nach oben

Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management

Erschienen in:

19.03.2020 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Temporal variation of physico-chemical, microbiological, and parasitological properties of poultry manure from two egg production systems

verfasst von: Pedro Federico Rizzo, Patricia Alina Bres, Brian Jonathan Young, Marta Susana Zubillaga, Nicolás Iván Riera, María Eugenia Beily, Andrea Argüello, Diana Cristina Crespo, Antoni Sánchez, Dimitrios Komilis

Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management | Ausgabe 4/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Egg production has increased worldwide and, consequently, there is a large volume of poultry manure generated. The principal egg production systems are the caged ones, namely the conventional and the automated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the temporal variability of the physico-chemical, microbiological, and parasitological properties of poultry manure from both systems. Three conventional and four automated farms were studied. The main variables analyzed differed significantly between systems. Poultry manure from conventional system had the highest values of pH, total solids, C:N, phosphorous, sulfate, selected cations, and some microorganisms and parasites. Poultry manure from automated system had the highest values of electrical conductivity, volatile solids, nitrogen content, and soluble fraction of Ca, Mg, and Mn, among others. The lowest temporal variability of the measured parameters was observed in the automated system. Overall, all measured parameters, except nitrogen, had their highest values in the warmest season. The presence of pathogen microorganisms and parasites and the Na and Zn concentrations indicate that a special management before soil application should be considered. This study could contribute to the development of management strategies for poultry manure in each system, such as control of ambient conditions within the facilities and waste treatment.

Vorheriger Artikel Natural rubber composites with Grits waste from cellulose industry

Nächster Artikel Efficient enrichment of iron concentrate from iron tailings via suspension magnetization roasting and magnetic separation

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

FAO (2009) The state of food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome

Young BJ, Rizzo PF, Riera NI, Torre VD, López VA, Molina CD, Fernández FE, Crespo DC, Barrena R, Komilis D, Sánchez A (2016) Development of phytotoxicity indexes and their correlation with ecotoxicological, stability and physicochemical parameters during passive composting of poultry manure. Waste Manag 54:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.001 CrossRef

Hu Y, Cheng H, Tao S (2017) Environmental and human health challenges of industrial livestock and poultry farming in China and their mitigation. Environ Int 107:111–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.07.003 CrossRef

Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Burger M (2008) Layer hen manure analysis report. Australian Egg Corporation Limited, North Sydney

Bolan N, Adriano D, Mahimairaja S (2004) Distribution and bioavailability of trace elements in livestock and poultry manure by-products. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:291–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643380490434128 CrossRef

Maisonnave R, Lamelas K (2015) Buenas prácticas de manejo y utilización de cama de pollo y guano. Ministerio de Agroindustria, Buenos Aires

Quiroga G, Castrillón L, Fernández-Nava Y, Marañón E (2010) Physico-chemical analysis and calorific values of poultry manure. Waste Manag 30:880–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.12.016 CrossRef

Faissal A, Ouazzani N, Parrado J, Dary M, Manyani H, Morgado B, Barragan M, Mandi L (2017) Impact of fertilization by natural manure on the microbial quality of soil: molecular approach. Saudi J Biol Sci 24:1437–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.01.005 CrossRef

Kelleher B, Leahy J, HenihanO'dwyer AT, Sutton D, Leahy M (2002) Advances in poultry litter disposal technology—a review. Bioresour Technol 83:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00133-X CrossRef

10.

Rizzo PF, Torre VD, Riera NI, Crespo D, Barrena R, Sánchez A (2015) Co-composting of poultry manure with other agricultural wastes: process performance and compost horticultural use. J Mater Cycles Waste 17:42–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0221-y CrossRef

11.

Abouelenien F, Kitamura Y, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y (2009) Dry anaerobic ammonia–methane production from chicken manure. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:757–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1881-3 CrossRef

12.

Bres P, Beily ME, Young BJ, Gasulla J, Butti M, Crespo D, Candal R, Komilis D (2018) Performance of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of poultry manure with fruit and vegetable waste and analysis of digestate quality: a bench scale study. Waste Manag 82:276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.041 CrossRef

13.

IEC (2010) The egg industry 2010. A global view. https://www.internationalegg.com. Accessed 8 Aug 2019

14.

Naseem S, King AJ (2018) Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment—techniques for its reduction during poultry production. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:15269–15293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2018-y CrossRef

15.

Bloem E, Albihn A, Elving J, Hermann L, Lehmann L, Sarvi M, Schaaf T, Schick J, Turtola E, Ylivainio K (2017) Contamination of organic nutrient sources with potentially toxic elements, antibiotics and pathogen microorganisms in relation to P fertilizer potential and treatment options for the production of sustainable fertilizers: a review. Sci Total Environ 607:225–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.274 CrossRef

16.

Pelletier N (2017) Life cycle assessment of Canadian egg products, with differentiation by hen housing system type. J Clean Prod 152:167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.050 CrossRef

17.

USDA, USCC (2001) Test methods for the examination of composting and compost. Edaphos International, Houston

18.

ALPHA (1992) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater. ALPHA, Washington, DC

19.

Foreyt WJ (2013) Veterinary parasitology reference manual. Wiley, New York

20.

Ogunwande G, Osunade J, Ogunjimi L (2008) Effects of carbon to nitrogen ratio and turning frequency on composting of chicken litter in turned-windrow piles. Agric Eng Int CIGR J 10:1–16

21.

Tabatabaei M, Valijanian E, Aghbashlo M, Ghanavati H, Sulaiman A, Wakisaka M (2018) Prominent parameters in biogas production systems. Biogas. Springer, Basel, pp 135–161

22.

Burton CH, Turner C (2003) Manure management: treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture. Editions Quae, Bedford

23.

Zhou DM, Hao XZ, Wang YJ, Dong YH, Cang L (2005) Copper and Zn uptake by radish and pakchoi as affected by application of livestock and poultry manures. Chemosphere 59:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.008 CrossRef

24.

Borowski S, Weatherley L (2013) Co-digestion of solid poultry manure with municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 142:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.047 CrossRef

25.

Ihnat M, Fernandes L (1996) Trace elemental characterization of composted poultry manure. Bioresour Technol 57:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-8524(96)00061-2 CrossRef

26.

Zhou S, Han L, Huang G, Yang Z, Peng J (2018) Pyrolysis characteristics and gaseous product release properties of different livestock and poultry manures: comparative study regarding influence of inherent alkali metals. J Anal Appl Pyrol 134:343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.06.024 CrossRef

27.

Adekiya A, Agbede T, Aboyeji C, Dunsin O, Simeon V (2019) Effects of biochar and poultry manure on soil characteristics and the yield of radish. Sci Hortic 243:457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.048 CrossRef

28.

Lin XJ, Zhang R, Jiang S, Elmashad HM, Mitloehner F (2016) Nutrient flow and distribution in conventional cage, enriched colony, and aviary layer houses. Poult Sci 95:213–224. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev307 CrossRef

29.

Bernal MP, Sommer SG, Chadwick D, Qing C, Guoxue L, Michel FC Jr (2017) Current approaches and future trends in compost quality criteria for agronomic, environmental, and human health benefits. Adv Agron 144:143–233CrossRef

30.

Hruby CE, Soupir ML, Moorman TB, Pederson C, Kanwar R (2018) Salmonella and fecal indicator bacteria survival in soils amended with poultry manure. Water Air Soil Pollut 229:32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3667-z CrossRef

31.

Terzich M, Pope MJ, Cherry TE, Hollinger J (2000) Survey of pathogens in poultry litter in the United States. J Appl Poult Res 9:287–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/9.3.287 CrossRef

32.

Yeager JG, Ward R (1981) Effects of moisture content on long-term survival and regrowth of bacteria in wastewater sludge. Appl Environ Microbiol 41:1117–1122CrossRef

33.

Islam M, Doyle MP, Phatak SC, Millner P, Jiang X (2004) Persistence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in soil and on leaf lettuce and parsley grown in fields treated with contaminated manure composts or irrigation water. J Food Protect 67:1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1365 CrossRef

34.

Jenkins MB, Bowman DD, Ghiorse WC (1998) Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by ammonia. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:784–788CrossRef

35.

Strauch D (1991) Survival of pathogenic micro-organisms and parasites in excreta, manure and sewage sludge. Rev Sci Technol 10:813–846. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.10.3.565 CrossRef

36.

Mekuria S, Bayessa M (2017) Gastrointestinal helminths and their predisposing factors in different poultry management systems; Haromaya, Ethiopia. Ethiop Vet J 21:40–43. https://doi.org/10.4314/evj.v21i1.4 CrossRef

37.

Eigaard N, Schou TW, Permin A, Christensen JP, Ekstrøm CT, Ambrosini F, Cianci D, Bisgaard M (2006) Infection and excretion of Salmonella enteritidis in two different chicken lines with concurrent Ascaridia galli infection. Avian Pathol 35:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450601071696 CrossRef

38.

Hinrichsen LK, Labouriau R, Engberg RM, Knierim U, Sørensen JT (2016) Helminth infection is associated with hen mortality in Danish organic egg production. Vet Rec 179:196–199. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103614 CrossRef

39.

EU (2009) European Union Regulation No. 1069/2009. Animal by-products regulation. European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32009R1069. Accessed 9 Aug 2019

40.

WHO (2017) One health. https://www.who.int/features/qa/one-health/en/. Accessed 24 July 2019

41.

Abín R, Laca A, Laca A, Díaz M (2018) Environmental assessment of intensive egg production: a Spanish case study. J Clean Prod 179:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.067 CrossRef

42.

Liang Y, Xin H, Wheeler E, Gates R, Li H, Zajaczkowski J, Topper P, Casey KD, Behrends B, Burnham DJ (2005) Ammonia emissions from US laying hen houses in Iowa and Pennsylvania. Trans ASAE 48:1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20002 CrossRef

Titel: Temporal variation of physico-chemical, microbiological, and parasitological properties of poultry manure from two egg production systems
verfasst von: Pedro Federico Rizzo
Patricia Alina Bres
Brian Jonathan Young
Marta Susana Zubillaga
Nicolás Iván Riera
María Eugenia Beily
Andrea Argüello
Diana Cristina Crespo
Antoni Sánchez
Dimitrios Komilis
Publikationsdatum: 19.03.2020
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management / Ausgabe 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1438-4957
Elektronische ISSN: 1611-8227
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-020-01008-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2020

Separation and recovery of materials from the waste light emitting diode (LED) modules by solvent method

Heavy metal stabilization of industrial solid wastes using low-grade magnesia, Portland and magnesia cements

Key informants’ perspectives on the challenges of municipal solid waste management in Iran: a mixed method study

Application of micro-scale correlation analysis to estimate metal speciation and the matrix in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash

Identification of novel bacteria capable of accumulating 137Cs under K+ from anaerobic digested sludge for decontamination of 137Cs-contaminated biomass

Regeneration of titanate nanotubes by Aspergillus niger and Penicillium sp. under static conditions