Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The generic and preference-based instrument EQ-5D is available in a five-response levels version (EQ-5D-5L). A value set for the EQ-5D-5L based on a representative sample of the German population has recently been developed. The aim of this study was to estimate normative values of the EQ-5D-5L index for Germany, and to examine associations between the EQ-5D-5L and selected sociodemographic factors.

Methods

The analysis was based on a representative sample (n = 4998) of the German general adult population in 2014. Participants had to rate their health-related quality of life on the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system as well as on a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS). Normative values of the EQ-5D-5L index were estimated for selected sociodemographic characteristics. For the examination of associations between EQ-5D-5L index scores and selected sociodemographic factors, multivariate regression analyses were used.

Results

The mean EQ-5D-5L index score of the total sample was 0.88 (SD 0.18), corresponding to an overall mean EQ-VAS score of 71.59 (SD 21.36). Female gender and increasing age were associated with a lower EQ-5D-5L index score (p < 0.001). Higher education, full-time employment and private health insurance were associated with a higher EQ-5D-5L index score (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This was the first study to estimate normative values of the EQ-5D-5L index for Germany based on a representative sample. The German normative values of the EQ-5D-5L are comparable to those reported for other countries. However, the mean EQ-5D-5L index score of the total sample was worse than those of the samples of studies from other countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission: Strengthening of the EU Cooperation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA). http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/roadmaps/docs/2016_sante_144_health_technology_assessments_en.pdf (2016). Accessed 12 Sep 2018

  2. Heintz, E., Gerber-Grote, A., Ghabri, S., Hamers, F.F., Rupel, V.P., Slabe-Erker, R., Davidson, T.: Is there a European view on health economic evaluations? Results from a synopsis of methodological guidelines used in the EUnetHTA partner countries. Pharmacoeconomics (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0328-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Torrance, G.W., O’Brien, B.J., Stoddard, G.L.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., Badia, X.: Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual. Life Res. (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Devlin, N.J., Shah, K.K., Feng, Y., Mulhern, B., van Hout, B.: Valuing health-related quality of life: an EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig, K., Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-M., Greiner, W.: German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. Pharmacoeconomics (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Watzke, B., Haller, E., Steinmann, M., Heddaeus, D., Härter, M., König, H.-H., Wegscheider, K., Rosemann, T.: Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy in primary care: study protocol of TIDe—telephone intervention for depression. BMC Psychiatry (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1429-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gensichen, J., Schultz, S., Adrion, C., Schmidt, K., Schauer, M., Lindemann, D., Unruh, N., Kosilek, R.P., Schneider, A., Scherer, M., Bergmann, A., Heintze, C., Joos, S., Briegel, J., Scherag, A., König, H.-H., Brettschneider, C., Schulze, T.G., Mansmann, U., Linde, K., Lühmann, D., Voigt, K., Gehrke-Beck, S., Koch, R., Zwissler, B., Schneider, G., Gerlach, H., Kluge, S., Koch, T., Walther, A., Atmann, O., Oltrogge, J., Sauer, M., Schnurr, J., Elbert, T.: Effect of a combined brief narrative exposure therapy with case management versus treatment as usual in primary care for patients with traumatic stress sequelae following intensive care medicine: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (PICTURE). Trials (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2853-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schultz, K., Seidl, H., Jelusic, D., Wagner, R., Wittmann, M., Faller, H., Nowak, D., Schuler, M.: Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with asthma: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (EPRA). BMC Pulm. Med. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-017-0389-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Golicki, D., Niewada, M.: EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Arch. Med. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.52126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garcia-Gordillo, M.A., Adsuar, J.C., Olivares, P.R.: Normative values of EQ-5D-5L: in a Spanish representative population sample from Spanish Health Survey, 2011. Qual. Life Res. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1164-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van den Berg, B.: SF-6D population norms. Health Econ. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinz, A., Kohlmann, T., Stöbel-Richter, Y., Zenger, M., Brähler, E.: The quality of life questionnaire EQ-5D-5L: psychometric properties and normative values for the general German population. Qual. Life Res. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0498-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huber, M.B., Felix, J., Vogelmann, M., Leidl, R.: Health-related quality of life of the general German population in 2015: results from the EQ-5D-5L. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040426

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McCaffrey, N., Kaambwa, B., Currow, D.C., Ratcliffe, J.: Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms. Health Qual. Life Outcomes (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Collado Mateo, D., García Gordillo, M.A., Olivares, P.R., Adsuar, J.C.: Normative values of EQ-5D-5L for diabetes patients from Spain. Nutr. Hosp. (2015). https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2015.32.4.9605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garcia-Gordillo, M.Á., Collado-Mateo, D., Olivares, P.R., Adsuar, J.C., Merellano-Navarro, E.: A cross-sectional assessment of health-related quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Iran. J. Public Health 46, 1046–1053 (2017)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Grupp, H., König, H.-H., Konnopka, A.: Health care utilisation and costs in the general population in Germany. Health Policy (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.11.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arbeitskreis Deutscher Markt- und Sozialforschungsinstitute e.V. (ADM): Die ADM Stichproben für Telefonbefragungen. ADM, Frankfurt am Main

  20. The EuroQol Group: EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ellert, U., Kurth, B.M.: Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität bei Erwachsenen in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1700-y

  22. Koch-Institut, Robert: Ergebnisse der Studie » Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell 2010«. Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. TNS Infratest Sozialforschung: SOEP 2013—Erhebungsinstrumente 2013 (Welle 30) des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels: Personenfragebogen, Altstichproben. SOEP Survey Papers 180: Series A. DIW/SOEP, Berlin (2014)

  24. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A.: Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. de Jong, P., Heller, G.Z.: Generalized Linear Models for Insurance Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Manning, W.G., Basu, A., Mullahy, J.: Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J. Health Econ. (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dickhaus, T.: Classes of multiple test procedures. In: Dickhaus, T. (ed.) Simultaneous Statistical Inference: With Applications in the Life Sciences, pp. 29–45. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Eurostat: Quality of Life. Facts and Reviews. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/6856423/KS-05-14-073-EN-N/742aee45-4085-4dac-9e2e-9ed7e9501f23 (2015). Accessed 18 Jan 2019

  30. McHorney, C.A., Tarlov, A.R.: Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual. Life Res. 4, 293–307 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Konnopka, A., König, H.-H.: The “no problems”-problem: an empirical analysis of ceiling effects on the EQ-5D 5L. Qual. Life Res. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1551-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. von der Lippe, E., Fehr, A., Lange, C.: Gesundheitsbedingte Einschränkungen bei alltäglichen Aktivitäten in Deutschland. J. Health Monit. (2017). https://doi.org/10.17886/RKI-GBE-2017-059

  33. König, H.-H., Bernert, S., Angermeyer, M.C.: Gesundheitszustand der deutschen Bevölkerung: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung mit dem EuroQol-Instrument. Gesundheitswesen (2005). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-857991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hinz, A., Klaiberg, A., Brähler, E., König, H.-H.: Der Lebensqualitatsfragebogen EQ-5D: Modelle und Normwerte fur die Allgemeinbevölkerung. Psychother. Psychosom. Med. Psychol. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-867061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Atzpodien, K., Bergmann, E., Bertz, J., Busch, M., Eis, D., Ellert, U., Fuchs, J., Gaber, E., Gutsche, J., Haberland, J., Hagen, C., Hapke, U.: Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. 20 Jahre nach dem Fall der Mauer: Wie hat sich die Gesundheit in Deutschland entwickelt? Robert Koch-Institut, Berlin (2009)

  36. Feng, Y., Devlin, N., Herdman, M.: Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare? Health Qual. Life Outcomes (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0356-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Maria Meyer for her support in visualization and data presentation as well as two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.

Funding

This study was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF; Grant number: 01EH1101B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Grochtdreis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 5.

Table 5 Frequencies of item responses in each EQ-5D-5L dimension by age category in percent (%; weighted sample)

Appendix 2

See Table 6.

Table 6 Mean EQ-5D-5L index scores by age categories by number of medical conditions (weighted sample)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grochtdreis, T., Dams, J., König, HH. et al. Health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-5D-5L: estimation of normative index values based on a representative German population sample and value set. Eur J Health Econ 20, 933–944 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01054-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation