Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia: the EU and the combat against illegal logging

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asia Europe Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indonesia is an emerging power, but one problem particular taints the success story: corruption. While corruption affects all public policies, its disastrous effects are most visible in forestry. Indonesia is still home to the third largest rainforests in the world, but the country is losing its forests fast. One main driver of deforestation is illegal logging. The strengthening of the rule of law is therefore a key to stop or at least to slow down Indonesia’s deforestation rate. The European Union has been keen to support the Indonesian government in its fight against illegal logging in accordance with the European Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade Policy (FLEGT). In September 2013, Brussels and Jakarta have signed a FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement (a FELGT-VPA, more commonly known as “Timber Pact”). Under the Timber Pact, Jakarta promises an overhaul of its forest governance. This reform of forest governance is costly to the Indonesian government, in financial and political terms. After all, many actors profited from the old system. The question arises why the Indonesian government agreed to the Timber Pact. In the first part of the analysis, a rationalist perspective is taken to answer this question, focusing on the political and economical gains for the decision-makers. The second part looks at the issue from a constructivist angle and shows how the norm “fight illegal logging” fitted into the normative framework of Indonesian politics. By combining a rationalist and a constructivist perspective, a broad picture of successful EU norm diffusion is painted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interestingly, no Indonesian public opinion pollster—like Lembaga Survei Indonesia, Jaringan Suara Indonesia, IndoBarometer, or Lingkaran Survei Indonesia—has done so far a poll on environmental issues, which indicates in itself that the issue is not on the forefront of Indonesian politics.

References

  • Acharya A (2009) Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism. Cornell University Press, Itahaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Agung F, Obidzinski K, Tacconi L (2004) Learning lessons to promote forest certification and control illegal logging in Indonesia. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Antara News (2011) Legality verification system to protect RI timbers: Minister. 22 March. http://www.antaranews.com/en/news/69476/legality-verification-system-to-protect-ri-timbers-minister. Accessed 09 September 2013

  • Antara News (2012) Ekspor kayu V-legal ke Uni Eropa sukses. 14 December. http://www.antaranews.com/berita/348478/ekspor-kayu-v-legal-ke-uni-eropa-sukses. Accessed 09 September 2013

  • Aspinall E, Berger MT (2001) The break-up of Indonesia? Nationalisms after decolonization and the limits of the nation-state in post-cold war Southeast Asia. Third World Q 22(6):1003–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudner J (2012) The politics of ‘norm diffusion’ in Turkish European union accession negotiations: why it was rational for an Islamist party to be ‘pro-European’ and a secularist party to be ‘anti-European’. J Common Mark Stud 50(6):922–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedner A (2012) An elementary approach to the rule of law. Hague J Rule Law 2(1):48–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield MJ (2012) Is forest certification a hegemonic force? The FSC and its challengers. J Environ Dev 21(4):391–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T (2011) When Europe hits … beyond its borders: Europeanization and the near abroad. Comp Polit 9(4/5):394–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel T, Risse T (2012) From Europeanization to diffusion: introduction. West Eur Polit 35(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brack D (2012) Excluding illegal timber and improving forest governance: the European Union’s forest law enforcement, governance and trade initiative. In: Lujala P, Rustad SA (eds) High-value natural resources and post-conflict peacebuilding. Earthscan, London, pp 211–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks RE (2003) The new imperialism: violence, norms, and the “rule of law”. Mich Law Rev 101(7):2275–2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckrell J, Hoare A (2011) Controlling illegal logging: implementation of the EU timber regulation, (Chatham House Briefing Paper). http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/0611buckrell_hoare.pdf. Accessed 12 March 2013

  • Bullinger C, Haug M (2012) In and Out of the forest: decentralisation and recentralisation of forest governance in east Kalimantan, Indonesia. Austrian J South-East Asian Stud 5(2):243–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Capie D (2008) Localization as resistance: the contested diffusion of small arms norms in Southeast Asia. Secur Dialogue 39(6):637–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel JT (1997) International norms and domestic politics: bridging the rationalist-constructivist divide. Eur J Int Relat 3(4):473–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel JT (1999) Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. Int Stud Q 43:83–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel JT (2001) Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. Int Organ 55(3):553–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett RT, Primack RP (2008) Tropical rainforest conservation: a global perspective. In: Carson WP, Schnitzer SA (eds) Tropical forest community ecology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 442–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortell AP, Davis JW (1996) How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. Int Stud Q 40:451–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortell AP, Davis JW (2000) Understanding the domestic impact of international norms: a research agenda. Int Stud Rev 2(1):65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council/European Parliament (2010) Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32010R0995:EN:NOT. Accessed 12 March 2013

  • Davidson JS (2009) Dilemmas of democratic consolidation in Indonesia. Pac Rev 22(3):293–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Nevers R (2007) Imposing international norms: great powers and enforcement. Int Stud Rev 9:53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson DK (2000) Will Indonesia survive? Foreign Aff 53(3):95–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson DK, (2005) What is Indonesia? In: J. Bresnan, ed. 2005. Indonesia: the great transition. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham et al., pp 7–73

  • European Union, Republik of Indonesia (2011) FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement between Indonesia and the European Union: briefing note. http://www.euflegt.efi.int/files/attachments/euflegt/briefing_note_indonesia_en_.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2013

  • European Union, Republik of Indonesia (2013) Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Indonesia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union (FLEGT). http://ec.europa.eu/world/agreements/downloadFile.do?fullText=yes&treatyTransId=15601 Accessed 10 November 2013

  • Eurostat (2012) Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics: main results 2010–11. Publications Office of the EU, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • FERN (2013) Improving forest governance: a comparison of FLEGT VPAs and their impact, Brussels 2013. http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/VPAComparison_internet.pdf. Accessed 21 September 2013

  • Friend T (2003) Indonesian Destinies. Belknap Harvard, Cambridge (Ma.)/London

  • Global Timber (n.d.) Indonesia. http://www.globaltimber.org.uk/indonesia.htm. Accessed 07 February 2014

  • Gourevitch P (1978) The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. Int Organ 32(4):881–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gritten D, Kant P (2007) Assessing the impact of environmental campaigns against the activities of a pulp and paper company in Indonesia. Int For Rev 9(4):819–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvard Kennedy School (2010) From reformasi to institutional transformation: a strategic assessment of Indonesia’s prospects for growth, equity and democratic governance, Cambridge M.A. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN-DPADM/UNPAN042322.pdf. Accessed 21.03.2013

  • ITS Global (2011) The economic contribution of Indonesia’s forest-based industries, Melbourne 2011. http://www.itsglobal.net/sites/default/files/itsglobal/ITS_Indoforest_Economic_Report.pdf. Accessed 27.03.2013

  • Jakarta Globe (2012) Illegal logging in Kalimantan Cost state $35b in 2011. 24 March

  • Jakarta Globe (2013) Top Indonesian official throws weight behind keeping forest clearing ban. 21 January

  • Katyasungkana N (2000) Exchanging power or changing power? The problem of creating democratic institutions. In: Manning C, van Diermen P (eds) Indonesia in transition. Social aspects of reformasi and crisis. ISEAS, Singapore, pp 259–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar T (2010) The rule of law in Islamic thought and practice: a historical perspective. In: Heckman JJ, Nelson RL, Cabatigan L (eds) Global perspective on the rule of law. Routledge, New York, pp 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Leber J (2010) Indonesia walks a tricky path toward growth and sustainability. New York Times, 22 March 2010

  • Licht AN, Goldschmitt C, Schwartz SH (2007) Culture rules: the foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. J Comp Econ 35:659–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowy Institute (2012) Indonesia poll 2012: shattering stereotypes. http://lowyinstitute.org/files/lowy_indonesia_poll_2012.pdf. Accessed 05 February 2014

  • Luttrell C et al., (2011) Lessons from REDD+ from measure to control illegal logging in Indonesia, (CIFOR/UNODC Working Paper, No. 74), Bogor. http://www.unodc.org/documents/eastasiaandpacific//indonesia/publication/Lessons_for_REDD_from_measures_to_control_illegal_logging_in_Indonesia.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2013

  • Magen A (2009) Evaluating external influence on democratic development: transition. (Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law, Working Paper, no. 111), Stanford

  • Mulder N (1996) Inside Indonesian society: cultural change in java. Pepin Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyman M (2009) Civil society and the challenges of the post-Suharto era. In: Bünte M, Ufen A (eds) Democratization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Routledge, London, pp 251–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman N (2013) Indonesian legal timber gets a nor from European Union. Jakarta Post, 23 January

  • Pew Research Center (2009) Global warming seen as a major problem around the world less concern in the U.S., China and Russia, (Global Attitudes Project, December 2). http://www.pewglobal.org/2009/12/02/global-warming-seen-as-a-major-problem-around-the-world-less-concern-in-the-us-china-and-russia/. Accessed 24 February 2013

  • Poffenberger M, Hartanto H (2013) Communities under REDD+. Jakarta Post, 04 March

  • Prantl J, Nakano R (2011) Global norm diffusion in East Asia: how china and Japan implement the responsibility to protect. Int Relat 25(2):204–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramadhani M (2011) Uni Eropa Resmi Akui Sistem Legalitas Kayu Indonesia. Republika, 26 September. http://www.republika.co.id/berita/ekonomi/makro/11/09/26/ls4hlh-uni-eropa-resmi-akui-sistem-legalitas-kayu-indonesia. Accessed 20 September 2013

  • Risse-Kappen T (1995) Bringing transnational relations back in: introduction. In: Idem (ed) Bringing transnational relations back in: non-state actors, domestic structures and international institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig F, Sedelmeier U (2004) Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. J Eur Public Policy 11(4):669–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz M (2012)The European Union and Indonesia: problems and prospects for a global partnership. (Briefing Paper, European Institute for Asian Studies), Brussels April 2012. http://www.eias.org/documents/EIAS_Briefing_Paper_April_2012_Manuel_Schmitz.pdf Accessed 02 February 2014

  • Schütte SA (2012) Against the odds: anti-corruption reform in Indonesia. Public Adm Dev 32:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneca Greek (2004) Illegal logging and wood markets: the competitive impacts on the U.S. wood products industry, November 2004

  • Sihombing SO, Pongtuluran FD (2011) Understanding Indonesian values: a preliminary research to identify Indonesian culture (paper presented at the International Conference Political Economy of Trade Liberalization in Developing East Asia: Sustainability, Governance, and the Role of Small Business, 24.-25. Malang, Indonesia, November 2011)

  • Sukma R (2011) Indonesia finds a new voice. J Democr 22(4):110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talentino A (2012) Transgressive norms and the labels of liberal peacebuilding. Int J Peace Stud 17(1):47–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempo (2007) Illegal Logging dan pencucian uang, 4 December 2007. http://www.tempo.co/read/news/2007/12/04/055112877/Illegal-Logging-dan-Pencucian-Uang. Accessed 01 September 2013

  • The Economist (2011) Protecting Indonesia’s forests. 05 May 2011

  • Timber Trade Federation (n.d.) Andy Roby Interview. http://www.ttf.co.uk/Article/Detail.aspx?ArticleUid=18eff89f-025f-4e99-a356-2b4edbf01742. Accessed 02.04.2013

  • Transparency International (2013) Corruption Perception Index 2013. http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2013/. Accessed 10 February 2014

  • Van Heeswijk L,Turnhout E, (2012) The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.10.009. Accessed 20 September 2013

  • Widiaryanto P (2012) REDD: Reducing decentralization. Jakarta Post, 28 November

  • Wiersum, KF, Elands BHM (2012) Opinions on legality principles considered in the FLEGT/VPA policy in Ghana and Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, (2012). doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.08.004. Accessed 20 February 2013

  • Wihardja, MM (2010) Deforestation enriches a few while millions pay the price. Jakarta Globe, 28 October

  • Wollenberg E et al (2006) Between state and society: local governance of forest in Malinau, Indonesia. Forest Policy Econ 8:421–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Governance Indicators Project (2013) World Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. Accessed 01 February 2014

  • Yudhoyono SB (2011) The future of Indonesian forests. Jakarta Globe, 28 September

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KU Leuven, Master of European Studies, Leuven, Belgium

    Manuel Schmitz

Authors
  1. Manuel Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Schmitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmitz, M. Strengthening the rule of law in Indonesia: the EU and the combat against illegal logging. Asia Eur J 14, 79–93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0436-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0436-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation