Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Policy diffusion in arid Basin water management: a Q method approach in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Murray–Darling Basin is Australia’s national food bowl, home to almost half of the national income from food production, as well as internationally significant wetlands, iconic red gum forests, endangered flora and fauna, and approximately 40 autonomous indigenous nations. Persistent severe drought and extreme flooding episodes have presented new challenges in the region. Chief among these challenges is the establishment of a legitimate framework to sustainably manage water resources that finds common ground between environmental, indigenous and commercial interests. A powerful approach to examine these processes is through the theory of diffusion and adaptation of policy innovations. Here, we describe an approach to place this theory on empirical ground using Q methodology. We elucidate patterns of subjectivity, to explore the perceptions of expert advice, subsidiarity and local knowledge to better understand the interests in play. We find that respect is held for local practitioners (water managers and farmers) and indigenous knowledge, but while policy innovations are being generated, the diffusion of policy is contested. We identify the potential, though limited, for common ground through substantive and respectful consultation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABC (2007) Transcript from ABC AM National News Radio Program, 3rd Sept 2007, accessed online 17th Dec 2012 from http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2007/s2022053.htm

  • ABC (2012) Transcript from ABC “The world today” news radio program, broadcast on 26th Oct 2012, accessed online 20th Dec 2012 from http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2012/s3619160.htm

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernauer T, Böhmelt T, Buhaug H, Gleditsch NP, Tribaldos T (2012) Demand, supply, and restraint: determinants of domestic water conflict and cooperation, Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change: evidence for sustainable development. 5–6 Oct 2012, Berlin, Germany

  • Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner RD, Lynch AH (2010) Adaptive governance and climate change. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CECA (2011) Genocidalists impose water restrictions on food producers during flood, Media release accessed online 17th Dec 2012 http://cecaust.com.au/main.asp?sub=releases&id=2011_01_07_Block_Farmers.html

  • Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DA, Lee DS, Freeman MMR, Clark SG (2008) Polar bear conservation in Canada: denning the policy problems. Arctic 61:347–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui BS, Yang QC, Yang ZF, Zhang K (2009) Evaluating the ecological performance of wetland restoration in the Yellow River Delta, China. Ecol Eng 35:1090–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredriksson PG, Wollshcied JR (2011) Environmental decentralization and political centralization, environmental federalism: the political economy of the design of local taxation and environmental protection. 9–10 December 2011. Universita Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ, Pittock J, Davis R, Williams J, Fu G, Warburton M, Udall B, McKenzie R, Yu X, Che N, Connell D, Jiang Q, Kompas T, Lynch A, Norris R, Possingham H, Quiggin J (2012) Global insights into water resources, climate change and governance. Nat Clim Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1746

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson K, Niemeyer S (2011) Public responses to climate change: the role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Glob Environ Change 21:957–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan A (2010) A comparison of offline and online Q factors, International Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity (ISSSS) 26th Annual Q Conference, Akron, OH, USA

  • Humphries P (2007) Historical indigenous use of aquatic resources in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin, and its implications for river management. Ecol Manag Restor 8:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Jeppesen T (2000) EU Environmental policy: adapting to the principle of subsidiarity? European Environ 10:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl HA, Susskind LE, Wallace KH (2007) A dialogue, not a diatribe: effective integration of science and policy through joint fact finding. Environ Polit 49:20–34

    Google Scholar 

  • La Nauze J (2009a) Victoria’s new red gum national parks and the development of aboriginal co-management policy. Interaction 37:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • La Nauze J (2009b) Victorian red gum forests: an historic victory. Chain React 105:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell HD (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. Elsevier, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell H, Kaplan A (1950) Power and society. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • LMDCMA (2006) Lower murray darling catchment action plan. Lower Murray Darling Catchment Management Authority, Buronga

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob Environ Change 17:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AH, Brunner RD (2010) Learning from climate variability: adaptive governance and the Pacific ENSO applications center. Weather Clim Soc 2:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch A, Griggs D, Joachim L, Walker J (2012) The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray–Darling Basin. Policy Sciences Online first, Australia. doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9164-8

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin C, Krantzberg G (2012) An appraisal of management pathologies in the Great Lakes. Sci Total Environ 416:40–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MCMA (2007) Catchment action plan. Murray Catchment Management Authority, Deniliquin

    Google Scholar 

  • MDBA (2012) Basin Plan 2012. Accessed online on 20 Dec 2012 at http://download.mdba.gov.au/Basin-Plan/Basin-Plan-Nov2012.pdf, in: Murray–Darling Basin Authority (Ed.). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra

  • National Research Council (2007) Colorado River Basin water management: evaluating and adjusting to hydroclimatic variability. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer S, Petts J, Hobson K (2005) Rapid climate change and society: assessing responses and thresholds. Risk Anal 25:1443–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government (2003) Catchment management authorities Act 2003. NSW Government (Ed.), Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockwell D (2008) ‘Opening up’ policy to reflexive appraisal: a role for Q Methodology? A case study of fire management in Cape York, Australia. Policy Sci 41:263–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raadgever GT, Mostert E, van de Giesen NC (2008) Measuring perspectives on future flood management on the Rhine: application and discussion of Q methodology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 5:437–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber BH, Kaufman SE, Cropp F (2000) Assessing Q-assessor: a validation study of computer-based Q sorts versus paper sorts. Operant Subj 23:192–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Piñeros S, Focht W, Lewis D, Montgomery D (2012) Incorporating values into community-scale sustainable forest management plans: an application of Q methodology. Small-Scale Forestry 11:167–183. doi:10.1007/s11842-011-9182-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy ED, Martin JF, Irwin EG, Conroy JD, Culver DA (2011) Living within dynamic social-ecological freshwater systems: system parameters and the role of ecological engineering. Ecol Eng 37:1661–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran J, Brzoska M, Kominek J, Link PM, Schilling J (2012) Climate change and violent conflict. Science 336:869–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman H (2007) Decentralization and environmental quality: an international analysis of water pollution. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 13098

  • Sinn H-W (1994) How much Europe? Subsidiarity, centralization and fiscal competition. Scott J Polit Econ 41:85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson W (1935a) Correlating persons instead of tests. J Pers 4:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson W (1935b) Technique of factor analysis. Nature 136:297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebel F, Widmer T (2012) Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity. Policy Sci 45:385–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonn BE, Zambrano P, Moore S (2001) Community networks or networked communities? Soc Sci Comput Rev 19:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Exel J, de Graaf G (2005) Q methodology: a sneak preview. http://qmethod.org/articles/QmethodologyASneakPreviewReferenceUpdate.pdf

  • Vidot A, (2012) Murray–Darling Basin Plan signed into law at last—22 November 2012, ABC Rural. Accessed online on 20th Dec 2012 at http://www.abc.net.au/rural/news/content/201211/s3638832.htm

  • Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research: theory, method and interpretation. Sage Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger EC (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger EC, Snyder WM (2000) Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business School 78:139–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth KL, Baldwin DS, Kerr JL (2012) Drought, floods and water quality: drivers of a severe hypoxic blackwater event in a major river system (the southern Murray–Darling Basin, Australia). J Hydrol 450–451:190–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf J, Brown K, Conway D (2009) Ecological citizenship and climate change: perceptions and practice. Environ Polit 18:503–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work could not have been possible without the contributions from Lee Joachim, Jackie Walker, Kate Auty and Gordana Marin. In addition, the importance of the participation, support and interest of the Yorta Yorta Elders Council cannot be overestimated. We appreciate the technical mastery of Stephan Adler. This work has been supported by Brown University. Finally, the views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent those of The World Bank Group or its Board of Directors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda H. Lynch.

Additional information

Editor: Will Steffen.

This paper is dedicated to our good friend and colleague, the late Nick Howard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lynch, A.H., Adler, C.E. & Howard, N.C. Policy diffusion in arid Basin water management: a Q method approach in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. Reg Environ Change 14, 1601–1613 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0602-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0602-3

Keywords

Navigation