Abstract
The complexities of ecological systems are often portrayed visually through the use of networks, and a number of techniques have been developed to quantify network properties in useful ways. Cavity-nesting communities may be particularly well suited for network analysis because these communities are hierarchically structured and interconnected. In addition, the mechanisms of cavity excavation and use, which mediate interactions between cavity-nesting species, are relatively clear and experimentally testable through cavity manipulation. Webs have recently been used as a visual tool to depict the structure of cavity-nesting communities. Here, we present a conceptual paper that explores future directions of nest web analysis. We provide a simple demonstration of how web visualization of cavity-nesting communities can enable the prediction of how community structure will shift when components are removed and identify non-intuitive indirect interactions within an ecological community. We also provide a brief review of some network tools used to examine ecological complexity. We hope this exercise can stimulate discussion of how nest web analysis can be advanced, for example by developing quantitative methods to describe and compare webs across different forest systems and by integrating population dynamics into nest webs to examine community-level stability. Such expansions of nest web analysis can contribute to the development of predictive capabilities for community response to environmental change and forest management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken K, Martin K (2007) The importance of excavators in hole nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada. J Ornithol (Epub ahead of print) doi:10.1007/s10336-007-0166-9
Bai M-L (2005) Tree cavity abundance and nest site selection of cavity nesting birds in a natural boreal forest of West Khentey, Mongolia. Ph.D. thesis. Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen. Göttingen
Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM (2006) Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431–433
Bednarz JC, Ripper D, Radley PM (2004) Emerging concepts and research directions in the study of cavity-nesting birds: keystone ecological processes. Condor 106:1–4
Belson MS (1998) Red-headed woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus) use of habitat at Wekiwa Springs State Park, Florida. MSc thesis, University of Central Florida, Orlando
Blanc LA, Walters JR (2007a) Cavity nest-webs of the longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) ecosystem. In: Blanc L (eds) Experimental study of an avian cavity-nesting community: nest webs, nesting ecology, and interspecific interactions. PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, pp 32–77
Blanc LA, Walters JR (2007b) Cavity excavation and enlargement as mechanisms for indirect interactions in an avian community. Ecology (in press)
Brosse S, Giraudel JL, Lek S (2001) Utilisation of non-supervised neural networks and principal component analysis to study fish assemblages. Ecol Model 146:159–166
Carter III JH, Walters JR, Everhart SH, Doerr PD (1989) Restrictors for red-cockaded woodpecker cavities. Wildlife Soc B 17:68–72
Chon T, Park YS, Moon KH, Cha EY (1996) Patternizing communities by using an artificial neural network. Ecol Model 90:69–78
Colasanti RL (1991) Discussions of the possible use of neural network algorithms in ecological modelling. Binary Comput Microbiol 3:13–15
Drever MC, Martin K (2007) Spending time in the forest: responses of cavity-nesters to changes in forest health in interior British Columbia. In: Otter K (eds) The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 236–251
Drossel B, McKane AJ (2003) Modelling Food Webs. In: Bornholdt S, Schuster HG (eds) Handbook of graphs and networks: from the genome to the Internet. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 218–247
Eadie J, Sherman P, Semel B (1998) Conspecific brood parasitism, population dynamics and the conservation of cavity-nesting birds. In: Caro T (ed) Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 306–340
Hinton GE, Shallice T (1991) Lesioning an attractor network: investigation of acquired dyslexia. Psychol Rev 98:74–95
Ives AR, Klug JL, Gross K (2000) Stability and species richness in complex communities. Ecol Lett 3:399–411
Lek S, Guégan JF (1999) Artificial neural networks as a tool in ecological modeling, as introduction. Ecol Model 120:65–73
Lewinsohn TM, Prado PI (2006) Structure in plant-animal interaction assemblages. Oikos 113:174–184
Libralato S, Christensen V, Pauly D (2006) A method for identifying keystone species in food web models. Ecol Model 195:153–171
Lohr SM, Gauthreaux SA, Kilgo JC (2002) Importance of coarse woody debris to avian communities in loblolly pine forests. Conserv Biol 16:767–777
Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17
Martin K, Eadie JM (1999) Nest webs: a community-wide approach to management and conservation of cavity-nesting forest birds. For Ecol Manag 115:243–257
Martin K, Norris AR (2007) Life in the small-bodied cavity-nester guild: demography of sympatric mountain and black-capped chickadees within nest web communities under changing habitat conditions. In: Otter K (eds) The ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: an integrated approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–399
Martin K, Aitken KEH, Wiebe KL (2004) Nest sites and nest webs for cavity-nesting communities in interior British Columbia, Canada: nest characteristics and niche partitioning. Condor 106:5–19
May RM (2006) Network structure and the biology of populations. Trends Ecol Evol 21:394–399
McDonald DB (2007) Predicting fate from early connectivity in a social network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10910–10914
Memmott J, Alonso D, Berlow EL, Dobson A, Dunne JA, Sole R, Weitz J (2006) Biodiversity loss and ecological network structure. In: Pascual M, Dunne JA (eds) Ecological networks: linking structure and dynamics in food webs. Santa Fe Institute studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 325–347
Monteil C, Deconchat M, Balent G (2005) Simple neural network reveals unexpected patterns of bird species richness in forest fragments. Landsc Ecol 20:513–527
Montoya JM, Pimm SL, Sole RV (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442:259–264
Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev Soc Ind Appl Math 45:167–256
Newman MEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8577–8582
Norris AR (2007) The responses of two cavity-nesting species to changes in habitat condition and nest web community dynamics in interior British Columbia. MSc thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Özesmi SL, Özesmi U (1999) An artificial neural network approach to spatial habitat modeling with interspecific interaction. Ecol Model 116:15–31
Paine RT (1980) Food webs: linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure. J Anim Ecol 49:667–685
Palmer MA, Ambrose RF, Poff NL (1997) Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 5:291–300
Pascual M, Dunne JA, Levin SA (2006) Challenges for the future: integrating ecological structure and dynamics. In: Pascual M, Dunne JA (eds) Ecological networks: linking structure and dynamics in food webs. Santa Fe Institute studies in the sciences of complexity. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 351–371
Pimm SL (2003) Food webs. University Chicago Press, Chicago
Pimm SL, Lawton JH, Cohen JE (1991) Food web patterns and their consequences. Nature 350:669–674
Proulx SR, Promislow DEL, Phillips PC (2005) Network thinking in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 20:345–353
Recknagel F (2001) Applications of machine learning to ecological modeling. Ecol Model 146:303–310
Soulé ME, Estes JE, Berger J, del Rio CM (2003) Ecological effectiveness: conservation goals for interactive species. Conserv Biol 17:1238–1250
Thompson JN (2006) Mutualistic webs of species. Science 312:372–373
USFWS (2003) Recovery plan for the red-cockaded woodpecker (P. borealis): second revision. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta
Walters JR, Haas CA, Blanc LA, Bishop DC, Kowalsky J, Gorman T (2006) Studies of the longleaf pine ecosystem on Eglin Air Force Base, Florida: endangered species management and community interactions. Project final report submitted to Natural Resources Management Branch, Eglin Air Force Base, Niceville
Watts DJ (2004) The “new” science of networks. Annu Rev Sociol 30:243–270
Wesołowski T (2007) Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest. J Ornithol (Epub ahead of print) doi:10.1007/s10336–007–0198-1
Acknowledgments
Funding for this study was provided by DOD. Threatened & Endangered Species funds from Eglin Air Force Base and a National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant (0508656). We thank T. Wesołowski and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We also thank Kathy Martin and Tomasz Wesołowski for organizing the International Ornithological Congress symposium on hole-nesting passerines, bringing together research on cavity-nesters from around the world, and stimulating thought-provoking conversations about future research directions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by F. Bairlein.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blanc, L.A., Walters, J.R. Cavity-nesting community webs as predictive tools: where do we go from here?. J Ornithol 148 (Suppl 2), 417–423 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0232-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-007-0232-3