Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing 1/2011

01.02.2011 | Research Report

The Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB): a new outlook on usability evaluation

verfasst von: Simone Borsci, Alessandro Londei, Stefano Federici

Erschienen in: Cognitive Processing | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The value of λ is one of the main issues debated in international usability studies. The debate is centred on the deficiencies of the mathematical return on investment model (ROI model) of Nielsen and Landauer (1993). The ROI model is discussed in order to identify the base of another model that, respecting Nielsen and Landauer’s one, tries to consider a large number of variables for the estimation of the number of evaluators needed for an interface. Using the bootstrap model (Efron 1979), we can take into account: (a) the interface properties, as the properties at zero condition of evaluation and (b) the probability that the population discovery behaviour is represented by all the possible discovery behaviours of a sample. Our alternative model, named Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB), provides an alternative estimation of the number of experts and users needed for a usability evaluation. Two experimental groups of users and experts are involved in the evaluation of a website (http://​www.​serviziocivile.​it). Applying the BDB model to the problems identified by the two groups, we found that 13 experts and 20 users are needed to identify 80% of usability problems, instead of 6 experts and 7 users required according to the estimation of the discovery likelihood provided by the ROI model. The consequence of the difference between the results of those models is that in following the BDB the costs of usability evaluation increase, although this is justified considering that the results obtained have the best probability of representing the entire population of experts and users.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Fußnoten
1
Actually, only Nielsen et al. (1993) used λ, instead of p (Lewis 1994; 2006; Virzi 1992; Wright and Monk 1991; Schmettow 2008) in the formula 1, partly because they derived their formula from the “Poisson process” (see Nielsen and Landauer 1993). Many authors (Lewis 1994; 2006; Virzi 1992; Wright and Monk 1991; Schmettow 2008) use the formula (1) written as: P = 1 – (1 – p) n, where “P” is the total number of problems in the interface, “p” the probability of finding the average usability problem when running a single average subject test and “n” is the number of participants.
 
2
In the review phase of this work, a reviewer claimed that “The authors should do a Monte Carlo resampling exercise to assess the extent to which randomly selected sets of 6 experts (for the CW data) and 7 users (for the TA data) find or fail to find at least 80% of the problems discovered by the full samples,” since, according to the reviewer’s opinion, “The authors simply state the different sample size estimates and appear to assume that the BDB are correct without further, evaluation or any tests of significance”. In accordance with the reviewer’s suggestions, we have added this section.
 
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Bellman JR, Park CW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J Consum Res 7(3):234–248CrossRef Bellman JR, Park CW (1980) Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: a protocol analysis. J Consum Res 7(3):234–248CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Bettman JR (1979) An information processing theory of consumer choice. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge Bettman JR (1979) An information processing theory of consumer choice. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge
Zurück zum Zitat Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1982a) Experiences with the Bettman-park verbal-protocol coding scheme. J Consum Res 8(4):442–448CrossRef Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1982a) Experiences with the Bettman-park verbal-protocol coding scheme. J Consum Res 8(4):442–448CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1982b) Information-presentation format and learning goals as determinants of consumers’ memory retrieval and choice processes. J Consum Res 8(4):431–441CrossRef Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1982b) Information-presentation format and learning goals as determinants of consumers’ memory retrieval and choice processes. J Consum Res 8(4):431–441CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1986) Consumers’ use of memory and external information in choice: Macro and micro perspectives. J Consum Res 12(4):382–405CrossRef Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1986) Consumers’ use of memory and external information in choice: Macro and micro perspectives. J Consum Res 12(4):382–405CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1989) The effects of concurrent verbalization on choice processing. J Mark Res 26(1):84–96CrossRef Biehal G, Chakravarti D (1989) The effects of concurrent verbalization on choice processing. J Mark Res 26(1):84–96CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Borsci S, Federici S (2009) The partial concurrent thinking aloud: a new usability evaluation technique for blind users. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A-L (eds) Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments—AAATE 2009, vol 25. Assistive technology research series. IOS Press, Florence, pp 421–425. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-042-1-421 Borsci S, Federici S (2009) The partial concurrent thinking aloud: a new usability evaluation technique for blind users. In: Emiliani PL, Burzagli L, Como A, Gabbanini F, Salminen A-L (eds) Assistive technology from adapted equipment to inclusive environments—AAATE 2009, vol 25. Assistive technology research series. IOS Press, Florence, pp 421–425. doi:10.​3233/​978-1-60750-042-1-421
Zurück zum Zitat Fox J (2002) An r and s-plus companion to applied regression. SAGE, California Fox J (2002) An r and s-plus companion to applied regression. SAGE, California
Zurück zum Zitat Goodstein RL (1963) Boolean algebra. Pergamon Press, Oxford Goodstein RL (1963) Boolean algebra. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Zurück zum Zitat Green A (1995) Verbal protocol analysis. Psychologist 8(3):126–129 Green A (1995) Verbal protocol analysis. Psychologist 8(3):126–129
Zurück zum Zitat Kuusela H, Pallab P (2000) A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol 113(3):387–404CrossRefPubMed Kuusela H, Pallab P (2000) A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. Am J Psychol 113(3):387–404CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kuusela H, Spence MT, Kanto AJ (1998) Expertise effects on prechoice decision processes and final outcomes: A protocol analysis. Eur J Mark 32(5/6):559CrossRef Kuusela H, Spence MT, Kanto AJ (1998) Expertise effects on prechoice decision processes and final outcomes: A protocol analysis. Eur J Mark 32(5/6):559CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis JR (1994) Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations. Hum Factors 36(2):368–378PubMed Lewis JR (1994) Sample sizes for usability studies: additional considerations. Hum Factors 36(2):368–378PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis JR (2001) Evaluation of procedures for adjusting problem-discovery rates estimated from small samples. Int J Hum Comput Interact 13(4):445–479CrossRef Lewis JR (2001) Evaluation of procedures for adjusting problem-discovery rates estimated from small samples. Int J Hum Comput Interact 13(4):445–479CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen J, Landauer TK A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT ‘93 and CHI ‘93 Conference on human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, 24–29 Apr 1993. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 206–213 Nielsen J, Landauer TK A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT ‘93 and CHI ‘93 Conference on human factors in computing systems, Amsterdam, 24–29 Apr 1993. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 206–213
Zurück zum Zitat Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) (1994) Usability inspection methods.Wiley, New York Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) (1994) Usability inspection methods.Wiley, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Rieman J, Franzke M, Redmiles D Usability evaluation with the cognitive walkthrough. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, United States, 1995. ACM, 223735, pp 387–388. doi:10.1145/223355.223735 Rieman J, Franzke M, Redmiles D Usability evaluation with the cognitive walkthrough. In: Conference companion on human factors in computing systems, Denver, Colorado, United States, 1995. ACM, 223735, pp 387–388. doi:10.​1145/​223355.​223735
Zurück zum Zitat Schmettow M Heterogeneity in the usability evaluation process. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: culture, creativity, interaction—Volume 1, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2008. British Computer Society, 1531527, pp 89–98 Schmettow M Heterogeneity in the usability evaluation process. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: culture, creativity, interaction—Volume 1, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2008. British Computer Society, 1531527, pp 89–98
Zurück zum Zitat Spool J, Schroeder W Testing web sites: Five users is nowhere near enough. In: CHI ‘01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, 2001. ACM, 634236, pp 285–286. doi:10.1145/634067.634236 Spool J, Schroeder W Testing web sites: Five users is nowhere near enough. In: CHI ‘01 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Seattle, Washington, 2001. ACM, 634236, pp 285–286. doi:10.​1145/​634067.​634236
Zurück zum Zitat Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J (2006) Determining usability test sample size, vol 2. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, Second edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J (2006) Determining usability test sample size, vol 2. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, Second edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Zurück zum Zitat Virzi RA (1990) Streamlining the design process: running fewer subjects. Human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting proceedings 34:291–294 Virzi RA (1990) Streamlining the design process: running fewer subjects. Human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting proceedings 34:291–294
Zurück zum Zitat Virzi RA (1992) Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 34(4):457–468 Virzi RA (1992) Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough? Hum Factors 34(4):457–468
Zurück zum Zitat Wharton C, Rieman J, Lewis C, Polson PG (1994) The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner’s guide. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York, pp 105–140 Wharton C, Rieman J, Lewis C, Polson PG (1994) The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner’s guide. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL (eds) Usability inspection methods. Wiley, New York, pp 105–140
Zurück zum Zitat Woolrych A, Cockton G Why and when five test users aren’t enough. In: Vanderdonckt J, Blandford A, Derycke A (eds) Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 conference, Toulouse, FR, 10–14 Sept 2001. Cépadčus Éditions, pp 105–108 Woolrych A, Cockton G Why and when five test users aren’t enough. In: Vanderdonckt J, Blandford A, Derycke A (eds) Proceedings of IHM-HCI 2001 conference, Toulouse, FR, 10–14 Sept 2001. Cépadčus Éditions, pp 105–108
Metadaten
Titel
The Bootstrap Discovery Behaviour (BDB): a new outlook on usability evaluation
verfasst von
Simone Borsci
Alessandro Londei
Stefano Federici
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Cognitive Processing / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1612-4782
Elektronische ISSN: 1612-4790
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-010-0376-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Cognitive Processing 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Neuer Inhalt