Abstract
This article presents a conceptualisation of technologies as simple, ambient forms. By avoiding the tendency to solve problems and by being open to interaction that emerges through repetition and flow, we argue that technology can offer more for people than functionality. When the user is given freedom to discover control without burdensome cognitive demands and the fear of failure, even everyday technologies can arouse curiosity and thus reveal untapped ability. What is unique about our work is its therapeutic application as a medium for engaging the most hard to reach children on the autism spectrum. Our theoretical foundations are drawn from the human–computer interaction paradigm of tangible interaction. This is of interest to us as a framework for the study of the physical and sensory manipulation of information. For children with cognitive and developmental delays, discovering a close match between physical control and digital response has proved both rewarding and motivating. The significance of this is illustrated through a range of studies undertaken with children with autism spectrum disorders. These include a mixed group attending a holiday club, a study that introduced keyboard activities to children with poor receptive communication and a case study using an ordinary microphone. The research captures emergent, exploratory interaction with a software application called ReacTickles. The case study uses a specifically customised video coding technique to analyse idiosyncratic interactions that demonstrate the impact of simple, playful interaction on self-esteem and creativity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ASD:
-
Autism spectrum disorders
- ICT:
-
Information communication technologies
- SLD:
-
Severe learning disability
- PLP:
-
Personalised Learning Plan
- FAO:
-
Functional Assessment Observation Form
References
Aldred C, Green J, Adams C (2004) A new social communication intervention for children with autism: pilot randomized controlled treatment study suggesting effectiveness. J Child Psychol Psych 45:1420–1430
Antle N (2007) Tangibles: five properties to consider for children. CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. San Jose, CA, pp 2243–2248
Bailey CA (1996) A guide to field research. Pine Forge, Thousand Oaks
Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U (2004) Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 1985(21):37–46
Bogdashina O (2003) Sensory perceptual issues in autism and Asperger syndrome. Jessica Kingsley, London
Bogdashina O (2004) Communication issues in autism and Asperger syndrome: do we speak the same language? Jessica Kingsley, London
Buchenau M, Fulton Suri J (2000) Experience prototyping, DIS '00: proceedings of the conference on designing interactive systems. ACM, New York, pp 424–433
Burkhart L (2005) Glossary of behaviour and social terms: the Burkhart Center for Autism Education & Research. Accessed December 2009 http://www.educ.ttu.edu
Chalfant AM, Rapee R, Carroll L (2006) Treating anxiety disorders in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders: a controlled trial. J Autism Dev Disabil 15:138–145
Cumine V, Leach J, Stevenson G (2000) Autism in the early years: a practical guide. David Fulton, London
Dawe M (2006) Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technology. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006
Denscombe M (1998) The good research guide. Open University Press, Buckingham
Dourish P (2001) Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT, Cambridge
Edwards A, Talbot R (1999) The hard pressed researcher. Pearson, Harlow
Ehn P (2008) Participation in design things. PDC 2008, Bloomington, USA, ACM
Ely M (1991) Doing qualitative research: circles within circles. Routledge Falmer, London
Fishkin K (2004) A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Pers Ubiq Comput 8:347–358
Frye V, Walker K (1998) Review of ASIEP. J Psychoeduc Assess 16:280–285
Graham J (2004) Communicating with the uncommunicative: music therapy with preverbal adults. B J Learn Disabil 32:24–29
Hagen P, Robertson T (2010) Social technologies: challenges and opportunities for participation. In: Proceedings of PDC 2010
Hardy C, Ogden J, Newman J, Cooper S (2002) Autism and ICT: a guide for teachers and parents. David Fulton, London
Healy J (1998) Failure to connect: how computers affect our children’s minds. Simon & Shuster, New York
Heidegger M (1996) Being and time. State University of New York Press, Albany
Hill J, Furniss F (2006) Patterns of emotional and behavioural disturbance associated with autistic traits in young people with severe intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours. Res Dev Disabil 27(5):517–528
Hornecker E, Buur J (2006a) Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of CHI 2006, ACM Press, pp 437–446
Hornecker E (2006b) Physicality in tangible interaction: bodies and the world. Position paper for the first international workshop on physicality, Lancaster University, UK
Howarth IC (2011) Can using microphone-operated, interactive software in a playful context encourage creativity? A case study of a child with severe learning disabilities and an autism spectrum condition. Good Autism Pract (in press)
Hoyles C, Noss R (1999) Playing with (and without) words. In: Proceedings of the seventh European logo conference Eurologo '99 Sofia, Bulgaria, pp 18–29
Jackson J (2008) Nurturing the engagement of children with an autism spectrum disorder through digital poly- sensory experiences. PhD thesis
Keay-Bright W (2006) Reactivities: autism and play. Digit Creat 17(3):149–156
Keay-Bright W (2007) Can computers create relaxation? Designing Reactickles software with children on the autistic spectrum. CoDesign 3(2):97–110
Keay-Bright W (2007) The Reactive Colours project: demonstrating participatory and collaborative design methods for the creation of software for autistic children. Des Princ Pract Int J 1(2):7–16
Keay-Bright W (2008) Tangible technologies as interactive play spaces for children with learning difficulties: the Reactive Colours project. Int J Technol Knowl Soc 4(1):111–120
Keay-Bright W (2009) ReacTickles: playful interaction with information communication technologies. Int J Arts Technol 2(1–2):133–151
Kelly-Vance L, Oliver Ryalls B (2005) A systematic, reliable approach to play assessment in preschoolers. School Psychol Int 26:398–412
Merleau-Ponty M (1962) Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge, London
Murray D (1997) Autism and information technology: therapy with computers. In: Powell S, Jordan R (eds) Autism and learning: a guide to good practice. David Fulton, London
Murray D, Aspinall A (2006) Getting IT. Jessica Kingsley, London
Murray D, Lesser M (1997). Autism and computing. Available http://www.autismandcomputing.org.uk/ (accessed December, 2010)
Norman DA (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic Books, New York
Norman D (2005) Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York
O’Neill R, Horner R (1997) Functional assessment and program development for problem behaviour. Wadsworth, California
Ozonoff S, Pennington BF, Rogers SJ (1991) Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: relationship to theory of mind. J Child Psychol Psych 32:1081–1105
Price S, Rogers Y, Scaife M, Stanton D, Neale H (2003) Using ‘tangibles’ to promote novel forms of playful learning. Interact Comput 15(2):169–185
Receveur C, Lenoir P, Desombre H, Roux S, Barthelemy C, Malvy J (2005) Interaction and imitation deficits from infancy to 4 years of age in children with autism: a pilot study based on videotape. Autism 9(1):69–82
Robins B, Dautenhahn K, te-Boekhorst R, Billard A (2005) Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society, vol 4:2
Rojahn J (2000) The stereotyped behaviour scale. Res Dev Disabil 21:437–454
Rubin K (1983) Play. In: Hetherington E (ed) Handbook of child psychology, vol 4. Wiley, New York, pp 693–774
Shahar E (2009) Pah! Retrieved May 12, 2009, from Eyals: http://www.designer.co.il/pah/
Sherratt D, Peter M (2002) Developing play and drama in children with autistic spectrum disorders. David Fulton, London
Sherston America http://www.sherstonamerica.com/node/52
Shneiderman B (1987) Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Addison, Wesley
Singer J (2006) Learning to play and learning through play. In: Singer D, Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K (eds) Play = learning. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Spectronics http://www.spectronicsinoz.com/product/reactickles
Tag Learning http://www.taglearning.com/taglearning/by-category/personalised-learning/reactickles-2.html
Thackara J (2005) In the bubble: designing in a complex world. MIT, Cambridge
Taylor-Bruckner C, Yoder P (2007) Restricted object use in young children with autism. Autism 11:161–171
Ullmer B, Ishii H (2000) Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems 39:3–4
Wing L (1996) The Autistic spectrum. Constable, London
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Autism Cymru and The Dyscovery Centre for enthusiastically taking part in the studies described in the paper. Furthermore, we would like to acknowledge the tremendous support of Mary Letheren-Jones and Glenys Jones without whom these studies would not have been possible. We are grateful to the National Film Board of Canada for funding the Dyscovery Centre workshop.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keay-Bright, W., Howarth, I. Is simplicity the key to engagement for children on the autism spectrum?. Pers Ubiquit Comput 16, 129–141 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0381-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0381-5