Abstract
In many cities in developing countries, clusters of small and medium-sized enterprises create severe pollution problems. Because conventional regulatory approaches are typically ineffective in such situations, policy responses have increasingly focused on promoting voluntary clean technological change. Yet the data and analysis needed to guide such efforts are scarce. This article uses original firm-level survey data on a cluster of small and medium-scale leather tanneries in León, Guanajuato—Mexico’s leather goods capital—to identify the factors that drive the adoption of two clean tanning technologies. Using a multivariate probit model to estimate a system of seemingly unrelated regressions, we find—in contrast to conventional wisdom—that neither firm size nor regulatory pressure is positively correlated with adoption. Rather, the key driver of adoption is the firm’s human capital, the same factor that often explains conventional productivity-enhancing technological change. We also find that a private-sector trade association is an important source of technical information about clean technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adeoti J (2002) Technology and the environment in sub-Saharan Africa; emerging trends in the Nigerian manufacturing industry. Ashgate, Burlington, VT
Antle J (1987) Econometric estimation of producers’ risk attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:509–522
Bárcenas G (2008) No han estudiado efectos de químicos de curtidoras (Studies of the effects of tanning chemicals do not exist). Correo de Hoy. http://www.correo-gto.com.mx/notas.asp?id=78012. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Bárcenas G (2009a) Reprueban protección al ambiente (Violating environmental protection). Correo de Hoy. http://www.correo-gto.com.mx/notas.asp?id=126094. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Bárcenas G (2009b) Incumplen curtidores acuerdos ambientales (Tanneries fail to fulfill environmental agreements). Correo de Hoy. http://www.correo-gto.com.mx/notas.asp?id=142665. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Bárcenas G (2010) Se deslinda cicur de muertes de aves (CICUR defended in bird deaths). Correo de Hoy. http://www.correo-gto.com.mx/notas.asp?id=144717. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Blackman A (2002) The economics of technology diffusion: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation in developing countries. In: Nagel S (ed) Environmental policy and developing nations. McFarland, Jefferson, NC, pp 288–307
Blackman A (ed) (2006) Small firms and the environment in developing countries: collective impacts, collective action. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
Blackman A (In Press) Alternative pollution control policies in developing countries. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Blackman A, Bannister GJ (1998) Community pressure and clean technology in the informal sector: an econometric analysis of the adoption of propane by traditional Mexican brickmakers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35:1–21
Blackman A, Sisto N (2006) Voluntary environmental regulation in developing countries: a Mexican case study. Natural Resources Journal 46:1005–1042
Blackman A, Newbold S, Shih J-S, Evans D, Cook J, Batz M (2006) The benefits and costs of informal sector pollution control: traditional Mexican brick kilns. Environment and Development Economics 11:603–627
Commission for Environmental Cooperation (1995) The death of migratory birds at the Silva reservoir (1994–95). CEC Secretariat, Montreal, Quebec. http://www.cec.org/Page.asp?PageID=1226&SiteNodeID=346. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Feder G, Lau L, Lin J, Luo X (1990) The relationship between credit and productivity in Chinese agriculture: a microeconomic model of disequilibrium. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:1151–1157
Fletcher SM, Terza JV (1986) Analyzing farmers’ selection of available marketing alternatives using the multivariate probit model. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 34:243–251
Greene WH (2008) Econometric analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 614, 826–831
Hernández J (1987) Situacion actual del problema de contaminación en la región Calzatecnia 9. Center of Applied Innovation in Competitive Technologies, León, Guanajuato
Jaffe A, Newell R, Stavins R (2003) Technological change and the environment. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent J (eds) Handbook of environmental economics, vol 1. North-Holland/Elsevier, Amsterdam, 461–516
Kerr S, Newell R (2003) Policy-induced technology adoption: evidence from the US lead phasedown. Journal of Industrial Economics 51:317–343
Khanna M (2001) Sequential adoption of site-specific technologies and its implications for nitrogen productivity: a double selectivity model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:35–51
Lanjouw P (2006) Small-scale industry, poverty and the environment: a case study of Ecuador. In: Blackman A (ed) Small firms and the environment in developing countries: collective impacts, collective action. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, pp 7–71
Luken R, van Rompaey F (2008) Drivers for and barriers to environmentally sound technology adoption by manufacturing plants in nine developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 16s1:s67–s77
Mansfield E (1968) Industrial research and technological innovation. Norton, New York
Milliman S, Prince R (1989) Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17:247–265
Montalvo C (2002) Environmental policy and technological innovation: why do firms adopt or reject new technologies? Edward Elgar, London
Pindyck R (1991) Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature 29:1110–1152
Rahm MR, Huffamn WE (1984) The adoption of reduced tillage: the role of human capital and other variables. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66:405–413
Ramírez O, Shultz S (2000) Poisson count models to explain the adoption of agricultural and natural resource management technologies by small farmers in Central American countries. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 32:21–33
Rauniyar GP (1998) Adoption of management and technological practices by fishpond operators in Nepal. Aquaculture Economics and Management 2:89–99
Rodriguez M (2005) La industria de la curtiduría contaminó el sistemsa hidráulico de León: ecologistas (The tanning industry contaminates the hydrological system of León: ecologists). La Jornada (UNAM). http://www.jourada.unam.mx/2005/07/13/035nlest.php. Accessed 2 Jul 2010
Salazar G (2008) Economía ecológia frente a economía industrial: el caso de la industria de la curtiduría en México (Ecological economics versus industrial economics: the case of the tanning industry in Mexico). Argumentos 21:55–71
Thorstensen T (1997) Pollution prevention and control for small tanneries. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association 92:245–255
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) (1991) Tanneries and the environment: a technical guide. UNEP, Paris
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (2004) The industrial development report, industrialization, environment and the millennium development goals in sub-Saharan Africa: the new frontier in the fight against poverty. UNIDO, Vienna
World Bank (1992) World development report: development and the environment. World Bank, Washington, DC
World Bank (2000) Greening industry: new roles for communities, markets and governments. Oxford University Press, New York
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York
Wozniak GD (1984) The adoption of interrelated innovations: a human capital approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 66:70–79
Wu J, Babcock BA (1998) The choice of tillage rotation and soil testing practices: economic and environmental implications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:494–511
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Blackman, A., Kildegaard, A. Clean technological change in developing-country industrial clusters: Mexican leather tanning. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 12, 115–132 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0164-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-010-0164-7