Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do Chinese have similar health-state preferences? A comparison of mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about whether health-state preferences differ among Chinese populations. This study compared the preference values for EQ-5D-5L health states between mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese.

Methods

The preference values for ten EQ-5D-5L health states were elicited from general population samples of mainland Chinese and Singaporeans. In computer-assisted self-interviews, each participant completed five time trade-off (TTO) tasks to value five different EQ-5D-5L health states. The difference in TTO values between mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese was examined using random-effects linear regression and logistic regression models.

Results

A total of 194 eligible mainland Chinese and 145 eligible Singaporean Chinese provided data for this study. All ten health states considered, the mean TTO value was 0.18 for Singaporean Chinese and 0.35 for mainland Chinese, with the unadjusted and adjusted difference [95 % confidence interval (CI)] being −0.17 (−0.28, −0.07) and −0.16 (−0.27, −0.05). Singaporean Chinese had substantially lower TTO values than mainland Chinese for states with severe or extreme problems, with the adjusted difference being −0.30 (95 % CI −0.42, −0.17). On the other hand, Singaporean Chinese and mainland Chinese had similar TTO values for states with mild or moderate problems, with the adjusted (95 % CI) difference being 0.04 (−0.07, 0.15). Logistic regression analysis showed that Singaporean Chinese were more likely to rate health states with severe or extreme problems as worse than death compared to mainland Chinese.

Conclusions

Mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese have different preferences for EQ-5D-5L health states, supporting the development of local value sets for the EQ-5D-5L instrument for the two populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloom, B.S.: Use of formal benefit/cost evaluations in health system decision making. Am. J. Manag Care 10(5), 329–335 (2004)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gold, M.R., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B., Weinstein, M.C.: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dolan, P.: Whose preferences count? Med. Decis. Making 19, 482–486 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O’Brien, B.J., Stoddart, G.L.: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dolan, P.: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med. Care 35(11), 1095–1108 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feeny, D.H., Furlong, W.J., Torrance, G.W., Goldsmith, C.H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., Denton, M.: Multi-attribute and single attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med. Care 40(2), 113–128 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brazier, J.E., Roberts, J., Deverill, M.D.: The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J. Health Econ. 21(2), 271–292 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Torrance, G.W.: Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J. Health Econ. 5(1), 1–30 (1986)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Torrance, G.W., Thomas, W.H., Sackett, D.L.: A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv. Res. 7(2), 118–133 (1972)

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wisloff, T., Hagen, G., Hamidi, V., Movik, E., Klemp, M., Olsen, J.A.: Estimating QALY gains in applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010. Pharmacoeconomics 32(4), 367–375 (2014)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baida, X., Roset, M., Herdman, M., Kind, P.: A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med. Decis. Making 21(1), 7–16 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, N., Johnson, J.A., Shaw, J.W., Coons, S.J.: A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions. Med. Decis. Making 27(3), 321–326 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Q., Furlong, W., Feeny, D., Torrance, G.W., Barr, R.: How robust is the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 utility function? Med. Decis. Making 22(4), 350–358 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Norman, R., Cronin, P., Viney, R., King, M., Street, D., Ratcliffe, J.: International comparisons in valuing EQ-5D health states: a review and analysis. Value Health 12(8), 1194–1200 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsuchiya, A., Ikeda, S., Ikegami, N., Nishimura, S., Sakai, I., Fukuda, T., Hamashima, C., Hisashige, A., Tamura, M.: Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 11(4), 341–353 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, J.A., Luo, N., Shaw, J.W., Kind, P., Coons, S.J.: Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med. Care 43(3), 221–228 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dolan, P., Gudex, C., Kind, P., Williams, A.: Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J. Health Econ. 15(2), 209–231 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Department of Statistic Singapore. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications_and_papers/reference/sif2013.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2013

  19. Oppe, M., Devlin, N.J., van Hout, B., Krabbe, P.F.M., de Charro, F.: A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value Health 17(4), 445–453 (2014)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. EuroQol Group. EQ-5D-5L user guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. http://www.euroqol.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/Folders_Flyers/UserGuide_EQ-5D-5L.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2013

  21. Luo, N., Li, M., Stolk, E.A., Devlin, N.J.: The effects of lead time and visual aids in TTO valuations: a study of the EQ-VT framework. Eur. J. Health Econ. 14, S15–S24 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. BMJ Group Blogs. BMJ supportive and palliative care. http://blogs.bmj.com/spcare/2012/04/17/one-can-die-but-cannot-fall-ill-a-survey-on-how-costs-may-affect-choice-of-therapy-in-singapore/. Accessed 15 May 2013

  23. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2010. Health insurance systems in China: a briefing note. http://www.who.int/healthsystems/topics/financing/healthreport/37ChinaB_YFINAL.pdf (2010). Accessed 27 July 2013. Accessed 27 July 2013

  24. Augestad, L.A., Rand-Hendriksen, K., Stavem, K., Kristiansen, I.S.: Time trade-off and attitudes toward euthanasia: implications of using ‘death’ as an anchor in health state valuation. Qual. Life Res. 22(4), 705–714 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singapore Department of Statistics. Census of population 2010: statistical release 1 on demographic characteristics, education, language and religion. http://www.singstat.gov.sg/news/news/press12012011.pdf (2010). Accessed 27 July 2013

  26. BBC News. Survey finds 300 m China believers. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6337627.stm. Accessed 27 July 2013

  27. Wee, H.L., Li, S.C., Xie, F., Zhang, X.H., Luo, N., Cheung, Y.B., Machin, D., Fong, K.Y., Thumboo, J.: Are Asians comfortable with discussing death in health valuation studies? A study in multi-ethnic Singapore. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 4, 93 (2006)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, J.A., Ohinmaa, A., Murti, B., Sintonen, H., Coons, S.J.: Comparison of Finnish and U.S.-based visual analog scale valuations of the EQ-5D measure. Med. Decis. Making 20(3), 281–289 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Attema, A.E., Edelaar-Peeters, Y., Versteegh, M.M., Stolk, E.A.: Time trade-off: one methodology, different methods. Eur J Health Econ. 14(Suppl 1), S53–S64 (2013). doi:10.1007/s10198-013-0508-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Luo, N., Wang, P., Thumboo, J., Lim, Y.W., Vrijhoef, H.J.: Valuation of EQ-5D-3L health states in Singapore: modeling of time trade-off values for 80 empirically observed health states. Pharmacoeconomics 30(5), 495–507 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, G., Wu, H., Li, M., Gao, C., Luo, N.: Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Value Health (2014, in press)

  32. Devlin, N.J., Buckingham, K., Shah, K., Tsuchiya, A., Tilling, C., Wilkinson, G., van Hout, B.: A comparison of alternative variants of the lead and lag time TTO. Health Econ. 22(5), 517–532 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, 16 Medical Drive, Block MD3, Singapore, 117597, Singapore

    P. Wang & N. Luo

  2. Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA

    M. H. Li

  3. National School of Development, Peking University, Beijing, China

    G. G. Liu

  4. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    J. Thumboo

Authors
  1. P. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. H. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. G. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Thumboo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. N. Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Luo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Li, M.H., Liu, G.G. et al. Do Chinese have similar health-state preferences? A comparison of mainland Chinese and Singaporean Chinese. Eur J Health Econ 16, 857–863 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0635-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0635-z

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation