Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy
Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 3/2013

01.06.2013 | Original Paper

Hydrogen from renewable palm kernel shell via enhanced gasification with low carbon dioxide emission

verfasst von: Tigabwa Yosef Ahmed, Murni Melati Ahmad, Hon Loong Lam, Suzana Yusup

Erschienen in: Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Hydrogen economy has become more attractive with the energy crises and environmental issues associated with fossil fuel utilization more so with the discovery that hydrogen can be produced from renewable biomass. This provides good prospects to Malaysia that generates abundant palm wastes. Nevertheless, there is still limited knowledge on kinetics parameters for hydrogen production from palm kernel shell (PKS) gasification. Hence, this work aims to develop a mathematical model that is able to describe the kinetics of steam gasification of PKS with in situ CO2 capture while considering tar formation. A mean-squared error minimization approach has been used to estimate the kinetics parameters of the gasification process. Using the calculated kinetics parameters the process efficiencies are profiled with respect to the effect of gasification temperature, steam/biomass ratio and sorbent/biomass ratio. The parametric study indicates that the three variables promote hydrogen production at different degree of influence. This developed model can be further extended to incorporate optimization study on the potential clean production of hydrogen from PKS.
Vorheriger Artikel Hydrogen for oil refining via biomass indirect steam gasification: energy and environmental targets
Nächster Artikel Comparison of ecological footprint for biobased PHA production from animal residues utilizing different energy resources

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
Abanades JC, Anthony EJ, Lu DY, Salvador C, Alvarez D (2004) Capture of CO2 from combustion gases in a fluidized bed of CaO. AIChE J 50:1614–1622CrossRef
Abuadala A, Dincer I (2010) Investigation of a multi-generation system using a hybrid steam biomass gasification for hydrogen, power and heat. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:13146–13157CrossRef
Acharya B, Dutta A, Basu P (2010) An investigation into steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen enriched gas production in presence of CaO. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:1582–1589CrossRef
Ahmed I, Gupta AK (2009) Syngas yield during pyrolysis and steam gasification of paper. Appl Energy 86:1813–1821CrossRef
Ahmed TY, Ahmad MM, Yusup S, Inayat A, Khan Z (2012) Mathematical and computational approaches for design of biomass gasification for hydrogen production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2304–2315CrossRef
Ar I, Dogu G (2001) Calcination kinetics of high purity limestones. Chem Eng J 83:131–137CrossRef
Babu BV, Sheth PN (2006) Modeling and simulation of reduction zone of downdraft biomass gasifier: effect of char reactivity factor. Energy Convers Manag 47:2602–2611CrossRef
Basu P, Kaushal P (2009) Modeling of pyrolysis and gasification of biomass in fluidized beds: a review. Chem Prod Process Model 4:1–45
Blasi CD (1998) Comparison of semi-global mechanisms for primary pyrolysis of lignocellulosic fuels. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 47:43–64CrossRef
Choi YC, Li XY, Park TJ, Kim JH, Lee JG (2001) Numerical study on the coal gasification characteristics in an entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel 80:2193–2201CrossRef
Corella J, Sanz A (2005) Modeling circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: a pseudo-rigorous model for stationary state. Fuel Process Technol 86:1021–1053CrossRef
Corella J, Herguido J, Gonzalez-Saiz J (1989) Steam gasification of biomass in fluidized bed effect of the type of feedstock. In: Ferrero GL, Maniatis K, Buekens A, Bridgwater AV (eds) Pyrolysis and gasifications. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 618–623
Fiaschi D, Michelini M (2001) A two-phase one-dimensional biomass gasification kinetics model. Biomass Bioenergy 21:121–132CrossRef
Florin N, Harris AT (2007) Hydrogen production from biomass. Environmentalist 27:207–215CrossRef
Florin NH, Harris AT (2008) Enhanced hydrogen production from biomass with in situ carbon dioxide capture using calcium oxide sorbents. Chem Eng Sci 63:287–316
Gao N, Li A (2008) Modeling and simulation of combined pyrolysis and reduction zone for a downdraft biomass gasifier. Energy Convers Manag 49:3483–3490CrossRef
Gerber MA (2007) Review of novel catalysts for biomass tar cracking and methane reforming. U.S. Department of Energy, Report No. PNNL-16950
Gil J, Corella J, Aznar MP, Caballero MA (1999) Biomass gasification in atmospheric and bubbling fluidized bed: effect of the type of gasifying agent on the product distribution. Biomass Bioenergy 17:389–403CrossRef
Giltrap DL, Mckibbin R, Barnes GRG (2003) A steady state model of gas–char reactions in a downdraft biomass gasifier. Sol Energy 74:85–91CrossRef
Gordillo ED, Belghit A (2011) A two phase model of high temperature steam-only gasification of biomass char in bubbling fluidized bed reactors using nuclear heat. Int J Hydrogen Energy 36:374–381CrossRef
Hamel S, Krumm W (2001) Mathematical modelling and simulation of bubbling fluidised bed gasifiers. Powder Technol 120:105–112CrossRef
He J, Göransson K, Söderlind U, Zhang W (2012) Simulation of biomass gasification in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Convers Biorefin 2:1–10CrossRef
Katayamaa S, Suzukia M, Tsutsumia A (2006) Reaction mechanism of tar evolution in biomass steam gasification for hydrogen production. WHEC 16:1–8
Kaushal P, Abedi J, Mahinpey N (2010) A comprehensive mathematical model for biomass gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 89:3650–3661CrossRef
Khan Z, Yusup S, Ahmad MM, Ramli A, Arpin MT, Abdullah SS, Mohamad MF, Misi SEE, Inayat A (2011) Effect of steam and catalyst on palm oil wastes thermal decomposition for hydrogen production. Res J Chem Environ 15:466–472
Li C, Suzuki K (2010) Process design and simulation of H2-rich gases production from biomass pyrolysis process. Bioresour Technol 101:586–590CrossRef
Li J, Yin Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Yan R (2009) Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification of palm oil wastes over supported tri-metallic catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34:9108–9115CrossRef
Luangkiattikhun P, Tangsathitkulchai C, Tangsathitkulchai M (2008) Non-isothermal thermogravimetric analysis of oil-palm solid wastes. Bioresour Technol 99:986–997CrossRef
Mahishi MR, Goswami DY (2007) Thermodynamic optimization of biomass gasifier for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:3831–3840CrossRef
Miao Q, Zhu J, Barghi S, Wu C, Yin X, Zhou Z (2013) Modeling biomass gasification in circulating fluidized beds. Renew Energy 50:655–661CrossRef
Mohammed MAA, Salmiaton A, Wan Azlina WAKG, Mohammad Amran MS, Fakhrul-Razi A, Taufiq-Yap YH (2011) Hydrogen rich gas from oil palm biomass as a potential source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:1258–1270CrossRef
Nikoo MB, Mahinpey N (2008) Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1245–1254CrossRef
Paasen SVB, Kiel JHA (2004) Tar formation in fluidized-bed gasification—impact of gasifier operating conditions. In: The 2nd world conference and technology exhibition on biomass for energy, industry and climate protection, Rome, Italy, pp 130–138
Paviet F, Chazarency F, Tazeroutz M (2009) Thermochemical equilibrium modelling of a biomass gasifying process using ASPEN PLUS. Int J Chem React Eng 7:1–16
Petersen I, Werther J (2005) Experimental investigation and modeling of gasification of sewage sludge in the circulating fluidized bed. Chem Eng Process 44:717–736CrossRef
Puig-Arnavat M, Bruno JC, Coronas A (2012) Modified thermodynamic equilibrium model for biomass gasification: a study of the influence of operating conditions. Energy Fuel 26:1385–1394CrossRef
Radmanesh R, Chaouki J, Guy C (2006) Biomass gasification in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor: experiments and modeling. AIChE J 52:4258–4272CrossRef
Sadaka SS, Ghaly AE, Sabbah MA (2002) Two phase biomass air–steam gasification model for fluidized bed reactors: Part I—model development. Biomass Bioenergy 22:439–462CrossRef
Sheth PN, Babu BV (2006) Kinetic modeling of pyrolysis of biomass. In: Proceedings of national conference on environmental conservation (NCEC-2006), BITS-Pilani, 1–3 September, pp 453–458
Swierczyski D, Libs S, Courson C, Kiennemann A (2007) Steam reforming of tar from a biomass gasification process over Ni/olivine catalyst using toluene as a model compound. Appl Catal B 74:211–222CrossRef
Thurner F, Mann U (1981) Kinetic investigation of wood pyrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 20:882–888CrossRef
Wang Y, Chao Z, Jakobsen HA (2011) Numerical study of hydrogen production by the sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming process with online CO2 capture as operated in fluidized bed reactors. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:559–565CrossRef
Wei L, Xu S, Zhang L, Liu C, Zhu H, Liu S (2007) Steam gasification of biomass for hydrogen-rich gas in a free-fall reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy 32:24–31CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hydrogen from renewable palm kernel shell via enhanced gasification with low carbon dioxide emission
verfasst von
Tigabwa Yosef Ahmed
Murni Melati Ahmad
Hon Loong Lam
Suzana Yusup
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1618-954X
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-9558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0606-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Perspective

Process Intensification and Integration: an assessment

Original Paper

Optimization of water network integrated with process models

Original Paper

Combined design and load shifting for distributed energy system

Original Paper

Hydrogen for oil refining via biomass indirect steam gasification: energy and environmental targets

Original Paper

Numerical analysis of cement calciner fuel efficiency and pollutant emissions

Original Paper

Retrofit process heat transfer enhancement to upgrade performance, throughput and reduced energy use