Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Adaptive Segmentation of Vertebral Bodies from Sagittal MR Images Based on Local Spatial Information and Gaussian Weighted Chi-Square Distance

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a novel method for the automatic segmentation of the vertebral bodies from 2D sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images of the spine. First, a new affinity matrix is constructed by incorporating neighboring information, which local intensity is considered to depict the image and overcome the noise effectively. Second, the Gaussian kernel function is to weight chi-square distance based on the neighboring information, which the vital spatial structure of the image is introduced to improve the accuracy of the segmentation task. Third, an adaptive local scaling parameter is utilized to facilitate the image segmentation and avoid the optimal configuration of controlling parameter manually. The encouraging results on the spinal MR images demonstrate the advantage of the proposed method over other methods in terms of both efficiency and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gath I, Geva AB: Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transportation Pattern Analytical Machine Intelligence 11:773–781, 1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schillo C, Herrmann G, Ackermann F, et al: Statistical classification and segmentation of biomolecular surfaces. Proceedings International Conference Image Processing 3(3):560–563, 1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D: Snakes: Active contour models. International J Computer Vision 5:321–331, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G: Geodesic active contours. International J Computer Vision 22(1):61–79, 1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ronfard R: Region-based strategies for active contour models. International J Computer Vision 46:223–247, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paragios N, Deriche R: Geodesic active contours and level sets for detection and tracking of moving objects. IEEE Transaction Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 22:1–15, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan T, Vese L: Active contour without edges. IEEE Transaction Image Processing 10(2):266–277, 2001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH, Graham J: Active shape models—their training and application. Computer Vision Image Understanding (61) 38–59, 1995

  9. Mitchell SC, Bosch JG, Lelieveldt BP, et al: 3-d active appearance models: segmentation of cardiac MR and ultrasound images. IEEE Transport Medicine Imaging 21(9):1167–1178, 2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dunn JC: A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well separated cluster. J Cybernet 3(3):32–57, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bezdek JC: Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, 1981

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. J, Gray RM: Image Segmentation and Compression Using Hidden Markov Models (Monograph). Norwell: Kluwer Academic, 2000

  13. Greig DM, Porteous BT, Seheult AH: Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images. J Royal Statistical Society Series B 51:271–279, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Z, Leahy R: An optimal graph theoretic approach to data clustering: theory and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 15(11):1101–1113, 1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi J, Malik J: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence 22(8):888–905, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Angayarkanni P: MRI mammogram image segmentation using ncut method and genetic algorithm with partial filters. IJCSI International J Computer Science Issues 8(1):455–459, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gamio J, Belongie S, Majumdar S: Normalized cuts in 3D for spinal MRI segmentation. IEEE Transactions Medical Imaging 23(1):36–44, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malik J, Belongie S, Leung T, et al: Contour and texture analysis for image segmentation. International J Computer Vision 43(1):7–27, 2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng A, Jordan M, Weiss Y: On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm. Advances Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 849–856, 2001

  20. Cour T, Benezit F, Shi J: Spectral segmentation with multiscale graph decomposition. IEEE Conference Computer Vision Pattern Recognition 2(2):1124–1131, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zelnik ML, Perona P: Self-tuning spectral clustering. Advances Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 1601–1608, 2004

  22. Hagen L, Kahng A: New spectral methods for ratio cut partitioning and clustering. IEEE Transactions Computer-Aided Design 11(9):1074–1085, 1992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Perona P, Malik J: Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transportation Pattern Analytical Machine Intelligence 12:629–639, 1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perona P, Shiota T, Malik J: Anisotropic diffusion. Geometry-Driven Diffusion Computer Vision 1:73–92, 1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayer A, Greenspan H: An adaptive mean-shift framework for MRI brain segmentation. IEEE Transactions Image Processing 28(8):1238–1250, 2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sezgin M, Sankur B: Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electronic Imaging 13(1):146–165, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Alt H, Guibas LJ: Discrete geometric shapes: matching, interpolation, and approximation. In: Sack JR, Urrutia J Eds. Handbook of Computational Geometry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2000, pp 121–153

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the useful comments and suggestions of the editors and reviewers, which have improved this manuscript. This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (project no. 31000450, no. 81000613) and the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program, no. 2010CB732500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhentai Lu or Wufan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, Q., Lu, Z., Feng, Q. et al. Adaptive Segmentation of Vertebral Bodies from Sagittal MR Images Based on Local Spatial Information and Gaussian Weighted Chi-Square Distance. J Digit Imaging 26, 578–593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9552-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9552-9

Keywords

Navigation