Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Selection and Post-Entry Effects of Exports: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms

  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our paper adds empirical evidence on the causal effects of exporting on firms’ performances. Using a rich database on Italian manufacturing firms, we test the self-selection and the post-entry effects hypotheses with respect to various firms’ characteristics. Our analysis supports the idea that the superior performance of the exporters is due not only to a market selection mechanism, but also to efficiency improvements following the export activity. We find heterogeneous post-entry effects with respect to characteristics as geographical location, size and sector. To test the post-entry hypothesis we implement the propensity score matching and differences-in-differences techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ackerberg, D., K. Caves, and G. Frazier (2004). Structural Estimation of Production Functions. Working Paper, US Los Angeles.

  2. Alvarez, R., and R. López (2005). Exporting and Performance: Evidence from Chilean Plant. Canadian Journal of Economics 38 (4): 1384–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Angrist, J., and A. Krueger (1999). Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics. In O. Ashenfelter and D. Card (eds.), Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier .

  4. Aw, B., and A. Hwang (1995). Productivity and the Export Market: A Firm-Level Analysis. The World Bank Economic Review 14 (1): 1–65.

  5. Aw, B., S. Chung, and M. Roberts (1998). Productivity and the Decision to Export: Micro Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea. Working Paper 6558. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

  6. Bartelsman, E., and P. Dhrymes (1998). Productivity Dynamics: U.S. Manufacturing Plants 1972–1986. Productivity Analysis 9 (1): 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartelsman, E., and M. Doms (2000). Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Micro-Data. Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 569–594.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baily, M., E. Bartelsman, and J. Haltiwanger (1996). Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality. Small Business of Economics 8 (4): 259–278.

  9. Basile, R. (2001). Export Behavior of Italian Manufacturing Firms over the Nineties: The Role of Innovation. Research Policy 30 (8): 1185–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, S., and A. Ichino (2002). Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores. Stata Journal 2 (4): 358–377.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bellone, F., P. Musso, L. Nesta, and M. Quere (2008). The U-Shaped Productivity Dynamics of French Exporters. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 144 (4): 636–659.

  12. Bernard, A., and B. Jensen (1999). Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? Journal of International Economics 47 (1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard, A., and J. Wagner (1997). Exports and Success in German Manufacturing. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 133 (1): 134–157.

  14. Bernard, A., and J. Wagner (2001). Export Entry and Exit by German Firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 137 (1): 105–123.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bernard, A., J. Eaton, B. Jensen, and S. Kortum (2003). Plants and Productivity in International Trade. American Economic Review 93 (4): 1268–1290.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bottazzi, G., and M. Grazzi (2007). Wage Structure in Italian Manufacturing Firms. LEM Working Paper 2007-05. Scuola Speriore Sant’Anna, Pisa.

  17. Castellani, D. (2002). Export Behavior and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 138 (4): 605–628.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Clerides, S., S. Lach, and J. Tybout (1998). Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 903–948.

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Loecker, J. (2007). Do Exports Generate Higher Productivity? Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of International Economics 73 (1): 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dehejia, R., and S. Wahba (1999). Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Causal Studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 (448): 1053–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delgado, M. A., J. Farinas, and S. Ruano (2002). Firm Productivity and Export Markets: A Non-Parametric Approach. Journal of International Economics 57 (2): 397–422.

    Google Scholar 

  22. DeSouza, S. (2006). Levinsohn and Petrin’s (2003) Methodology Works under Monopolistic Competition. Economics Bulletin 12 (6): 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26 (3): 1126–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferragina, A., and B. Quintieri (2000). Caratteristiche delle imprese esportatrici italiane. Un’analisi su dati Mediocredito e Federmeccanica. ICE, Quaderni di Ricerca 14 (1): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger, and J. Krizan (1998). Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence. Working Paper 6803. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

  26. Girma, S., D. Greenaway, and R. Kneller (2004). Does Exporting Increase Productivity? A Microeconometric Analysis of Matched Firms. Review of International Economics 12 (5): 855–866.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Greenaway, D., and R. Kneller, R. (2005). Firm Heterogeneity, Exporting and Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey. Research Paper 2005/32. University of Nottingham.

  28. Heckman, J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator. Review of Economic Studies 65 (4): 261–294.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jacobson, L., R. LaLonde, and D. Sullinvan (1993). Earnings Losses of Displaced Workers. American Economic Review 8 (4): 685–709.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and Evolution of Industry. Econometrica 50 (3): 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Katayama, H., S. Lu, and J. Tybout (2003). Why Plant-Level Productivity Studies Are Often Misleading. An Alternative Approach to Interference. Working Paper 9617. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

  32. Klette, T., and Z. Griliches (1996). The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators When Output Prices Are Unobserved and Endogenous. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (4): 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin (2003). Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies 70 (2): 317–342.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lileeva, A., and D. Trefler (2007). Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity. Working Paper 13297. NBER, Cambridge.

  35. Marschak, J., and W. Andrews (1944). Random Simultaneous Equations and the Theory of Production. Econometrica 12 (12): 133–205.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Melitz, M. (2001). Estimating Firm-Level Productivity in Differentiated Product Industries. Mimeo. Harvard University.

  37. Melitz, M. (2003). The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity. Econometrica 71 (6): 1695–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nelson, R., and S. Winter (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  39. Olley, S., and A. Pakes (1996). The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry. Econometrica 64 (6): 1263–1297.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Roberts, M. J., and J. Tybout (1997). The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs. American Economic Review 87 (4): 545–564.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. Rubin (1983). The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sterlacchini, A. (2001). The Determinants of Export Performance: A Firm-Level Study in Italian Manufacturing. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv/Review of World Economics 137 (3): 450–472.

  43. Tybout, R. (2001). Plant and Firm Level Evidence on New Trade Theories. Working Paper 8418. NBER, Cambridge, Mass.

  44. Van Biesebroeck, J. (2006). Exporting Raises Productivity in Sub-Saharan African Manufacturing Plants. Journal of International Economics 67 (2): 373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wagner, J. (2005). Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm Level Data. Working Paper Series in Economics 4. Institute of Economics, University of Lueneburg.

  46. Wooldrige, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain

    Francesco Serti

  2. University of Urbino, Urbino, Italy

    Chiara Tomasi

  3. LEM, Scuola Superiore S.Anna, Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33, 56127, Pisa, Italy

    Francesco Serti & Chiara Tomasi

Authors
  1. Francesco Serti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiara Tomasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Tomasi.

Additional information

JEL no.

D24, F14, O31

About this article

Cite this article

Serti, F., Tomasi, C. Self-Selection and Post-Entry Effects of Exports: Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms. Rev World Econ 144, 660–694 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0165-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-008-0165-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation