Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of ad hoc networks in supporting climate change adaptation: a case study from the Southeastern United States

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To examine the factors that support adaptation within a regional and sectoral context, this article explores five climate-sensitive sectors in North and South Carolina (Forestry, Government Administration, Tourism, Water Management, and Wildlife Management) and the role of partnerships, collaborations, and networks in facilitating climate adaptation and related activities. Drawing from 117 online questionnaires and interviews with sector leaders across the Carolinas, the article highlights several key functions of networks in regard to supporting adaptation—intra-sector information sharing; monitoring, data collection, and research; and education and outreach. Furthermore, the analysis examines how climate networks in the region have facilitated the development of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital while also noting factors that have constrained the growth and success of both intra- and cross-sector collaboration. Although no formal, or discrete, state or regional cross-sector climate change network exists in the Carolinas, climate adaptations and capacity-building efforts have been supported by ad hoc and decentralized networks, emerging collegial partnerships within and across sectors, and collaborative efforts to pool expertise and resources. The role of different forms of social capital within these networks is discussed in the context of a contentious political environment where support for activities designed to address climate change is limited. These findings enhance our understanding of the social factors and relational processes that shape and influence capacity to adapt to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79(4):387–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. Comptes Rendus Geosci 337(4):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. Working Paper, # W081-3. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Program; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  • Bierbaum R, Smith JB, Lee A, Blair M, Carter L, Chapin FS III, Fleming P, Ruffo S, Stults M, McNeeley S, Wasley E, Verduzco L (2013) A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 18:361–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd E, Osbahr H (2010) Responses to climate change: exploring organizational learning across internationally networked organizations for development. Environ Educ Res 16(5–6):629–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown H, Nkem J, Sonwa D, Bele Y (2010) Institutional adaptive capacity and climate change response in the Congo Basin forests of Cameroon. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 15(3):263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC (2012) Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y

  • C2ES (2012) Climate change adaptation: what federal agencies are doing. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2008) Adaptive capacity and traps. Ecol Soc 13(2):40

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE (2012) Views of the frontiers in climate change adaptation economics. WIREs Clim Change 3(2):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Resour 31:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle N (2011) Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Glob Environ Change 21:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Emqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 3:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford J, Smit B (2004) A framework for assessing the vulnerability of communities in the Canadian Arctic to risks associated with climate change. Arctic 57(4):119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerth LS (2009) Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight 11(4):14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environ Politics 17(3):349–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juhola S, Westeroff L (2011) Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: a case study of network governance in two European countries. Environ Sci Policy 14(3):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettle NP (2012) Exposing compounding uncertainties in sea level rise assessments. J Coastal Res 28(1):161–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad CE, Fuhrmann CM (2012) Climate of the Southeast United States: past, present, and future. In: Ingram KT, Dow K, Carter L (eds) Southeast region technical report to the national climate assessment, U.S. National Climate Assessment, p 334. http://downloads.usgcrp.gov/NCA/Activities/NCA_SE_Technical_Report_FINAL_7-23-12.pdf

  • Lackstrom K, Dow K, Haywood B, Brennan A, Kettle N, Brosius A (2012) Engaging climate-sensitive sectors in the Carolinas. Technical Report: CISA-2012-03. Carolinas integrated sciences and assessments, Columbia

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming 2001–2010. Soc Q 52:155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody J, Paxton P (2009) Continuing to build bridges: more on linking social capital and social networks. Am Behav Sci 52(12):1611–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser S (2007) In the long shadows of inaction: the quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Glob Environ Politics 7(2):124–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Yohe G, Agyeman J (2008) Adaptation to climate change in the Northeast United States: opportunities, processes, constraints. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 13:643–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napton DE, Auch RF, Headley R, Taylor JL (2010) Land changes and their driving forces in the Southeastern United States. Reg Environ Change 10:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2010) Informing an effective response to climate change. National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C (2001) Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2012) Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Econ Theory 49:353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19(3):354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Howden M, Crimp S (2012) Informing regional level policy development and actions for increased adaptive capacity in rural livelihoods. Environ Sci Policy 15(1):23–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, High C (2005) Understanding adaptation: what can social capital offer assessments of adaptive capacity? Glob Environ Change 15:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change governance. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):496–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sales RFMJ (2009) Ulnerability and adaptation of coastal communities to climate variability and sea-level rise: their implications for integrated coastal management in cavite city Philippines. Ocean Coast Manag 52(7):395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw P (1997) Intervening in the shadow systems of organizations: consulting from a complexity perspective. J Organ Change Manag 10(3):235–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Burton I, Klein R, Street R (1999) The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 4:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szreter S, Woolcock M (2004) Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol 33(4):650–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby R, Vaughan K (2011) Hallmarks of organizations that are adapting to climate change. Water Environ J 25:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, Abrahamson V, Raine R (2010) Social capital, individual responses to heat waves and climate change adaptation: an empirical study of two UK cities. Glob Environ Change 20:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock M, Narayan D (2000) Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs 15(2):225–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R, Faris C (2011) Climate change mitigation and adaptation in North American cities. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was part of a larger research project (Lackstrom et al. 2012) funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office (NA060AR4310007) and conducted by the Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments (CISA), one of 11 US RISA programs, to serve as a technical input for the 2013 National Climate Assessment. The authors wish to thank the decision makers who participated in the study for their time and insights as well as the invaluable support provided by research team members Amanda Brennan, Ashley Brosius, Sam Ferguson, Dylan Foster, Chris Rappold, Daniel Tompkins, Erin Weeks, and Henrik Westerkam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin K. Haywood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dow, K., Haywood, B.K., Kettle, N.P. et al. The role of ad hoc networks in supporting climate change adaptation: a case study from the Southeastern United States. Reg Environ Change 13, 1235–1244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0440-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0440-8

Keywords

Navigation