau SE, Heilman KM, Gonzalez-Rothi LJ, Raymer A, Gilmore RL, Bauer RM, Roper SN (2002) Category-specific naming deficits for objects and actions: semantic attribute and grammatical role hypotheses. Neuropsychologia 40(9):1608–1621
McCarthy G, Wood CC (1985) Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 62:203–208
Mitchell JP (2007) Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for Theory-Of-Mind. Cerebral Cortex. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm051 (ahead of print)
Paller KA, Kutas M (1992) Brain potentials during retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. J Cogn Neurosci 4:375–391
Pascual-Marqui RD, Michel CM, Lehmann D (1994) Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. Int J Psychophysiol 18:49–65
Pizzagalli DA, Lehmann D, Hendrick AM, Regard M, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ (2002) Affective judgements of faces modulate early activity (∼160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. Neuroimage 16:663–677
Pfeifer JH, Lieberman MD, Dapretto M (2007) “I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self- and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults. J Cogn Neurosci 19(8):1323–1337
Premack D, Woodruff G (1978a) Chimpanzee problem-solving: a test for comprehension. Science 202(4367):532–535
Premack D, Woodruff G (1978b) Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind?”. Behav Brain Sci 4:515–526
Rugg MD, Mark RE, Walla P, Schloerscheidt AM, Birch CS, Allan K (1998) Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature 392:595–598
Saxe R, Kanwisher N (2003) People thinking about thinking people. The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. Neuroimage 19:1835–1842
Saxe R, Wexler A (2005) Making sense of another mind: the role of the right temporo-parietal junction. Neuropsychologia 43:1391–1399
Ventura P, Morais J, Brito-Mendes C, Kolinsky R (2005) The mental representation of living and nonliving things: differential weighting and interactivity of sensorial and non sensorial features. Memory 13(2):124–147
Vogeley K, Bussfeld P, Newen A, Herrmann S, Happe F, Falkai P, Maier W, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Zilles K (2001) Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage 14(1):170–181
Vogeley K, May M, Ritzl A, Falkai P, Zilles K, Fink GR (2004) Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. J Cogn Neurosci 16(5):817–827
Völlm BA, Taylor ANW, Richardson P, Corcoran R, Stirling J, McKie S, Deakin JFW, Elliott R (2006) Neuronal correlates of theory of mind and empathy: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study in a nonverbal task. Neuroimage 29:90–98
Walla P (1998) Neurologische Grundlagen von Gedächtnisfunktionen beim Menschen, dissertation. University of Vienna, Austria
Walla P, Hufnagl B, Lindinger G, Imhof H, Deecke L, Lang W (2001) Left temporal and temporo-parietal brain activity depends on depth of word encoding: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study in healthy young subjects. Neuroimage 13:402–409
Walla P, Deecke L, Lang W (2005) How chemical information processing interferes with face processing: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuroimage 24(1):111–117
Walla P, Greiner K, Duregger C, Deecke L, Thurner S (2007) Self awareness and the subconscious effect of personal pronouns on word encoding: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Neuropsychologia 45:796–809
Warrington EK, McCarthy R (1983) Category specific access dysphasia. Brain 106:859–878
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF project P16022-B02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walla, P., Duregger, C., Greiner, K. et al. Multiple aspects related to self-awareness and the awareness of others: an electroencephalography study. J Neural Transm 115, 983–992 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-008-0035-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-008-0035-6