Abstract
Designing assembly instructions is mostly considered to be a non-designer task. Hence, in many companies, it is performed by production planners or instructional designers. However, analysing product components and looking for clues on how these components can be fitted together into a subassembly or final product is a fundamental part of assembly. Product designers play an important role in the way these components are perceived by the operator. This paper discusses the need and importance of a new approach to product design focused on how the assembly design can promote meaning to the operator, supporting operator cognition. The aim of this approach was to guide assembly operators more intuitively through their increasingly complex tasks. Doing so will allow them to avoid some of the major drawbacks that are present when using procedural instructions. Hence, this approach has the potential to decrease cognitive load and frustration, and increase mental wellbeing, work motivation and efficiency. As a first step towards this new approach, a conceptual framework is constructed, and insights are formulated after reviewing various design theories and concepts of design for meaning on their potential in a context of manual assembly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawala M, Phan D, Heiser J et al (2003) Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions. ACM Trans Graph 22:828–837. https://doi.org/10.1145/882262.882352
Baber C, Parekh M, Cengiz TG (2014) Tool use as distributed cognition: how tools help, hinder and define manual skill. Front Psychol 5:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00116
Bley H, Reinhart G, Seliger G et al (2004) Appropriate human involvement in assembly and disassembly. CIRP Ann Technol 53:487–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60026-2
Boess S, Kanis H (2008) Meaning in product use: a design perspective. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, New York, pp 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50015-0
Booker JD, Swift KG, Brown NJ (2005) Designing for assembly quality: strategies, guidelines and techniques. J Eng Des 16:279–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820500126672
Boothroyd G (1994) Product design for manufacture and assembly. Comput Des 26:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(94)90082-5
Brolin A, Thorvald P, Case K (2017) Experimental study of cognitive aspects affecting human performance in manual assembly. Prod Manuf Res 5:141–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2017.1374893
Carroll JM (1990) The Nurnberg funnel: designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. MIT Press, Cambridge
Castro-Alonso JC, Ayres P, Paas F (2016) Comparing apples and oranges? A critical look at research on learning from statics versus animations. Comput Educ 102:234–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.004
Chandler P, Sweller J (1991) Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cogn Instr 8:293–332. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
Chandler P, Sweller J (1992) The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. Br J Educ Psychol 62:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1992.tb01017.x
Chandler P, Sweller J (1996) Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program. Appl Cogn Psychol 10:151–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199604)10:2%3c151:aid-acp380%3e3.0.co;2-u
Claeys A, Hoedt S, Soete N et al (2015) Framework for evaluating cognitive support in mixed model assembly systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48:924–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.201
Cormier P, Olewnik A (2014) Toward a formalization of affordance modeling for engineering design. Res Eng Des 25:259–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0179-3
Crilly N, Maier A, Clarkson PJ (2008) Representing artefacts as media: modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience. Int J Des 2:15–27
Dadashi N, Golightly D, Sharples S (2017) Seeing the woods for the trees: the problem of information inefficiency and information overload on operator performance. Cogn Technol Work 19:561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0451-1
Desmet PMA, Hekkert P (2002) The Basis of Product Emotions. In: Green W, Jordan P (eds) Pleasure with products, beyond usability. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 60–68
Eiriksdottir E, Catrambone R (2011) Procedural instructions, principles, and examples: how to structure instructions for procedural tasks to enhance performance, learning, and transfer. Hum Factors 53:749–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811419154
Elmaraghy W, Elmaraghy H, Tomiyama T, Monostori L (2012) Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:793–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001
Erol S, Jäger A, Hold P et al (2016) Tangible industry 4.0: a scenario-based approach to learning for the future of production. Proc CIRP 54:13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.162
Fast-Berglund Å, Fässberg T, Hellman F et al (2013) Relations between complexity, quality and cognitive automation in mixed-model assembly. J Manuf Syst 32:449–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.04.011
Fu W, Gray WD (2006) Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking. Cogn Psychol 52:195–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.08.002
Ganier F (2004) Factors affecting the processing of procedural instructions: implications for document design. IEEE Trans Prof Commun 47:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2004.824289
Ganier F, De Vries P (2016) Are instructions in video format always better than photographs when learning manual techniques? The case of learning how to do sutures. Learn Instr 44:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.03.004
Gaver W (1991) Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Miffin, Boston
Ginns P (2006) Integrating information: a meta-analysis of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learn Instr 16:511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
Heiser J, Phan D, Agrawala M, et al (2004) Identification and validation of cognitive design principles for automated generation of assembly instructions. In: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces. ACM, pp 311–319
Hekkert P, Cila N (2015) Handle with care! Why and how designers make use of product metaphors. Des Stud 40:196–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.06.007
Höffler TN, Leutner D (2007) Instructional animation versus static pictures: a meta-analysis. Learn Instr 17:722–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.013
Hollnagel E (2012) Coping with complexity: past, present and future. Cogn Technol Work Work 14:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0202-7
Hu SJ, Zhu X, Wang H, Koren Y (2008) Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:45–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.03.138
Huff M, Bauhoff V, Schwan S (2012) Effects of split attention revisited: a new display technology for troubleshooting tasks. Comput Hum Behav 28:1254–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.008
Johansson PEC, Enofe MO, Schwarzkopf M et al (2017a) Data and information handling in assembly information systems—a current state analysis. Proc Manuf 11:2099–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.335
Johansson PEC, Eriksson G, Johansson P et al (2017b) Assessment based information needs in manual assembly. In: DEStech transactions on engineering and technology research (Icpr), pp 366–371
Judge TA, Heller D, Mount MK (2002) Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 87:530–541. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.3.530
Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Sweller J (1998) Levels of expertise and instructional design. Hum Factors 40:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480587
Kalyuga S, Chandler P, Sweller J (2004) When redundant on-screen text in multimedia technical instruction can interfere with learning. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 46:567–581. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.3.567.1640
Kapkin E (2015) Meaning attribution model of product forms: a holistic approach. North Carolina State University, North Carolina
Kirsh D (1995) The intelligent use of space. Artif Intell 73:31–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U
Klein G (2008) Naturalistic decision making. Hum Factors 50:456–460. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008x288385
Knapheide C (2000) Synergy and subsidiarity: the systematic determination of software, user, and operating instructions. Int J Hum Comput Interact 12:415–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2000.9669068
Krippendorff K (1989) On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that “design is making sense (of things)”. Des Issues 5:9–39. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512
Krippendorff K, Butter R (1984) Product semantics: exploring the symbolic qualities of form. Innovation 3(2):4–9
Krippendorff K, Butter R (1993) Where meanings escape functions. Des Manag J 4:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1948-7169.1993.tb00134.x
Krippendorff K, Butter R (2008) Semantics: meanings and contexts of artifacts. In: Schifferstein HNJ, Hekkert P (eds) Product experience. Elsevier, New York, pp 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50017-4
Kroes P (2002) Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts. Des Stud 23:287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00039-4
Loch F, Quint F, Brishtel I (2016) Comparing video and augmented reality assistance in manual assembly. In: Proceedings—12th international conference on intelligent environments, IE 2016, pp 147–150
Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A (2017) Smart operators in industry 4.0: a human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Comput Ind Eng 113:144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016
Lu J, Cheng L (2013) Perceiving and interacting affordances: a new model of human–affordance interactions. Integr Psychol Behav Sci 47:142–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-012-9202-2
Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2009) Affordance based design: a relational theory for design. Res Eng Des 20:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3
Matthews G, Campbell SE, Falconer S et al (2002) Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. Emotion 2:315–340. https://doi.org/10.1037//1528-3542.2.4.315
Mattsson S, Fast-Berglund A (2016) How to support intuition in complex assembly? Proc CIRP 50:624–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.05.014
Mattsson S, Karlsson M, Fast-Berglund Å, Hansson I (2014) Managing production complexity by empowering workers: six cases. In: Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., pp 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.041
Mattsson S, Fasth Berglund Å, Li D, Thorvald P (2018) Forming a cognitive automation strategy for Operator 4.0 in complex assembly. Comput Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.011
McGrath JE (1976) Stress and behavior in organizations. In: Dunnette, Marvin D (eds) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally & Co, Chicago, pp 1351–1396
Mowday RT, Porter LW, Steers RM (2013) Employee—organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press, Cambridge
Norman D (1988) The psychology of everyday things. Basic books, New York
Norman D (1999) Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions 6:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168
Osiurak F, Badets A (2016) Tool use and affordance: manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches. Psychol Rev 123:534–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000027
Parmentier DD, Detand J, Saldien J (2019) Designing products with a focus on self-explanatory assembly, a case study. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on engineering design (ICED19), pp 2081–2090. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.214
Pine BJ (1993) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Pols AJK (2012) Characterising affordances: the descriptions-of-affordances-model. Des Stud 33:113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.007
Radkowski R, Herrema J, Oliver J (2015) Augmented reality-based manual assembly support with visual features for different degrees of difficulty. Int J Hum Comput Interact 31:337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.994194
Rasmussen J (2000) Human factors in a dynamic information society: where are we heading? Ergonomics 43:869–879. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300409071
Re GM, Oliver J, Bordegoni M (2016) Impact of monitor-based augmented reality for on-site industrial manual operations. Cogn Technol Work 18:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-016-0365-3
Redström J, Grauers H (2006) Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design. Des Stud 27:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.06.001
Rettig M (1991) Nobody reads documentation. Commun ACM 34:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/105783.105788
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
Schuh G, Anderl R, Gausemeier J, ten Hompel M, Wahlster W (eds) (2017) Industrie 4.0 Maturity Index. Managing the digital transformation of companies (acatech STUDY), Herbert Utz Verlag, Munich
Schumacher P (2007) Creating effective illustrations for pictorial assembly instructions. Inf Des J 15:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.15.2.01sch
Schumacher P (2013) A pattern language for pictorial assembly instructions (PAIs). Inf Des J 20:111–135. https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.20.2.03sch
Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Siu KWM (2003) Users’ creative responses and designers’ roles. Des Issues 19:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793603765201424
Stoffregen TA, Mantel B (2015) Exploratory movement and affordances in design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 29:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060415000190
Stork S, Schubö A (2010) Human cognition in manual assembly: theories and applications. Adv Eng Inform 24:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2010.05.010
Sweller J, van Merrienboer JJG, Paas FG (1998) Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 10:251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022193728205
Syberfeldt A, Danielsson O, Holm M, Wang L (2015) Visual assembling guidance using augmented reality. Proc Manuf 1:98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.09.068
Um J, Lyons A, Lam HKS et al (2017) Product variety management and supply chain performance: a capability perspective on their relationships and competitiveness implications. Int J Prod Econ 187:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.005
Van Acker BB, Parmentier DD, Vlerick P, Saldien J (2018) Understanding mental workload: from a clarifying concept analysis toward an implementable framework. Cogn Technol Work 20:351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0481-3
Vanderhaegen F, Carsten O (2017) Can dissonance engineering improve risk analysis of human–machine systems? Cogn Technol Work 19:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0405-7
Vera D, Crossan M, Rerup C, Werner S (2014) “Thinking before acting” or “acting before thinking”: antecedents of individual action propensity in work situations. J Manag Stud 51:603–633. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12075
Vicente KJ (1999) Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Vihma S (1995) Products as representations: a semiotic and aesthetic study of design products, 1st edn. University of Art and Design Helsinki, Helsinki
Wan X, Sanders NR (2017) The negative impact of product variety: forecast bias, inventory levels, and the role of vertical integration. Int J Prod Econ 186:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.002
Whittington JL, Meskelis S, Asare E, Beldona S (2017) Creating meaning in work through job enrichment. Enhancing employee engagement. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, pp 43–51
Wieringa D, Moore C, Barnes V (1998) Procedure writing: principles and practices. In: IEEE
Wilson JR, Corlett EN (1995) Evaluation of human work: A practical ergonomics methodology, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, London
Wong A, Marcus N, Ayres P et al (2009) Instructional animations can be superior to statics when learning human motor skills. Comput Hum Behav 25:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.012
You H, Chen K, Kung NC (2007) Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Des Stud 28:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002
Young M, Brookhuis K, Wickens C, Hancock P (2015) State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.956151
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parmentier, D.D., Van Acker, B.B., Detand, J. et al. Design for assembly meaning: a framework for designers to design products that support operator cognition during the assembly process. Cogn Tech Work 22, 615–632 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00588-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-019-00588-x