Scope of the essay
Framing groundwater assessment and management processes
Social science and participatory processes in groundwater management
-
Groundwater systems that are already subject to significant physical depletion and/or quality degradation, where there is an urgent need to support stakeholders around the agreement and implementation of a ‘sustainability intervention plan’, which will involve significant modification to existing groundwater withdrawals and land use in the longer term common interests of the entire community
-
Groundwater systems that are only subject to light anthropogenic stress, where the need will be to find social mechanisms to define and adopt ‘managed development plans’
Enabling institutional framework for participatory groundwater management
-
Sustained funding from public sources, groundwater abstraction charges or external sources
-
Functioning, or at least supportive, legal authority within the provincial and national institutional framework for water resources management
-
Securing and sustaining political interest and support
-
Seeking active engagement and representation of all relevant stakeholders, including representatives of ‘vulnerable groups’ and of ‘environmental interests’ in decision making, and not isolating local stakeholders from higher-level governance
-
Institutionalized, structured and transparent processes to facilitate evidence development, dialogue and decision making on key issues and potential conflicts
-
Continuously building stakeholder knowledge and capacity for proactive participation in groundwater management, so as to create public ownership of the shared resource and compliance with agreed rules and regulations
Lessons learned and recommendations for the scientific community
-
The concept of ‘participation’ has a wide range of facets, and scientific contributions range from case studies reporting on an actual participatory process to more generic considerations of communication and knowledge transfer, or suggestions for a complete framework for participatory approaches
-
The uniqueness of the experiences presented was striking—no two case studies used the same strategy, with major differences depending on environmental problems addressed, scale of issue (from village to national level), and level of capacity and experience with proactive management of groundwater.
-
Who should push for (stronger) participation and how does this affect the outcome, sustainability and integrated benefits of the process?
-
Which types of external involvement (information, facilitation, financing, etc.) are most successful in which context?
-
Who should assume which role in the process; what are the incentives to assume various roles, and how can roles be adjusted to meet the goals of the process?
-
What is the most feasible way to communicate and integrate uncertainties within highly complex systems and anticipated long-term impacts of management actions into decision-making?
-
Which approaches have been successful in given hydrogeological and societal contexts, and what aspects are universal and can be transferred and up-scaled?