Skip to main content
Log in

MoteTrack: a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. Our system, called MoteTrack, is based on low-power radio transceivers coupled with a modest amount of computation and storage capabilities. MoteTrack does not rely upon any back-end server or network infrastructure: the location of each mobile node is computed using a received radio signal strength signature from numerous beacon nodes to a database of signatures that is replicated across the beacon nodes themselves. This design allows the system to function despite significant failures of the radio beacon infrastructure. In our deployment of MoteTrack, consisting of 23 beacon nodes distributed across our Computer Science building, we achieve a 50th percentile and 80th percentile location-tracking accuracy of 0.9 and 1.6 m respectively. In addition, MoteTrack can tolerate the failure of up to 60% of the beacon nodes without severely degrading accuracy, making the system suitable for deployment in highly volatile conditions. We present a detailed analysis of MoteTrack’s performance under a wide range of conditions, including variance in the number of obstructions, beacon node failure, radio signature perturbations, receiver sensitivity, and beacon node density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN (2000) RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In: INFOCOM, pp 775–784

  2. Youssef M, Agrawala A, Shankar AU (2003) WLAN location determination via clustering and probability distributions. In: IEEE PerCom 2003

  3. Slack G (2003) Smart helmets could bring firefighters back alive. FOREFRONT (2003) Engineering Public Affairs Office, Berkeley

  4. McKinsey & Company: Increasing fdny’s preparedness. http://www.nyc.gov/html/fdny/html/mck_report/index.shtml (2002)

  5. Myllymaki P, Roos T, Tirri H, Misikangas P, Sievanen J (2001) A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on Wireless LANs

  6. Smailagic A, Small J, Siewiorek DP (2000) Determining user location for context aware computing through the use of a wireless LAN infrastructure

  7. Ray S, Starobinski D, Trachtenberg A, Ungrangsi R (2004) Robust location detection with sensor networks. IEEE JSAC 22

  8. Krumm J, Williams L, Smith G (2002) SmartMoveX on a graph—an inexpensive Active Badge Tracker. In: UbiComp 2002

  9. Bahl P, Balachandran A, Padmanabhan V (2000) Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Technical Report 2000-12, MSR

  10. Castro P, Chiu P, Kremenek T, Muntz RR (2001) A probabilistic room location service for wireless networked environments. In: UbiComp

  11. Pandya D, Jain R, Lupu E (2003) Indoor location estimation using multiple wireless technologies. In: IEEE PIMRC

  12. Christ T, Godwin P (1993) A prison guard duress alarm location system. In: IEEE ICCST

  13. Hightower J, Want R, Borriello G (2000) SpotON: an indoor 3D location sensing technology based on RF signal strength. Technical Report UW CSE 00-02-02, University of Washington

  14. Priyantha NB, Chakraborty A, Balakrishnan H (2000) The cricket location-support system. In: MobiCom

  15. Priyantha NB, Miu A, Balakrishnan H, Teller S (2001) The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM MobiCom

  16. Ward A, Jones A, Hopper A (1997) A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Commun 4

  17. Want R, Hopper A, Falcao V, Gibbons J (1992) The Active Badge location system. Technical Report 92.1, Olivetti Research Ltd. (ORL)

  18. Lorincz K, Welsh M (2004) A robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. Technical Report TR-19-04, Harvard University

  19. Hill J, Szewczyk R, Woo A, Hollar S, Culler DE, Pister KSJ (2000) System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: ASPLOS 2000, pp 93–104

  20. Lorincz K, Welsh M (2005) MoteTrack: a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Location- and Context-Awareness (LoCA 2005) at Pervasive 2005, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

  21. Krumm J, Platt J (2003) Minimizing calibration effort for an indoor 802.11 device location measurement system. Technical Report MSR-TR-2003-82, Microsoft Research

  22. WAAS: what is WAAS? (2005) http://www.garmin.com/aboutGPS/waas.html

  23. Lorincz K, Malan DJ, Fulford-Jones TRF, Nawoj A, Clavel A, Shnayder V, Mainland G, Moulton S, Welsh M (2004) Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities. IEEE Pervasive Comput

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konrad Lorincz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorincz, K., Welsh, M. MoteTrack: a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11, 489–503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0095-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-006-0095-2

Keywords

Navigation