Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation

  • Review
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem service research is high on the policy agenda. Strategies to synthesize individual success stories and derive generalized results to provide guidance for policymakers and stakeholder is central to many science-policy initiatives, such as Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. However, generalization requires the documentation of basic information on methods and results of case studies, which might not be present throughout all case studies. We used a quantitative review based on a random sample of studies published in the ISI Web of Knowledge between 1996 and 2016 to identify blind spots in ecosystem service research that might hinder the generalization. We structured our analysis along critical questions about five facets that characterize the holistic ideal of ecosystem services research: (i) social-ecological validity of ecosystem data and models, (ii) consideration of trade-offs between ecosystem services, (iii) recognition of off-site effects, (iv) comprehensive and shrewd involv ement of stakeholders, and (v) relevance and usability of study results for the operationalization of the ecosystem service concept in practice. Results show that these facets were not addressed by the majority of case studies including more recent studies. Clusters of ecosystem services studied together were prone to different blind spots. To effectively operationalize the concept of ecosystem services, the blind spots need to be addressed by upcoming studies. A list of critical questions is provided to raise the awareness of the blind spots both for synthesis of existing knowledge and for future research agendas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The database is available under https://figshare.com/s/16b8a3bdf43cdcd26e2f, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4930010.

Notes

  1. https://www.cbd.int/

  2. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/2020.htm

  3. http://www.teebweb.org/

  4. http://www.eld-initiative.org/

  5. http://www.ipbes.net/

  6. https://www.wavespartnership.org/en

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the manuscript.

Funding

The work has been funded by the EU-FP7 project OPERAs under grant agreement number FP7-ENV-2012-308393.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Lautenbach.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

Temporal trends in the five critical facets of ecosystem service research (PDF 337 kb)

ESM 2

Spatial pattern of ecosystem service research facets (PDF 52010 kb)

ESM 3

References of the papers in the sample (PDF 728 kb)

ESM 4

The ecosystem service categories used in the manuscript. (PDF 635 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lautenbach, S., Mupepele, AC., Dormann, C.F. et al. Blind spots in ecosystem services research and challenges for implementation. Reg Environ Change 19, 2151–2172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1457-9

Keywords

Navigation