Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adaptation is situated within multiple, interacting social, political, and economic forces. Adaptation pathways envision adaptation as a continual pathway of change and response embedded within this broader sociopolitical context. Pathways emphasize that current decisions are both informed by past actions and shape the landscape of future options. This research examines how adaptation actors in Grand County, Colorado perceive adaptation in the context of environmental change and uncertainty. Grand County residents drew on experiences of past change to suggest they had a high capacity to respond to future change, in particular a significant outbreak of mountain pine beetle. While residents and land managers characterized adaptation as gradual and incremental, they also recognized the ways that powerful cross-scale processes related to federal land management and water diversions challenged local adaptation. Further, Grand County residents identified multiple uncertainties in addition to those associated with climate projections, suggesting that addressing uncertainty extends beyond developing strategies robust across different climate scenarios. The challenges of uncertainty and cross-scale governance require more than increased adaptive capacity; they demand that we understand how local and extra-local structures shape the adaptation envelope that enables and constrains local decisions and implementation. Within this envelope, local actors pursue particular adaptation pathways and exercise agency to influence the structures shaping their options. Drawing on empirical insights, we argue that the concepts of pathways and envelopes together provide theoretical space for understanding the dynamic interplay between structure and agency in the context of adaptation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337(4):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Change 15(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009) Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Clim Change 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archie KM (2013) Mountain communities and climate change adaptation: barriers to planning and hurdles to implementation in the Southern Rocky Mountain Region of North America. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change Online First. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9449-z

  • Bammer G, Smithson M (eds) (2008) Uncertainty and risk: multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett TJ, Fogelman C (2013) Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum 48:42–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Hurk B, Bessembinder J, Boer J, Bregman B, Drunen M (2013) Framing climate uncertainty: socio-economic and climate scenarios in vulnerability and adaptation assessments. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0519-2

  • Buuren A, Driessen P, Teisman G, Rijswick M (2013) Toward legitimate governance strategies for climate adaptation in the Netherlands: combining insights from a legal, planning, and network perspective. Reg Environ Change. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0448-0

  • Camacho AE (2009) Adapting governance to climate change: managing uncertainty through a learning infrastructure. Emory Law J 59:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin SF, Zavaleta ES, Welling LA, Deprey P, Yung L (2007) Planning in the context of uncertainty: flexibility for adapting to change. In: Cole DN, Yung L (eds) Beyond naturalness: rethinking park and wilderness stewardship in an era of rapid change. Island Press, Washington, pp 216–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Clow DW (2010) Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: a response to recent warming. J Clim 23(9):2293–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2011) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489

  • Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke RA (2009) Do we need better predictions to adapt to a changing climate? Ecos 90(13):111–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrowski SZ, Abatzoglou J, Swanson AK, Mynsberge A, Greenberg JA, Holden Z, Schwartz MK (2013) The climate velocity of the contiguous United States during the 20th century. Glob Change Biol 19(1):241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovers SR, Hezri AA (2010) Institutions and policy processes: the means to the ends of adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 1:212–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow K, Haywood BK, Kettle NP, Lackstrom K (2013) The role of ad hoc networks in supporting climate change adaptation: a case study from the Southeastern United States. Reg Environ Change 13(6):1235–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing TE (2012) Views of the frontiers in climate change adaptation economics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 3(2):161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck I, Kearns RA (2006) Structuration theory: agency, structure, and everyday life. In: Aitken S, Valetine G (eds) Approaches to human geography. Sage, London, pp 86–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ebi Kristie et al (2014) A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Clim Change 122:363–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer M, Mische A (1998) What is agency? Am J Sociol 103(4):962–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius C, Folke C, Cundill G, Schultz L (2007) Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: a synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecol Soc, 12(1):29. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/

  • Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Policy 7(1):46–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

  • Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 32(2):217–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge, p 417

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidley J, Fien J, Smith J-A, Thomsen D, Smith T (2009) Participatory future methods: towards adaptability and resilience in climate-vulnerable communities. Environ Policy Gov 19:427–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodier C, Austin S, Soetanto R, Dainty A (2010) Causal mapping and scenario building with multiple organizations. Futures 42:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haasnoot M, Middelkoop H, Offermans A, van Beek E, van Deursen WP (2012) Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Clim Chang 115(3–4):795–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Jones L, Boyd E (2011) Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Glob Environ Chang 21:1262–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan D, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14(2):147–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE (2008) Coping with deep uncertainty: challenges for environmental assessment and decision-making. In: Bammer G, Smithson M (eds) Uncertainty and risk: multidisciplinary perspectives. Earthscan, London, pp 337–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles N, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2006) Trends in snowfall versus rainfall in the Western United States. J Clim 19(18):4545–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layder D (1998) Sociological practice: linking theory and social research. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McWethy DB, Gray ST, Higuera PE, Littell JS, Pederson GT, Ray AJ, Whitlock C (2010) Climate and terrestrial ecosystem change in the US. Rocky Mountains and Upper Columbia Basin: historical and future perspectives for natural resource management. Natural Resource Report NPS/GRYN/NRR—2010/260. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Measham TG, Preston BL, Smith TF, Brooke C, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Morrison C (2011) Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: barriers and challenges. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 16:889–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles M, Huberman A (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. PNAS 107(51):22026–22031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Colorado Council of Government (NWCCG) (2006) Transitions in mountain communities: resort economies and their secondary effects. Venturoni Surveys and Research Inc, Dillion

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard LP, Schjolden ANE (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7(1):73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K (2012) Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog Hum Geogr 36(5):667–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Hochachka G (2010) Integral adaptation to climate change. J Int Theor Pract 5(1):89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozkaynak B, Rodriguez-Labajos B (2010) Multi-scale interaction in local scenario-building: a methodological framework. Futures 42:995–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2011) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray AJ, Barsugli JJ, Averyt KB (2008) Climate change in Colorado: a synthesis to support water resources management and adaptation. A report for the Colorado water conservation board by the NOAA-CU Western water assessment

  • Schoennagel T, Veblen TT, Negron JF, Smith JM (2012) Effects of mountain pine beetle on fuels and expected fire behavior in Lodgepole Pine Forests, Colorado, USA. PLoS One 7(1):e30002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N, Leiserowitz A (2012) The rise of global warming skepticism: exploring affective image associations in the United States over time. Risk Anal 32(6):1021–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford Smith M, Horrocks L, Harvey A, Hamilton C (2011) Rethinking adaptation for a 4 °C world. Philos Trans A 369(1934):196–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarlock D (1994) The nonequilibrium paradigm of ecology and the partial unraveling of environmental law. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev 27:1121–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetra Tech, HabiTech Inc., Walsh Aquatics, Inc. (2010) Draft report stream management plan phase 3 Grand County, Colorado. Prepared for Grand Country CO, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton TF, Manasfi N (2010) Adaptation—genuine and spurious: demystifying adaptation processes in relation to climate change. Environ Soc: Adv Res 1(1):132–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins EL, Few R, Brown K (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change. J Environ Manage 88(4):1580–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald RT, Stouffer RJ, Dixon KW (2001) Committed warming and its implications for climate change. Geophys Res Lett 28(8):1535–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JE, Haak AL, Neville HM, Colyer WT (2009) Potential consequences of climate change to persistence of cutthroat trout populations. N Am J Fish Manage 29(3):533–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise R, Fazey I, Stafford Smith M, Park SE, Eakin HC, Archer van Garderen ERM, Campbell B (2014) Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Glob Environ Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002

  • Wyborn C, Bixler PR (2013) Collaboration and nested environmental governance: scale dependency, scale framing and cross-scale interactions in collaborative conservation. J Environ Manage 123:58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Tol RSJ (2002) Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 12(1):25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung L, Patterson ME, Freimund WA (2010) Rural community views on the role of local and extra-local interests in public lands governance. Soc Nat Resour 23(12):1170–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Grand County residents who participated in interviews and focus groups. We are grateful to the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station for financial support and for the contributions of Cory Cleveland, Solomon Dobrowski, Lisa Eby, Shannon McNeeley, and Erin Towler.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Room 304, Main Hall, Missoula, MT, USA

    Carina Wyborn & Laurie Yung

  2. Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Daniel Murphy

  3. Rocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA

    Daniel R. Williams

Authors
  1. Carina Wyborn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laurie Yung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel R. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Wyborn.

Additional information

Editor: James D. Ford.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wyborn, C., Yung, L., Murphy, D. et al. Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Change 15, 669–682 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0663-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0663-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation