Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The transition in Dutch water management

  • Original article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decades, the Dutch people have been confronted with severe water-related problems, which are the result of an unsustainable water system, arising from human interventions in the physical infrastructure of the water system and the water management style. The claims of housing, industry, infrastructure and agriculture have resulted in increasing pressure on the water system. The continuous subsidence of soil and climate change has put pressure on the land. Hence, the nature and magnitude of water-related problems have changed. Longitudinal research of relevant national policy documents reveals that the water management regime has changed its water management style over the past 30 years from a technocratic scientific style towards an integral and participatory style. We have investigated if the historical development in Dutch Water management can be characterized as a transition. Based on longitudinal research through an integrated systems analysis, document research and expert interviews, we have reconstructed the historical narrative by using the transition concepts of multi-level and multi-phase. This research indicates that the shift in Dutch Water management can be characterized as a transition. This transition is currently in the take-off stage and near the acceleration stage. This is a crucial stage as long as the considerable gap between the strategic macro-vision and the practical implementation at the micro-level remains. As long as these levels are not compatible (modulation), the transition will not be completed successfully. Transition management as multi-level governance model should therefore be adopted to facilitate the modulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkhout F, Smith A, Stirling A (2003) Socio-technical regimes and transitions contexts. SPRU electronic working paper series

  • Bosch A, van der Ham W (1998) Twee eeuwen Rijkswaterstaat, 1798–1990. (Two centuries Rijkswaterstaat, 1798–1990). Europese Bibliotheek, Zaltbommel

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruijn D, Hamhuis D, van Nieuwenhuijze L, Overmars W, Sijmons D, Vera F (1987) Ooievaar: De toekomst van het Rivierengebied. (Ooievaar: the future of the riverland). Gelderse Milieufederatie. Arnhem, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • CW21 (2000) Anders Omgaan met Water. Waterbeleid voor de 21e eeuw. (Dealing Differently with Water, Water management for the 21st century). Committee Tielrooy, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water management/Union of Waterboards. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Dirven J, Rotmans J, Verkaik AP (2002) Samenleving in transitie, een vernieuwend gezichtpunt. (Society in Transition: an Innovative Viewpoint). Essay, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels F, Kemp R (2000) Transities vanuit sociotechnisch perspectief (Transitions from a sociotechnical perspective). Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ham W (1999) Heersen en Beheersen, Rijkswaterstaat in de twintigste eeuw. (Rule and Control, Rijkswaterstaat in the 20th century). European Library, Zaltbommel, The Netherlands

  • Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through the process of niche formation. The approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 10(2):175–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintsen H (2002) Two centuries of central water management in the Netherlands. Technol Cult 43:549–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2004) Managing transitions for Sustainable Development. In: Wieczorek AJ, Olsthoorn X (eds) Industrial Transformation - Disciplinary approaches towards transformation research. Kluwer, The Netherlands, Forthcoming

  • Martens P, Rotmans J (2002) Transition in a globalising world. Swets & Zeitlinger BV Lisse, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert E (2003) The Challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5(2):179–197

    Google Scholar 

  • NRLO (2000) Over Stromen: Kennis en Innovatie opgaven voor een Waterrijk Nederland (About floods: knowledge and innovation for water), NRLO-rapport 2000/04. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Participative and stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and modeling Processes. Integr Assess 3(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1964) Eerste nota Waterhuishouding (first national policy memorandum on water management). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1982) Tweede nota Waterhuishouding (Second National Policy Memorandum on Water management). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1989) Derde nota Waterhuishouding (Third National Policy Memorandum on Water management). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1992) Omgaan met de Omgeving (Dealing with the surrounding area). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1995) Ruimte voor Rivieren (room for rivers). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1998a) Aanpak wateroverlast (Tackling flooding). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rijkswaterstaat (1998b) Vierde Nota Waterhuishouding (fourth national policy memorandum on water management). Ministry of Transport, Public Works and water management. The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemma’s in general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–159

    Google Scholar 

  • RIZA (1985) Omgaan met water (Dealing with water). The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Rotmans J (1994) Transitions on the move. Global dynamics and sustainable development. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J (2003) Transitiemanagement. Sleutel voor een duurzame Wereld. (Transition Management. The key for a sustainable society). Koninklijke Van Gorcum. Assen. The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt MBA (2000) Transitions and transition management, the case of an emission-free energy supply. International Centre for Integrative Studies, Maastricht, The Netherlands

  • Saeijs HLF (1991) Integrated water management. A new concept: from treating of symptoms towards a controlled ecosystem management in the Dutch delta. Lands Urban Plan 20:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Valk D, Wolsink M (2001) Water als Ordenende factor (Water as guiding principle). Rooilijn no. 6, pp 382–388

  • Verbong G (2000) The Dutch government and energy transitions: a historical perspective. Research document for the report Transitions& Transition management, the case for an emission free energy supply (Rotmans et al., 2000). TUE Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • VROM (2001) Vijfde nota over de Ruimtelijke Ordening (Fifth National Policy Memorandum on Spatial Planning). The Hague, The Netherlands

  • Wildlife Fund World (1992) Levende Rivieren (living rivers). Zeist, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following persons for their cooperation in the interviews done: Prof. Dr. H. L. F. Saeijs; Ir. W. van der Kleij (TAW, Technical Advisory Committee for Embankment.); Ir. G. Verwolf, (Regional Waterboard ‘ de Veluwe’); Dr. W. Overmars, (Consultancy Bureau Willem Overmars) Dr. L. de Jong, (World Wildlife Fund); Dr. H. Kamphuis (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment); Dr. J.W. Bruggenkamp (RIZA)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rutger van der Brugge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Brugge, R., Rotmans, J. & Loorbach, D. The transition in Dutch water management. Reg Environ Change 5, 164–176 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7

Keywords

Navigation