Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Simulating resistances in innovation diffusion over multiple generations: an agent-based approach for fuel-cell vehicles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Central European Journal of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Innovation resistances play a major role in innovation diffusion, as they do not only hinder the adoption, but might also change a decision maker’s evaluation. Although these influences are widely accepted, previous models on the diffusion of new technologies and products have either reduced these multiple dimensions of uncertainties to only one parameter, or have completely neglected them altogether. Both might lead to a pro-innovation bias. Therefore we present an agent-based approach that takes several different innovation resistances in a multi-generation environment into account. Hydrogen vehicles and the necessity of setting up a corresponding infrastructure were chosen for a sample application as they incorporate a band of various dimensions of innovation resistance. Examples are the uncertain infrastructure situation, the uncertainty arising from new and improved features, the uncertainty about the technologies’ real ecological benefit, the unknown maintenance cycles and costs, or the ambiguous technical parameters such as vehicle range. These various uncertainties are even more distinctive if multiple technology generations are considered. Our results indicate that a short-term decrease in the adoption rate can be observed although the technological parameters of a later product generation might be more beneficial for the consumers. As we show, this effect can be eased through timing variation of the communication measures. Therefore we conclude that considering multiple innovation resistance factors in innovation diffusion might reduce the pro-innovation bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1987) Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Rev Econ Stat 69(4):567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amini M, Wakolbinger T, Racer M, Nejad M (2012) Alternative supply chain production-sales policies for new product diffusion: an agent-based modelling and simulation approach. Eur J Oper Res 216:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson BF, Deane DH, Hammond KR, Mc Clelland GH (1981) Concepts in judgment and decision research. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manag Sci 15(5):215–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass FM (2004) Comments on “a new product growth model for consumer durables”. Manag Sci 50:1833–1840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosshardt M, Ulli-Beer S, Gassmann F, Wokaun A (2007) Developing a diffusion model of competing alternative drive-train technologies (cadt-model). In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference of thy system dynamics society, 2007 Boston, USA

  • Bouza M, Ulli-Beer S, Dietrich PH, Wokaun A (2009) Comparison of possible transformation processes in the automotive industry. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference of the system dynamics society, Albuquerque, NM, USA. The System Dynamics Society

  • Cantono S, Silverberg G (2008) A percolation model of eco-innovation diffusion: the relationship between diffusion, learning economies and subsidies. Technol Forecast Soc Change 76(4):487–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chanda U, Bardhan AK (2008) Modelling innovation and imitation sales of products with multiple technological generations. J High Technol Manag Res 18:173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chunjie C, Tieju M, Fujin N (2012) Technology/infrastructure diffusion of natural gas vehicles: the case of Shanghai. Int J Energy Sect Manag 6:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa LDF, Rodrigues FA, Travieso G, Villas BP (2007) Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements. Adv Phys 56:167–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher PJ, Hardie BGS, Putsis WP (2001) Marketing-mix variable and the diffusion of successive generations of a technological innovation. J Mark Res 38(4):501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Fleur ML (1966) Theories of mass communication. McKay, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen PS, Bearden WO, Sharma S (1991) Resistance to technological innovations: an examination of the role of self-efficiancy and performance satisfaction. J Acad Mark Sci 19(4):297–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewinga GO, Sarigöllüb E (1998) Car fuel-type choice under travel demand management and economic incentives. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 3(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourt LA, Woodlock JW (1960) Early prediction of market success for grocery products. J Mark 25(4):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski PA (2000) Models of technology diffusion. Res Policy 29:603–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg J, Libai B, Moldovan S, Muller E (2007) The npv of bad news. Int J Res Mark 24:186–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM, Wildpaner M (2011) An agent-based simulation approach for the new product diffusion of a novel biomass fuel. J Oper Res Soc 62:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen A, Lienin SF, Gassmann F, Wokaun A (2006) Model aided policy development for the market penetration of natural gas vehicles in Switzerland. Transp Res Part A 40:316–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Jain DC (2012) A generalized Norton–Bass model for multigeneration diffusion. Manag Sci 58(10):1887–1897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RJ, Scicchitano MJ (2000) Uncertainty, risk, trust, and information: public perceptions of environmental issues and willingness to take action. Policy Stud J 28:633–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun DB, Park YS (1999) A choice-based diffusion model for multiple generations of products. Technol Forecast Soc Change 61(1):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun E, Jeong YH, Chang SH (2008) Simulation of the market penetration of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Korea. Int J Energy Res 32:318–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keelin TW (1981) A parametric representation of additive value functions. Manag Sci 27(10):1200–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keles D, Wietschel M, Möst D, Rentz O (2008) Market penetration of fuel cell vehicles—analysis based on agent behaviour. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:4444–4455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM (2012) Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Cent Eur J Oper Res 20(2):183–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köhler J, Whitmarsh L, Nyvkvist B, Schilperoord M (2009) A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecol Econ 68:2985–2995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaver J, Gillingham K (2010) Economic impact of the integration of alternative vehicle technologies into the New Zealand vehicle fleet. J Clean Prod 18:908–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V, Muller E, Kerin RA (1984) Introduction strategy for new products with positive and negative word-of-mouth. Manag Sci 30(12):1389–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V, Muller E (1996) Timing, diffusion, and substitution of successive generations of technological innovations: the IBM mainframe case. Technol Forecast Soc Change 51(2):109–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield E (1961) Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29(4):741–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier FH (1998) New product diffusion models in innovation management: a system dynamics perspective. Syst Dyn Rev 14(4):285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merino DN (1990) Development of a technological s-curve for tire cord textiles. Technol Forecast Soc Change 37(3):275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer PE, Winebrake JJ (2009) Modelling technology diffusion of complementary goods: the case of hydrogen vehicles and refueling infrastructure. Technovation 29:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalakelis C, Varoutas D, Sphicopoulos T (2010) Innovation diffusion with generation substitution effects. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(4):541–557

  • Mukherjee A, Hoyer W (2001) The effect of novel attributes on product evaluation. J Consum Res 28:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton JA, Bass FM (1987) A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations. Manag Sci 33(9):1069–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton JA, Bass FM (1992) Evolution of technological generations: the law of capture. Sloan Manag Rev 33(2):66–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostlund LE (1974) Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovations. J Consum Res 1:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park SY, Kim JW, Lee DH (2011) Development of a market penetration forecasting model for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles considering infrastructure and cost reduction effects. Energy Policy 39:3307–3315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram S (1989) Successful innovation using strategies to reduce consumer resistance. J Prod Innov Manag 6:20–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram S, Sheth JN (1989) Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. J Consum Mark 6:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson TS (1971) Innovative behavior and communication. Holt, Reinhard & Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1976) New product adoption and diffusion. J Consum Res 2:290–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, Simon & Schuster Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santa Eulalia LA, Neumann D, Klasen J (2011) A simulation-based innovation forecasting approach combining the Bass diffusion model, the discrete choice model and system dynamics, In: IARIA (ed) The third international conference on advances in system simulation, 2011 Barcelona, Spain

  • Schade B, Schade W (2005) Evaluating economic feasibility and technical progress of environmentally sustainable transport scenarios by a backcasting approach with ESCOT. Transp Rev 6:647–668

  • Schneider MT, Schade B, Grupp H (2004) Innovation process ’fuel cell vehicle’: what strategy promises to be most successful? Technol Anal Strateg Manag 16:147–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwoon M (2006) Simulating the adoption of fuel cell vehicles. J Evolut Econ 16:435–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwoon M (2007) A tool to optimize the initial distribution of hydrogen filling stations. Contributions to the research unit sustainability and global change, Hamburg, Germany

  • Schwoon M (2008) Learning by doing, learning spillovers and the diffusion of fuel cell vehicles. Simul Modell Pract Theory 16:1463–1476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiei E, Stefansson H, Asgeirsson EI, Davidsdottir B, Raberto M (2013) Integrated agent-based and system dynamics modelling for simulation of sustainable mobility. Transp Rev 33(1):44–70

  • Shepherd F, Bonsall P, Harrison G (2012) Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: a model based study. Transp Policy 20:62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth JN (1981) Psychology of innovation resistance: the less developed concept (LDC) in diffusion research. Res Mark 4:273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Speece MW, McClachlan DL (1995) Application of a multi-generation diffusion model to milk container technology. Technol Forecast Soc Change 49:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelonline.de (2013) Alternative Antriebe: Daimler schließt Brennstoffzellen-Kooperation. http://www.spiegel.de/auto/aktuell/a-880080.html. Accessed 27 Dec 2013

  • Stann I (1993) Fuel cells—realizing the potential. Power Eng J 7:94–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan C, Sullivan J (2004) An agent-based hydrogen vehicle/infrastructure model. Contributions to the congress of evolutionary computation, Dearborn, MI, USA, pp 1774–1779

  • Stoneman P, Diederen P (1994) Technology diffusion and public policy. Econ J 104:918–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struben J, Sterman JD (2008) Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environ Plan B Plan Des 35:1070–1097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stummer C, Kiesling E, Günther M, Vetschera R (forthcoming) Innovation diffusion of repeat purchase products in a competitive market: an agent-based simulation approach. Eur J Oper Res. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715002015

  • Tran M (2012) Agent-behavior and network influence on energy innovation diffusion. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17:3682–3695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vooren A, Alkemade F (2012) Managing the diffusion of low emission vehicles. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 59:728–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet O, de Vries B, Faaij A, Turkenburg W, Jager W (2010) Multi-agent simulation of adoption of alternative fuels. Transp Res Part D 15:326–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakolbinger LM, Stummer C, Günther M (2013) Market introduction and diffusion of new products: recent developments in agent-based modelling. Int J Innov Technol Manag 10:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther G, Wonsart J, Kieckhäfer K, Schnieder E, Spengler T (2010) Impact assessment in the automotive industry: mandatory market introduction of alternative powertrain technologies. Syst Dyn Rev 26:239–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber T (2003) Innovationen auf der nächsten S-Kurve - Das Beispiel der Brennstoffzelle. In: Hungenberg H, Meffert J (eds) Handbuch strategisches management, 2nd edn. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 541–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch C (2006) Lessons learned from alternative transportation fuels: modelling transition dynamics, technical report NREL/TP-540-39446. U.S. Department of Energy, Colorado, USA

  • Zhang T, Gensler S, Garcia R (2011) A study of the diffusion of alternative fuel vehicles: an agent-based modelling approach. J Prod Innov Manag 28:152–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Institute for Operations Research, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577, Neubiberg, Germany

    Martin Zsifkovits

  2. Department of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, Universitätsstraße 25, 33615, Bielefeld, Germany

    Markus Günther

Authors
  1. Martin Zsifkovits
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Günther
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Zsifkovits.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zsifkovits, M., Günther, M. Simulating resistances in innovation diffusion over multiple generations: an agent-based approach for fuel-cell vehicles. Cent Eur J Oper Res 23, 501–522 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0391-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-015-0391-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation