Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The effects of climate and changing land use on the discharge regime of a small catchment in Tanzania

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing pressure on water resources makes it necessary to understand the reasons for the changes in the run-off characteristic of the Ngerengere River in Tanzania during recent years. Changing land use and changes in climate boundaries are identified as effects. A combination of statistical analysis and the use of the hydrological model SWAT were chosen to handle the problem of poor data quantity and quality with non-overlapping periods. Changes in the discharge regime were identified with the 5th percentile of the flow duration curve as an indicator for high-flow events, with an indicator for low-flow duration and with the base flow index. The analysis showed that climate boundaries and changing land use do not have a uniform effect on discharge in the catchment. Changing land use affects surface run-off and increases floods in the mountainous areas. Changes in climate boundaries increase the duration of low flow and no flow in the Ngerengere catchment. Changes in climate conditions and land use had antipodal effects on parts of the discharge regime. Thus, the observed changes in land use and climate conditions partially compensate for each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JG, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling. Hydrol Process 19(3):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM, Muttiah R, Bernhardt G (1995) Automated base–flow separation and recession analysis techniques. Ground Water 33(6):1010–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment—part 1: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batjes NH (2004) SOTER–based soil parameter estimates for Southern Africa. ISRIC—World Soil Information 2004/04, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronaugh D, Werner A (2009) ‘Zyp’ package—Zhang + Yue–Pilon trends package. http://www.r-project.org

  • Bruijnzeel LA (1990) Hydrology of moist tropical forests and effects of conversion: a state of knowledge review. UNESCO. IHP humid tropics programme series 2. Paris

  • Calder IR (2002) Forests and hydrological services: reconciling public and science perceptions. Land Use Water Resour Res 2(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1994) Map of annual rainfall. FAO. http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=3829&currTab=simple

  • FAO (2004) Map of reference evapotranspiration. FAO. http://www.fao.org/climatechange/54638/en/

  • Githui FW (2008) Assessing the impacts of environmental change on the hydrology of the Nzoia catchment, in the Lake Victoria Basin Department of Hydrology and Hydraulic. Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Brussels, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomani MC, Dietrich O, Lischeid G, Mahoo H, Mahay F, Mbilinyi B, Sarmett J (2010) Establishment of a hydrological monitoring network in a tropical African catchment: an integrated participatory approach. Phys Chem Earth 35(13–14):648–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross J (2009) ‘Nortest’ package—tests for normality. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nortest/index.html

  • Holländer HM, Blume T, Bormann H, Buytaert W, Chirico GB, Exbrayat JF, Gustafsson D, Hölzel H, Kraft P, Stamm C, Stoll S, Blöschl G, Flühler H (2009) Comparative predictions of discharge from an artificial catchment (Chicken Creek) using sparse data. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(11):2069–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E (2006) Hole–filled seamless SRTM data V3. International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Colombia, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashaigili J (2008) Impacts of land–use and land–cover changes on flow regimes of the Usangu wetland and the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 33(8–13):640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod AI (2011) ‘Kendall’ package—Kendall rank correlation and Mann–Kendall trend test. http://www.stats.uwo.ca/faculty/aim

  • Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans Asabe 50(3):885–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MPEE (2007) Morogoro region—socio–economic profile. Ministry of Planning, Economy and Empowerment, Dar Es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mtalo F, Mulungu D, Mwanuzi F, Mkhandi S, Kimaro T, Valimba P (2005) Hydrological analysis for the Eastern ArcMountain forests. Conservation and Management of the Eastern Arc Mountain Forests—Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Dar er Salam

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulungu DMM, Munishi SE (2007) Simiyu River catchment parameterization using SWAT model. Phys Chem Earth 32(15–18):1032–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwakalila S (2005) Water resource use in the Great Ruaha Basin of Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 30(11–16):903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwakalila S (2011) Vulnerability of people’s livelihoods to water resources availability in semi arid areas of Tanzania. J Water Resour Prot 3:678–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwamila TB, Kimwaga RJ, Mtalo FW (2008) Eco–hydrology of the Pangani River downstream of Nyumba ya Mungu reservoir, Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 33(8–13):695–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natkhin M, Steidl J, Dietrich O, Dannowski R, Lischeid G (2012) Differentiating between climate effects and forest growth dynamics effects on decreasing groundwater recharge in a lowland region in Northeast Germany. J Hydrol 448–449:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndomba PM, Mtalo FW, Killingtveit A (2005) The suitability of SWAT model in sediment yield modeling for ungauged catchments: a case of Simiyu River subcatchment, Tanzania. In: 3rd International SWAT Conference 61–69, Zürich

  • Ndomba P, Mtalo F, Killingtveit A (2008) SWAT model application in a data scarce tropical complex catchment in Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 33(8–13):626–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Srinivasan R, Williams JR (2009) Soil and water assessment tool—input/output file documentation Grassland, Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 365, Texas A&M University, Texas

  • Nyenzi BS, Kiangi PMR, Rao NNP (1981) Evaporation values in East-Africa. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioclimatol Ser B Theor Appl Climatol 29(1–2):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palamuleni GL, Ndomba PM, Annegarn HJ (2011) Evaluating land cover change and its impact on hydrological regime in Upper Shire river catchment, Malawi. Reg Environ Change 11(4):845–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2006) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarmett J, Anderson E, Mandari A (2008) Wami River Sub–Basin, Tanzania—initial environmental flow assessment. Wami–Ruvu Basin Water Office, Tanzania

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1379–1389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3–4):147–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Jones PG, Owiyo T et al (2006) Mapping climate vulnerability and poverty in Africa. Report to the Department for International Development. Department for International Development, ILRI, Nairobi

  • Valimba P (2008) Temporal flow variations: a challenge for water management in Tanzania. In: GLOBAL CHANGES and WATER RESOURCES: confronting the expanding and diversifying pressures. IWRA, Montpellier, France. http://www.iwra.org/congress/2008

  • Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1994) Flow–duration curves. I: new interpretation and confidence intervals. J Water Resour Plan Manag 120((4):485–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanda PZ, Munishi PKT (2007) Hydrologic and land use/cover change analysis for the Ruvu River (Uluguru) and Sigi River (East Usambara) Watersheds. Dar es Salaam. Eastern Arc Mountains Conservation Endowment Fund (EAMCEF), Morogoro, Tanzania. http://easternarc.or.tz/downloads/Uluguru/Final%20Report%20Revised_20_04_2007.pdf

  • Yapo PO, Gupta HV, Sorooshian S (1996) Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall–runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. J Hydrol 181(1–4):23–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, Cavadias G (2002) The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrol Process 16(9):1807–1829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zambrano–Bigiarini M (2011) ‘hydroTSM’ package—time series management, analysis and interpolation for hydrological modelling. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hydroTSM/

  • Zhao G, Hörmann G, Fohrer N, Zhang Z, Zhai J (2010) Streamflow trends and climate variability impacts in Poyang Lake Basin, China. Water Resour Manag 24:689–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work reported here was undertaken as part of the project ”Resilient Agro-landscapes to Climate Change in Tanzania (ReACCT)” funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) under a Research Program: “Adaptation of African Agriculture to Climate Change”. The authors would like to thank the WRBWO, TMA, Sokoine University of Agriculture and University of Dar es Salam for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Müncheberg, Germany

    Marco Natkhin, Ottfried Dietrich, Meike Pendo Schäfer & Gunnar Lischeid

  2. Thünen-Institute for Forest Ecosystems, Eberswalde, Germany

    Marco Natkhin

Authors
  1. Marco Natkhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ottfried Dietrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Meike Pendo Schäfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gunnar Lischeid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Natkhin.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Calibrated parameters in the SWAT model (Neitsch et al. 2009)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Natkhin, M., Dietrich, O., Schäfer, M.P. et al. The effects of climate and changing land use on the discharge regime of a small catchment in Tanzania. Reg Environ Change 15, 1269–1280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0462-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0462-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation