Abstract
Illuminating on the power transition theory, realists are more than convinced of potential structural conflicts in both economic and security realms due to China’s rise. They see China as a dormant source of challenges to American preeminence, economic policies of the west as evident in the recent negotiation discourses (e.g., G-20 and G-8 meetings), the “western” norms of diplomacy (e.g., Washington consensus) in developing countries including in Africa, and security concerns of its neighboring states. However, China will be able to avoid this claimed inevitability by abiding to peaceful ideas deeply embedded in “New Security Concept,” “peaceful rise theory,” “peaceful development” and a “harmonious world” doctrine. This paper argues that China will be able to rise peacefully because of the efficacy of practicing liberalism and constructivism at large in its diplomacy. China is increasingly and genuinely embracing shared norms and institutions, gradually gravitating East Asian regional order to its favor in the form of power constellation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
That a state becomes mindful of its military power as a resultant discourse of economic success is a well-known political axiom because of the incrementing needs to better secure and further advance its growing national interest based on expansion (Gilpin 1995). China is no exception, and it is actively pursuing modernization of military, one of the four Chinese modernization goals set at the beginning of reform policy adopted in 1978. Pundits are interested in Chinese military modernization program for their interest in not only learning the intent and purposes of Chinese military capability enhancement efforts but also the political consequences and ramifications. The interrelation of China’s economic development and military enhancement efforts had a peculiar pattern in the first 10 years (1978–1988) of the reform and open-door period. Reform initiatives in the military during this period largely focused on restructuring of Chinese military budget and personnel for the “cost factor” involved in realizing military professionalism and modernization (Wang 1995). In the name of military reforms and concentration on “economic development first,” significant cuts and reductions were made instead. Demobilization, for instance, was initially adopted with a goal to retire half of the total 4.3 million armed forces by 1986. It failed, however, with only 40% opting for retirement at the end of 1986 (Wang 1995). At one point, China’s defense budget in 1981 was “down to 5.4 billion yuan or almost 25% from the 1979 level” (Wang 1995). A further reduction was witnessed in 1985 when China’s military expenditure represented about 10.5% of total national expenditures, dropping from 14% in 1983. After 1989, military budget was soon recovered, ironically, with the end of the cold war. Military budget has, thereafter and to date, consistently recorded a double-digit growth. Moreover, reduced manpower was to be replaced by more sophisticated and advanced high-tech weaponry systems and weapons. Beijing claims that the intention and purpose of such an increase in military spending are to improve already-backward Chinese military welfare system. On the contrary, foreign pundits would disagree with their observation on Chinese military procurement program as it has been aggressive with purchasing weaponries conducive to the service of greater forward deployment strategies that are presumed to be beneficial to the protection of Chinese national interests. A great analytical work on the interrelation of Chinese economic development and military modernization efforts is available by Feigenbaum. In his work, he does an excellent job in relating China’s interests in securing overseas energy resources for sustainable economic reasons of China to the promotion of Chinese military modernization goal (Feigenbaum 1999). Hence, the concerns on the interrelation of China’s economic success and military modernization aspiration are shared by a growing cohort of China threat theorists.
Here, East Asia denotes ASEAN+3 states, namely ten Southeast Asian states and the three Northeast Asian states China, Japan, and South Korea.
References
Barnett M, Duvall R (2005) Power in international politics. Int Organ 59:39–75
Cheung CK G (2008) International relations theory in flux in view of China’s “Peaceful Rise”. Cph J Asian Stud 26:5–21
Cho YN, Chung JH (2008) China’s soft power: discussions, resources, and prospects. Asian Surv 48(3):453–472
Feigenbaum EA (1999) China’s military posture and the new economic geopolitics. Survival 41(2):71–88
Finkelstein D (1999) China’s new security concept: reading between the lines. Alexandria, VA, CAN Corp
Gill B, Huang Y (2006) Sources and limits of Chinese “soft power”. Survival 48(2):17–36
Gilpin R (1995) War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Glaser BS, Medeiros ES (2007) The changing ecology of foreign policy-making in China: the ascention and demise of the theory of “Peaceful Rise”. China Quart 190:291–310
Goldstein A (2007) Power transitions, institutions, and China’s rise in East Asia: theoretical expectations and evidence. J Strateg Stud 30(4–5):639–682
Goldstein J, Keohane RO (1993) Ideas and foreign policy: beliefs, institutions, and political change. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Harris S (2001) China and the pursuit of state interests in a globalising world. Pac Rev 13(1):15–29
Harris S (2005) China’s regional policies: how much hegemony? Aust J Int Aff 59(4):481–492
Higgot R (1994) Ideas, identity, and policy coordination in the Asia-Pacific. Pac Rev 7(4):367–379
Hsiung JC (1995) China’s omni-directional diplomacy: realignment to cope with monopolar U.S. Power. Asian Surv XXXV(6):573–586
Hua D (1997) China’s security dilemma to the year 2010. Stanford University, Center for International Security and Arms Control
Hughes CR (2005) Nationalism and multilateralism in Chinese foreign policy: the implications for Southeast Asia. Pac Rev 18(1):119–135
Johnston AI (2003) Is China a status quo power? Int Secur 27(4):5–56
Jones DM, Smith M (2007) Constructing communities: the curious case of East Asian regionalism. Rev Int Stud 33:165–186
Kang D (2003) Getting Asia wrong: the need for analytical framework. Int Secur 27(4):57–85
Kang D (2005) Why China’s rise will be peaceful: hierarchy and stability in the East Asian region. Perspec Polit 3(3):551–554
Kang S, Gung L (2007) Zhongguo heping fazhan guoji zhanlue yanjiu (Studies on international strategies for China’s peaceful development). Zhonggong zhongyang dangxiao chubanshe (Chinese Central Party School Press), Beijing
Legro JW (2005) Rethinking the world: great power strategies and international order. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Legro JW (2007) What China will want: the future intentions of a rising power. Perspect Polit 53:515–534
Mearsheimer JJ (2006) China’sChina’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105:160–162
Medeiros ES (2005-06) Strategic hedging and the future of Asia-Pacific stability. Wash Q 291:145–167
Ni JM, Chen ZX (2003) Zhongguo guoji zhanlue (China’s international strategy). People’s Publishing House, Beijing
Nye J (2004) Soft power: the means to success in world politics. Public Affairs, New York
Organski AFK (1958) World politics. New York, Alfred A. Knopf
Pedersen T (2002) Cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration. Rev Int Stud 8:677–696
Ross RS (2000) The 1995–96 Taiwan strait confrontation: coercion, credibility, and the use of force. Int Secur 25(2):87–123
Ross R, Zhu F (2008) China’s ascent: power, security, and the future of international politics. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Roy D (1994) Hegemon on the horizon? China’s threat to East Asian security. International Security 19(1):149–168
Roy D (2003) Tension in the Taiwan Strait. Survival 42(1):76–96
Shambaugh D (2004/05) China engages Asia: reshaping the regional order. Int Secur 29.3:64–99
Shih C (2005) Breeding a reluctant dragon: can China rise into partnership and away from antagonism? Rev Int Stud 31:755–774
Suettinger RL (2004) The rise and descent of “peaceful rise”. China Leadersh Monit 12:1–10
Tang S, Gries PH (2002) China’s security strategy: from offensive to defensive realism and beyond. EAI working paper No. 97. East Asian Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Waldron A (2005) The rise of China: military and political implications. Rev Int Stud 31:715–733
Walt SM (1998) International relations: one world, many theories. Foreign Policy 110:29–46
Wang JCF (1995) Contemporary Chinese politics: an introduction, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Wang Y (2007) Zhongguo bujueqi caishi zhenzhengde weixie (That China does not rise can really become a threat). Huanqiu Shibao (Global News), January 24, 2007
Whiting AS (1997) ASEAN eyes China: the security dimension. Asian Surv 37.4:299–322
Whiting AS (2001) China’s use of force, 1950–96, and Taiwan. Int Secur 26(2):103–131
Xu J (2007) Jiashi hexie shijie de lilun sikao (Theoretical thinking behind the development of harmonious world). In: Xu D (ed) Shijie Dashi yu hexie shijie (World trends and harmonious world). Zhishi chubanshe, Bejing, pp 44–54
Yu X (2005) Zai heping, fazhan, hezuo de qizhixia zhongguo zhanlue juyuqi de duiwai zhanlue conglun ( China’s foreign policy strategy in the era of strategic opportunity
Yu X (2007) ‘Hexie shijie’ yu zhongguo de heping fazhan daolu (‘Harmonious world and the road to China’s peaceful development. In: Xu D (ed) Shijie Dashi yu hexie shijie (World trends and harmonious world). Zhishi chubanshe, Bejing, pp 31–43
Zha D (2005) Comment: can China rise? Rev Int Stud 35:775–785
Zhao Q (2007) Managed great power relations: do we see “one-up and one-down”? J Strateg Stud 30(4–5):609–637
Zheng B (2005) China’s “peaceful rise” to the status of great power. Foreign Aff 84(5):18–24
Acknowledgment
The author is grateful to anonymous reviewers, and Brigid Gavin, Zheng Yongnian, Tang Shiping, Renato Cruz De Castro, Yong Nam Cho, and Jae Ho Chung for their helpful and constructive comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choo, J. Ideas matter: China’s peaceful rise. Asia Eur J 7, 389–404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-009-0241-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-009-0241-3