Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ionospheric TEC estimation with the signals of various geostationary navigational satellites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
GPS Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of receiver equipment and GNSS and SBAS constellations, the coherent dual-frequency L-band transmissions are now available from a number of geostationary satellites. These signals can be used for ionospheric total electron content (TEC) estimation. The quality of these data, i.e., the level of noise in such TEC estimation is of great interest and importance. We present results of comparisons of noise patterns in TEC estimation using signals of geostationary satellites of augmentation systems such as the Indian GAGAN, the European EGNOS and the American WAAS, as well as the signals from the Chinese Beidou navigation system. We used data from two receiving sites in the European part of Russia and the USA, which are equipped with JAVAD Delta receivers. We found out that the noise level in TEC estimation based on geostationary satellites of the Beidou system is one order smaller than that for SBAS and corresponds to those of GPS/GLONASS at the same elevation angles. Typically, the TEC RMS was about 0.05 TECU for GPS/GLONASS satellites at elevation range 5–15°, 0.06 TECU for Beidou geostationary satellites at elevation range 15–25°, 0.6 TECU for GAGAN at elevation range 15–25°, 0.7 TECU for WAAS at elevation 45°, and 5 TECU for EGNOS at elevation 20°. We also discuss the capabilities of geostationary TEC observations in connection with the recent G4 geomagnetic storm of March 2015 using six IGS MGEX stations in the American, Southeast Asian and Australian sectors. We demonstrate the hemispheric asymmetry in the ionospheric TEC response during this storm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afraimovich EL, Palamartchouk KS, Perevalova NP (1998) GPS radio interferometry of travelling ionospheric disturbances. J Atmos Terr Phys 60(12):1205–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afraimovich EL, Astafyeva EI, Demyanov VV, Edemskiy IK, Gavrilyuk NS, Ishin AB, Kosogorov EA, Leonovich LA, Lesyuta OS, Palamartchouk KS, Perevalova NP, Polyakova AS, Smolkov GY, Voeykov SV, Yasyukevich YuV, Zhivetiev IV (2013) Review of GPS/GLONASS studies of the ionospheric response to natural and anthropogenic processes and phenomena. J Space Weather Space Clim 3:A27. doi:10.1051/swsc/2013049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astafyeva E, Zakharenkova I, Förster M (2015) Ionospheric response to the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day storm: a global multi-instrumental overview. J Geophys Res Space Phys. doi:10.1002/2015JA021629

    Google Scholar 

  • Bust GS, Mitchell CN (2008) History, current state, and future directions of ionospheric imaging. Rev Geophys 46:RG100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bust GS, Garner TW, Gaussiran TL II (2004) Ionospheric data assimilation three-dimensional (IDA3D): a global, multisensor, electron density specification algorithm. J Geophys Res Space Phys 109(A11):A11312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies K, Hartmann GK (1997) Studying the ionosphere with the global positioning system. Radio Sci 32(4):1695–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer SC, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geodesy 83(3–4):263–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (2001) Global positioning system: theory and practice, 5th edn. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jakowski N, Béniguel Y, De Franceschi G, Hernandez Pajares M, Jacobsen KS, Stanislawska I, Tomasik L, Warnant R, Wautelet G (2012) Monitoring, tracking and forecasting ionospheric perturbations using GNSS techniques. J Space Weather Space Clim 2:A22. doi:10.1051/swsc/2012022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin SG, Park JU (2007) GPS ionospheric tomography: a comparison with the IRI-2001 model over South Korea. Earth Planet Space 59(4):287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin R, Jin S, Tao X (2014) Ionospheric anomalies during the March 2013 geomagnetic storm from BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) Observations. In: China satellite navigation conference (CSNC), 2014 proceedings: volume I, lecture notes in electrical engineering vol 303, Springer, Berlin

  • Kunitsyn V, Tereshchenko E (2003) Ionospheric tomography. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kunitsyn VE, Nesterov IA, Padokhin AM, Tumanova YS (2011) Ionospheric radio tomography based on the GPS/GLONASS navigation systems. J Commun Technol Electron 56(11):1269–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunitsyn VE, Kurbatov GA, Yasyukevich YuV, Padokhin AM (2015) Investigation of SBAS L1/L5 signals and their application to the ionospheric TEC studies. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 12(3):547–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurbatov GA, Kunitsyn VE, Padokhin AM, Yasyukevich YuV (2015) TEC response to geomagnetic storms and solar flares as observed with SBAS L1/L5 signals. In: Progress in electromagnetics research symposium, 2004–2007

  • Mitchell CN, Spencer PS (2003) A three-dimensional time-dependent algorithm for ionospheric imaging using GPS. Ann Geophys 46(4):687–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Montenbruck O, Steigenberger P, Khachikyan R, Weber G, Langley RB, Mervart L, Hugentobler U (2014) IGS-MGEX: preparing the ground for multi-constellation GNSS science. Inside GNSS 9(1):42–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesterov IA, Kunitsyn VE (2011) GNSS radio tomography of the ionosphere: the problem with essentially incomplete data. Adv Space Res 47(10):1789–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prölss GW (1995) Ionospheric F-region storms. In: Volland H (ed) Handbook of atmospheric electrodynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S, Beutler G, Rothacher M (1998) Mapping and predicting the ionosphere. In: Proceedings of IGS AC workshop, Darmstadt, Germany, pp 307–320

  • Tsagouri I, Belehaki A, Moraitis G, Mavromichalaki H (2000) Positive and negative ionospheric disturbances at middle latitudes during geomagnetic storms. Geophys Res Lett 37(21):3579–3582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasyukevich YV, Mylnikova AA, Kunitsyn VE, Padokhin AM (2015) Influence of GPS/GLONASS differential code biases on the determination accuracy of the absolute total electron content in the ionosphere. Geomagnetism Aeron 55(6):763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to IGS MGEX and WDC Kyoto for the data and acknowledge the financial support of the Russian Scientific Foundation (Project 14-17-00637). Authors also acknowledge the valuable comments and help of Editor-in-Chief of GPS Solutions, Prof. Alfred Leick, and anonymous reviewer in improving present article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Padokhin.

Additional information

We dedicate this article to the blessed memory of our teacher, colleague and friend Prof. V. E. Kunitsyn, who passed away shortly before the completion of this work. The memory of him will always be in our hearts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kunitsyn, V.E., Padokhin, A.M., Kurbatov, G.A. et al. Ionospheric TEC estimation with the signals of various geostationary navigational satellites. GPS Solut 20, 877–884 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0500-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-015-0500-2

Keywords

Navigation