Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating business-IT alignment through multi-disciplinary goal concepts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Requirements Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The alignment of information technology (IT) with business strategies is optimal when harmony exists between organizational and system goals. Empirical evidence reveals that effective strategic alignment leads to superior financial performance for organizations. This observation has spurred extensive research into business-IT alignment. Yet, the issue of alignment remains a top concern for CIOs. We argue that the parochial view undertaken by past research into business-IT alignment is a probable cause for continuing system failures. Furthermore, strategic alignment research is limited and devoid within the requirements engineering discipline. In this paper, we highlight existing shortfalls of research in business-IT alignment, and bring to light insights that may be offered by other disciplines to augment this field. Subscribing to a multi-disciplinary perspective, we develop a goal-based framework that incorporates goals from various literatures in investigating business-IT alignment. One of the novelties of our proposed framework lies in its delineation between goals that have been originally assigned to stakeholders versus those interpreted by stakeholders. Additionally, the framework includes constructs at the strategic level for supporting the rationale of strategic level goals. We tested the usefulness and usability of this methodology in an organization with a newly developed information system founded on strategic business goals and reported lessons learnt from both researchers’ and practitioners’ perspectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan Y, Huff S, Barclay D, Copeland D (1997) Business strategic orientation, information systems orientation and strategic alignment. Inf Syst Res 8:125–150. doi:10.1287/isre.8.2.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kearns G, Lederer A (2000) The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. J Strateg Inf Syst 9:265–293. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00049-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leede J, Looise J, Alders B (2002) Innovation, improvement and operations: an exploration of the management of alignment. Int J Technol Manag 23:353–368. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2002.003015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan Y, Reich B (2007) IT alignment: what have we learned? J Inf Technol 22:295–315

    Google Scholar 

  5. Luftman J, Kempaiah R, Nash R (2006) Key issues for IT executives 2005. MIS Q Exec 5:81–101

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cragg P, King M, Hussin H (2002) IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms. Strateg Inf Syst 11:109–132. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00007-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sabherwal R, Chan Y (2001) Alignment between business and IS strategies: a study of prospectors, analyzers and defenders. Inf Syst Res 12:11–33. doi:10.1287/isre.12.1.11.9714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan Y, Sabherwal R, Thatcher J (2006) Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 51:27–47. doi:10.1109/TEM.2005.861804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yetton P (1994) False prophecies, successful practice and future directions in IT management. In: Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 open conference: business process re-engineering: information systems opportunities and challenges. Queensland, Australia

  10. Sauer C, Burn J (1997) The pathology of strategic management: steps of the future. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luftman J, Brier T (1999) Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. Calif Manag Rev 42:14

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salinesi C, Thevenet L (2007) Aligning IS to organization’s strategy: the INSTAL method. In: The 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’07), Norway

  13. Luftman J (2000) Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 4, Article 14

  14. Thevenet L-H, Salinesi C (2007) Aligning IS to organization’s strategy: the INSTAL method. In: CAISE 2007, Norway

  15. Boswell W, Boudreau JW (2001) How leading companies create, measure and achieve strategic results through “line of sight”. Manag Decis 39:851–859. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006525

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDonald RA, Myklebust RP (1997) Fundamental change and the bottom line. Best’s Rev 98:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  17. Boswell W, Bingham J, Colvin A (2006) Aligning employees through “line of sight”. Bus Horiz 49:499–509. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2006.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald R, Myklebust R (1997) Fundamental change and the bottom line. Best’s Rev 98:80–83

    Google Scholar 

  19. Witt LA (1998) Enhancing organizational goal congruence: a solution to organizational politics. J Appl Psychol 83:666–674

    Google Scholar 

  20. DeLisi P (2005) IT alignment revisited: why we’re no closer to IT alignment today than we were 20 years ago. In: CIO magazine

  21. Reich B, Benbasat I (1996) Measuring linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Q 20:55–81. doi:10.2307/249542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Henderson J, Venkatraman N (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst J 32:4–16

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mckeen J, Smith H (2003) Making IT happen: critical issues in it management. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kefi H, Kalika M (2005) Survey of strategic alignment impacts on organizational performance in international European companies. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

  25. Kangas K (2003) Business strategies for information technology management. IRM Press, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  26. Reich B, Benbasat I (2000) Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Q 24:81–113. doi:10.2307/3250980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chan Y (2002) Why haven’t we mastered alignment?: The importance of the informal organization structure. MIS Q Exec 1:97–112

    Google Scholar 

  28. Brown CV, Magill SL (1994) Alignment of the IS function with the enterprise: toward a model of antecedents. MIS Q 18:371–403. doi:10.2307/249521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tavakolian H (1989) Linking the information technology structure with organizational competitive strategy: a survey. MIS Q 13:309–317. doi:10.2307/249006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pyburn P (1983) Linking the MIS plan with corporate strategy: an exploratory study. MIS Q 7:1–14. doi:10.2307/248909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tallon P (2003) The alignment paradox. In: CIO insight, vol 1

  32. Insight Staff CIO (2004) Is your culture hindering alignment? In: CIO insight, vol 45, pp 65–75

  33. Van Der Zee JM, De Jong B (1999) Alignment is not enough: integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business ScoreCard. J Manag Inf Syst 16:137–156

    Google Scholar 

  34. Burn J (1993) Information systems strategies and the management of organizational change—a strategic alignment model. J Inf Technol 8:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lederer AL, Mendelow AL (1989) Coordination of information systems plans with business plans. J Manag Inf Syst 8:27–45

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vitale MR, Ives B, Beath CM (1986) Linking information technology and corporate strategy: an organizational view. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on information systems, San Diego

  37. Wang R, Strong D (1996) Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers. J Manag Inf Syst 12:5–34

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Feeny DF, Edwards B, Simpson KM (1992) Understanding the CEO/CIO relationship. MIS Q 16:435–448. doi:10.2307/249730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Earl MJ (1989) Management strategies for information technology. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. Orton D, Weick K (1990) Loosely coupled systems: a reconceptualization. Acad Manage Rev 12:203–223. doi:10.2307/258154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pfeffer J (1978) “The micropolitics of organizations” in environments and organizations. Joset-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  42. Standish-Group (1994) The Chaos report. In: The Standish Group

  43. Kotonya G, Sommerville I (1996) Requirements engineering with viewpoints. Softw Eng J 11:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kristof AL (1996) Person-organization fit: an integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement and implications. Person Psychol 49:1–49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Guzzo RA, Shea GP (1991) Group performance and intergroup relations and organizations. Consulting Psychologists Press Inc., Palo

    Google Scholar 

  46. Boswell W, Boudreau J (2001) How leading companies create, measure and achieve strategic results through “line of sight”. Manage Decis 39:851–859. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hatch NW, Dyer JH (2004) Human capital and learning as a single source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strateg Manage J 25:1155–1178. doi:10.1002/smj.421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. George J (1992) The role of personality in organizational life: issues and evidence. J Manage 18:185–213. doi:10.1177/014920639201800201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Campion M, Lord R (1982) A control systems conceptualization of the goal-setting and change process. Organ Behav Hum Perform 30:265–287. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(82)90221-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Elliott P, Dweck C (1988) Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:5–12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vancouver JB, Austin JT (1996) Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process and content. Psychol Bull 120:338–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Strahle WM, Spiro RL, Acito F (1996) Marketing and sales: strategic alignment and functional implementation. J Pers Sell Sales Manage 16:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hollenbeck J, Howard K (1987) Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: problems, prospects and proposals for future research. J Appl Psychol 72:212–220. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jackson SE, Schuler RS (1995) Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annu Rev Psychol 46:237–264. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ulrich D (1998) Intellectual capital competence × competence × commitment. Sloan Manage Rev 39:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yu E (1995) Modeling strategic relationships for process reengineering. Department of Computer Science, University of Toronto

  57. Rolland C, Souveyet C, Ben-Achour C (1998) Guiding goal modeling using scenarios. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24:1055–1071. doi:10.1109/32.738339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bleistein S (2006) B-SCP: an integrated approach for validating of organizational it requirements with competitive business strategy. In: School of Computer Science and Engineering, vol Doctor of Philosophy. The University of New South Wales, Sydney

  59. Penker M, Han-Erik E (2000) Business modeling with UML: business patterns at work. Wiley, New York

  60. Gordign J, Akkermans J, v. V. J (2003) Value-based requirements engineering: exploring innovative ecommerce ideas. Requir Eng 8:114–135. doi:10.1007/s00766-003-0169-x

  61. Pigneur Y, Osterwalder A, Lagha S (2001) Modeling e-Business with eBML. In: 5th international workshop on the management of firms. Mahdia, Tunisia

  62. Bleistein A, Cox K, Verner J (2005) Strategic alignment in requirements analysis of organization IT: an integrated approach. In: ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC 05). Santa Fe, USA

  63. Bubenko J (1994) Enterprise modelling. Netw Inf Syst 2:657–677

    Google Scholar 

  64. Loucopoulos P (2001) The S3 (strategic-service-support) framework for business process modeling. In: 3rd international conference on enterprise information systems. Setubal, Portugal

  65. Champion R, Moores T (1996) Exploiting an enterprise model during requirements capture and analysis. In: International conference on requirements engineering. Colorado, Springs

  66. Bleistein A, Cox K, Verner J (2006) Validating strategic alignment of organizational IT requirements using goal modeling and problem diagrams. J Syst Softw 79:362–378

    Google Scholar 

  67. Barney J, Griffin R (1992) The management of organizations: strategy, structure, behavior. Houghton Miffline Co., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  68. Boardman AE, Shapiro DM, Vining AR (2004) A framework for comprehensive strategic analysis. J Strateg Manag Educ 1(2):307–342

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kassarjian H (1977) Content analysis in consumer research. J Consum Res 4:8–18. doi:10.1086/208674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Kolber AB, Estep C, Hay D, Struck G, Lam G, Zachman J, Hall J, Fishman N (2000) Organizing business plan: the standard model for business rule motivation. In: Business Rule Group

  71. Mintzberg H, Ahlstrand B, Lampel J (1998) Strategy safari: a guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  72. Charles H, Jones Gareth R (1998) Strategic management theory: an integrated approach. Houghton Mifflin College Div, 4th edn (July 1997)

  73. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1999) Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv Bus Rev January–February:75–85

  74. Nuseibeh B, Easterbrook S (2000) Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: Conference on the future of software engineering, Ireland

  75. Ellis CA, Wainer J (1994) Goal based models on collaboration. Collab Comput 1:61–86

    Google Scholar 

  76. van Lamsweerde A, Letier E (2000) Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 26(10):978–1005

    Google Scholar 

  77. Singh S (2007) The 3g framework. In: Proceedings of the 19th Doctoral Consortium on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CaiSE), Norway

  78. Boswell W (2006) Aligning employees with the organization’s strategic objectives: out of line of sight, out of mind. Int J Hum Resour Manag 17:1489–1511. doi:10.1080/09585190600878071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wand Y, Weber R (1995) On the deep structure of information systems. Inf Syst J 5:203–223

    Google Scholar 

  80. Wand Y, Woo C, Jung D (2000) Object-oriented modeling: from enterprise model to logical design. In: Proceedings to the 10th workshop in information technologies and systems. Brisbane, Australia

  81. Anton A (1997) Goal identification and refinement in the specification of software-based information systems. In: Department of Computer Science. Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia

  82. Hong J (2001) Goal recognition through goal graph analysis. J Artif Intell Res 15:1–30

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lesh N, Etzioni O (1995) A sound and fast goal recognizer. In: Proceedings of international joint conference on artificial intelligence. Montreal, pp 1704–1710

  84. Alter S (2006) The work system method: connecting people, processes and IT for business results. Work System Press, Larkspur

    Google Scholar 

  85. Baltzan A, Phillips A (2008) Business driven information systems. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, 2053 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T1Z2, Canada

    Sase Narine Singh & Carson Woo

Authors
  1. Sase Narine Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carson Woo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sase Narine Singh.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Constructs and relationships definition in the 3g model

See Table 6.

Table 6 Definitions of the constructs and relationships in the 3g framework 
Full size table

Appendix 2: Strategic form for eliciting strategy constructs

figure a

Appendix 3: Agent form for eliciting their reinterpretation of the firm’s ‘assigned goal’

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, S.N., Woo, C. Investigating business-IT alignment through multi-disciplinary goal concepts. Requirements Eng 14, 177–207 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-009-0081-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-009-0081-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation