Abstract
Assessing the marginal abatement costs (MACs) of emissions improves the understanding of the extent of current CO2 mitigation and provides regions and industries with information on how to mitigate emissions cost-effectively. This study proposes a hybrid method to evaluate the MAC. It combines the strengths of bottom-up engineering methods and top-down economy-wide methods. A parametric directional distance function is employed to estimate the MAC from an economic perspective, and the abatement level is further incorporated to generate increasing curves, similar to the outcomes derived from an engineering perspective. In addition, this method takes into consideration whether the abatement level exceeds the abatement potential with current production technologies so as to provide a more realistic estimation of the MAC curves. The proposed technique is applied in estimating the carbon emission MAC in China’s petroleum industry. The estimation results indicate that (i) the MAC of China’s petroleum industry would change from 9821 to 16,307 yuan/ton when the abatement level increases from 1 to 50%; (ii) this industry would spend 36.5 to 42.5 billion Chinese yuan annually to achieve China’s CO2 reduction target proposed in its Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs); (iii) assigning the CO2 reduction targets based on the estimated MAC curves instead of the traditional grandfathering abatement target assignment would help to save China’s petroleum industry an additional 29.97 to 33.65% in abatement costs when achieving the NDCs. The MAC curves estimated in this study indicate more accurate relationships between abatement levels and abatement costs, and hence provide decision-makers in industries and governments with a more reliable instrument to determine the prices of emissions permits, total abatement costs, and implementation strategies in an emissions trading scheme.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aigner DJ, Chu SF (1968) On estimating the industry production function. Am Econ Rev 58(4):826–839. https://doi.org/10.2307/1815535
Aiken DV, Pasurka CA Jr (2003) Adjusting the measurement of US manufacturing productivity for air pollution emissions control. Resour Energy Econ 25(4):329–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(03)00042-3
Beltrán-Esteve M, Gómez-Limón JA, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martínez E (2014) A metafrontier directional distance function approach to assessing eco-efficiency. J Prod Anal 41(1):69–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-012-0334-7
Boyd G, Molburg J, Princ R (1996) Alternative methods of marginal abatement cost estimation: non-parametric distance functions. Selected paper from The 17th Annual North American Conference of the International Association for Energy Economics, Boston, MA. Retrieved online https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/449842. Accessed 18 Jan 2019
CEADs (2017). China emission accounts & datasets. Retrieved online http://www.ceads.net/. Accessed 12 Oct 2018
Chen CC (2015) Assessing the pollutant abatement cost of greenhouse gas emission regulation: a case study of Taiwan’s freeway bus service industry. Environ Resour Econ 61(4):477–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9803-y
Chen C, Delmas MA (2012) Measuring eco-inefficiency: a new frontier approach. Oper Res 60(5):1064–1079. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1120.1094
Coggins JS, Swinton JR (1996) The price of pollution: a dual approach to valuing SO2 allowances. J Environ Econ Manage 30(1):58–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1996.0005
de Souza JFT, de Oliveira BP, Ferrer JTV, Pacca SA (2018) Industrial low carbon futures: a regional marginal abatement cost curve for Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Clean Prod 200:680–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.206
Du L, Hanley A, Wei C (2015) Marginal abatement costs of carbon dioxide emissions in China: a parametric analysis. Environ Resour Econ 61(2):191–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-014-9789-5
Enkvist P, Nauclér T, Rosander J (2007) A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. The McKinsey Quarterly, pp 34-45. Retrieved online http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/scpi/cgwg/McKinsey.pdf. Accessed 6 Jan 2019
Färe R, Vardanyan MF (2010) On functional form representation of multi-output production technologies. J Prod Anal 33(2):81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0164-4
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CK, Yaisawarng S (1993) Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. Rev Econ Statistics:374–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109448
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Weber WL (2006) Shadow prices and pollution costs in US agriculture. Ecol Econ 56(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.022
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Hayes KJ, Margaritis D (2008) Estimating demand with distance functions: parameterization in the primal and dual. J Econ 147(2):266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.09.033
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka CA Jr, Weber WL (2012) Substitutability among undesirable outputs. Appl Econ 44(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.498368
Gnansounou E, Dong J, Bedniaguine D (2004) The strategic technology options for mitigating CO2 emissions in power sector: assessment of Shanghai electricity-generating system. Ecol Econ 50(1–2):117–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.03.028
Hailu A, Veeman TS (2000) Environmentally sensitive productivity analysis of the Canadian pulp and paper industry, 1959-1994: an input distance function approach. J Environ Econ Manage 40(3):251–274. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.2000.1124
Hasanbeigi A, Morrow W, Sathaye J, Masanet E, Xu T (2013) A bottom-up model to estimate the energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Energy 50:315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.062
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2018) Special report on Global warming of 1.5°C. Retrieved online https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
Kiuila O, Rutherford TF (2013) The cost of reducing CO2 emissions: integrating abatement technologies into economic modeling. Ecol Econ 87:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.006
Klepper G, Peterson S (2004) Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices. Resour Energy Econ 28(1):1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.04.001
Kwon OS, Yun WC (1999) Estimation of the marginal abatement costs of airborne pollutants in Korea’s power generation sector. Energy Econ 21(6):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00021-3
Lee M (2005) The shadow price of substitutable sulfur in the US electric power plant: a distance function approach. J Environ Manag 77(2):104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.02.013
Lee SC, Oh DH, Lee JD (2014) A new approach to measuring shadow price: reconciling engineering and economic perspectives. Energy Econ 46:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.019
Ma C, Hailu A, You C (2019) A critical review of distance function based economic research on China’s marginal abatement cost of carbon dioxide emissions. Energy Econ 84:104533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104533
Mao X, Zeng A, Hu T, Zhou J, Xing Y, Liu S (2013) Co-control of local air pollutants and CO2 in the Chinese iron and steel industry. Environ Sci Technol 47(21):12002–12010. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4021316
Mekaroonreung M, Johnson AL (2012) Estimating the shadow prices of SO2 and NOx for US coal power plants: a convex nonparametric least squares approach. Energy Econ 34(3):723–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.01.002
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2015) Enhanced actions on climate change: China’s intended nationally determined contributions, Beijing. Retrieved online http:// www.sdpc.gov.cn/xwzx/xwfb/201506/t20150630_710204.html. (in Chinese). Accessed 2 Nov 2018
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) (2016) China’s policies and actions for addressing climate change, Beijing. Retrieved online http://qhs.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfg/201611/t20161102_825491.html. (in Chinese). Accessed 2 Nov 2018
Peng J, Yu BY, Liao H, Wei YM (2018) Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emissions in the thermal power sector: a regional empirical analysis from China. J Clean Prod 171:163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.242
Rezek JON, Blair BF (2005) Abatement cost heterogeneity in phase I electric utilities. Contemp Econ Policy 23(3):324–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byi025
Rødseth KL (2013) Capturing the least costly way of reducing pollution: a shadow price approach. Ecol Econ 92:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.006
Swinton JR (1998) At what cost do we reduce pollution? Shadow prices of SO2 emissions. Energy J 19(4):63–83. https://doi.org/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol19-No4-3
Swinton JR (2004) Phase I completed: an empirical assessment of the 1990 CAAA. Environ Resour Econ 27(3):227–246. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EARE.0000017662.36573.2c
Timilsina GR, Sikharulidze A, Karapoghosyan E, Shatvoryan S (2017) Development of marginal abatement cost curves for the building sector in Armenia and Georgia. Energy Policy 108:29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.041
Tomaschek J (2015) Marginal abatement cost curves for policy recommendation–a method for energy system analysis. Energy Policy 85:376–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.05.021
Turner JA (1995) Measuring the cost of pollution abatement in the US electric utility industry: a production frontier approach. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Vardanyan M, Noh DW (2006) Approximating pollution abatement costs via alternative specifications of a multi-output production technology: a case of the us electric utility industry. J Environ Manag 80(2):177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.09.005
Wang K, Che L, Ma C, Wei YM (2017) The shadow price of CO2 emissions in China’s iron and steel industry. Sci Total Environ 598:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.089
Wang K, Yang K, Wei YM, Zhang C (2018a) Shadow prices of direct and overall carbon emissions in China’s construction industry: a parametric directional distance function-based sensitive estimation. Struct Change Econ D 47:180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.08.006
Wang K, Wei YM, Huang Z (2018b) Environmental efficiency and abatement efficiency measurements of China’s thermal power industry: a data envelopment analysis based materials balance approach. Eur J Oper Res 269(1):35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.04.053
Wang K, Wang J, Hubacek K, Mi Z, Wei YM (2019) A cost-benefit analysis of the environmental taxation policy in China: a frontier analysis-based environmentally extended input-output optimization method. J Ind Ecol 24(3):564–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12947
Wang Q, Lu M, Bai Z, Wang K (2020) Coronavirus pandemic reduced China’s CO2 emissions in short-term, while stimulus packages may lead to emissions growth in medium- and long-term. Appl Energy 278:115735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115735
Wu J, Ma C (2018) The convergence of China’s marginal abatement cost of CO2: an emission-weighted continuous state space approach. Environ Resour Econ 72:1099–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-0240-1
Wu Q, Zhang H, Zhang R, Li C (2020) An empirical study on the shadow price of carbon dioxide emissions in China’s industry. J Environ Stud 29(2):1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/109247
Xie B, Duan N, Wang Y (2017) Environmental efficiency and abatement cost of China’s industrial sectors based on a three-stage data envelopment analysis. J Cleaner Prod 153:626–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.100
Xu J, Hyde WF, Ji Y (2010) Effective pollution control policy for China. J Prod Anal 33(1):47–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0153-7
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71871022, 71828401, 71521002), the Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education, the Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (Grant No. 161076), the National Key R&D Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0602603), and the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Mitigation and adaptation strategies under uncertainties in East Asia
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 239 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, K., Xian, Y., Yang, K. et al. The marginal abatement cost curve and optimized abatement trajectory of CO2 emissions from China’s petroleum industry. Reg Environ Change 20, 131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01709-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01709-3