Skip to main content
Log in

Characterizing the mechanical contribution of fiber angular distribution in connective tissue: comparison of two modeling approaches

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modeling of connective tissues often includes collagen fibers explicitly as one of the components. These fibers can be oriented in many directions; therefore, several studies have considered statistical distributions to describe the fiber arrangement. One approach to formulate a constitutive framework for distributed fibers is to express the mechanical parameters, such as strain energy and stresses, in terms of angular integrals. These integrals represent the addition of the contribution of infinitesimal fractions of fibers oriented in a given direction. This approach leads to accurate results; however, it requires lengthy calculations. Recently, the use of generalized structure tensors has been proposed to represent the angular distribution in the constitutive equations of the fibers. Although this formulation is much simpler and fewer calculations are required, such structure tensors can only be used when all the fibers are in tension and the angular distribution is small. However, the amount of error introduced in these cases of non-tensile fiber loading and large angular distributions have not been quantified. Therefore, the objective of this study is to determine the range of values of angular distribution for which acceptable differences (less than 10%) between these two formulations are obtained. It was found, analytically and numerically, that both formulations are equivalent for planar distributions under equal-biaxial stretch. The comparison also showed, for other loading conditions, that the differences decrease when the fiber distribution is very small. Differences of less than 10% were usually obtained when the fiber distribution was very low (κ ≈ 0.03; κ ranges between 0 and 1/3, for aligned and isotropic distributed fibers, respectively). This range of angular distribution greatly limits the types of tissue that can be accurately analyzed using generalized structure tensors. It is expected that the results from this study guide the selection of a proper approach to analyze a particular tissue under a particular loading condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ateshian G, Rajan V, Chahine NO, Canal CE, Hung CT (2009) Modeling the matrix of articular cartilage using a continuous fiber angular distribution predicts many observed phenomena. J Biomech Eng 131: 061003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billiar KL, Sacks MS (2000) Biaxial mechanical properties of the native and glutaraldehyde-treated aortic valve cusp: part II—a structural constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 122: 327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comninou M, Yannas IV (1976) Dependence of stress-strain nonlinearity of connective tissues on the geometry of collagen fibers. J Biomech 9: 427–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamant J, Keller A, Baer E, Litt M, Arridge RGC (1972) Collagen; ultrastructure and its relation to mechanical properties as a function of ageing. Proc R Soc Lond B 180: 293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federico S, Herzog W (2008) Towards an analytical model of soft biological tissues. J Biomech 41: 3309–3313

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Freed AD, Einstein DR, Vesely I (2005) Invariant formulation for dispersed transverse isotropy in aortic heart valves. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 4: 100–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia JJ (2007) Simulation of tensile high Poisson’s ratios of articular cartilage with a finite element fiber-reinforced hyperelastic model. Med Eng Phys 30: 590–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasser TC, Ogden RW, Holzapfel GA (2006) Hyperelastic modeling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3: 15–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girard MJA, Downs JC, Burgoyne CF, Francis-Suh JK (2009) Peripapilary and posterior scleral mechanics part I: development of an anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive model. J Biomech Eng 131: 051011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin HL, Elliott DM (2007) Quantifying the contributions of structure to annulus fibrosus mechanical function using a nonlinear, anisotropic, hyperelastic model. J Orthop Res 25: 508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2000) A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models. J Elast 61: 1–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel GA, Gasser TC, Ogden RW (2004) Comparison of a multilayer structural model for arterial walls with a Fung-type model, and issues of material stability. J Biomech Eng 126: 264–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlowec JA, Lake SP, Miller KS, Soslowsky LJ, Elliott DM (2009) A hyperelastic model with distributed fibers to describe the human supraspinatus tendon tensile mechanics. In: Summer Bioengineering Conference, Lake Tahoe, CA

  • Lanir Y (1978) Structure-strength relations in mammalian tendon. Biophys J 24: 541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y (1983) Constitutive equations for fibrous connective tissues. J Biomech 16: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanir Y, Lichtenstein O, Imanuel O (1996) Optimal design of biaxial tests for structural material characterization of flat tissues. J Biomech Eng 118: 41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limbert G, Middleton J (2004) A transversely isotropic viscohyperelastic material: Application to the modeling of biological soft connective tissues. Int J Solids Struct 41: 4237–4260

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen TD, Jones RE, Boyce BL (2008) A nonlinear anisotropic viscoelastic model for the tensile behavior of the corneal stroma. J Biomech Eng 130: 041020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandolfi A, Holzapfel GA (2008) Three-dimensional modeling and computational analysis of the human cornea considering distributed collagen fibril orientations. J Biomech Eng 130: 061006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks MS (2003) Incorporation of experimentally-derived fiber orientation into a structural constitutive model for planar collagenous tissues. J Biomech Eng 125: 187–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer AJM (1984) Continuum theory of the mechanics of fibre-reinforced composites. Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spilker RL, Donzelli PS, Mow VC (1992) A transversely isotropic biphasic finite element-model of the meniscus. J Biomech 25: 1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghupathy R, Barocas VH (2009) A closed-form structural model of planar fibrous tissue mechanics. J Biomech 42: 1424–1428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu HC, Yao RF (1976) Mechanical behavior of human annulus fibrosus. J Biomech 9: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin LA, Elliott DM (2005) A homogenization model for the annulus fibrosus. J Biomech 38: 1674–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn M. Elliott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cortes, D.H., Lake, S.P., Kadlowec, J.A. et al. Characterizing the mechanical contribution of fiber angular distribution in connective tissue: comparison of two modeling approaches. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9, 651–658 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0194-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-010-0194-x

Keywords

Navigation