Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of stoniness and canopy properties on soil water content distribution: simulation of water movement in forest stony soil

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Forest Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mountainous forest soils usually contain a large number of rock fragments (particle diameter >2 mm), which influence soil properties. Data characterizing hydraulic properties of these soils usually describe only the fine soil fraction (particle diameter <2 mm) properties. To quantitatively describe soil water movement in stony soils, it is necessary to evaluate effective hydrophysical characteristics, involving the influence of stones, that is, the effective hydraulic conductivity and retention capacity should be known. Properties of evaporating surface (plant canopy) also play important role in formation of soil water movement and retention. This work presents results of the study of rock fragments (stoniness) effect on soil water content profiles and soil water dynamics during the season. Stony and homogeneous soil behavior is compared. The effect of different canopies (spruce forest, low vegetation) and bare soil in both types of soils on soil water dynamics is also studied. Stones as a part of soil are decreasing its water capacity and hydraulic conductivity as well. This is expressing in the decrease of stony soil water content retention capacity. High interception capacity of trees, followed by the low undercanopy precipitation, leads to the decreased soil water content of the upper soil layer. Combination of stony soil and dense forest canopy led to the low undercanopy precipitation, to relatively low infiltration totals into soil, and to decreased outflow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker FG, Bouma J (1976) Variability of hydraulic conductivity in two subsurface horizons of two silt loam soils. Soil Sci Soil Am J 40:219–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bärwolf M (2006) Soil properties. In: Measurements of Max Planck Institute for biogeochemistry at the Tatra windthrow sites. Jena, CD–ROM

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bičárová S, Fleischer P (2006) Concentration of ozone changes in boundary layer following windthrow in High Tatras in November 2004 In: Lapin M, Matejka F (ed) Proceedings of the international conference bioclimatology and water in the land. Comenius University, Bratislava, CD–ROM

  • Budagovskij AI, Novák V (2011a) Theory of evapotranspiration: 1.Transpiration and its quantitative description. J Hydrol Hydromech 59(1):3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budagovskij AI, Novák V (2011b) Theory of evapotranspiration: 2.Soil and intercepted water evaporation. J Hydrol Hydromech 59(2):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousin I, Nicollaud B, Coutadeur C (2003) Influence of rock fragments on the water retention and water percolation in a calcarleous soil. Catena 53:97–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dam JC van, Huygen J, Wesseling JG, Feddes RA, Kabat P, van Walsum PEV, Groenendijk P, van Diepen CA (1997) Theory of SWAP version 2.0. Simulation of water flow, solute transport and plant growth in the soil–water–atmosphere–plant environment. Report 71, Department of water resources, Wageningen Agricultural University. Technical document 45, DLO Winand Starring Centre, Wageningen

  • Gömöryová E, Střelcová K, Škvarenina J, Bebej J, Gömöry D (2008) The impact of windthrow and fire disturbances on selected soil properties in the Tatra National Park. Soil Water Res 3(1):574–580

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenther A, Zimmerman P, Harley P, Monson R, Fall R (1993) Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: model evaluation and sensitivity analysis. J Geophys Res 98:12609–12617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson CT, Blevins RL (1979) Soil water in coarse fragments. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43:819–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hraško J, Bedrna Z (1998) Applied soil science. Príroda, Bratislava, (In Slovak)

  • Hurtalová T, Matejka F, Rožnovský J, Marková I, Janouš D (2004) Aerodynamic parameter changes above a young spruce forest stand during five growing seasons. Contribut Geophys Geodesy 34(2):131–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer RJ, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schultze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kňava K, Novák V, Orfánus T, Majerčák J (2008) High Tatras forest structure changes and their influence on rain interception and some components of water balance. Contribut Geophys Geodesy 38(3):293–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutilek M, Nielsen DR (1994) Soil hydrology, Catena Verl., Cremlingen—Destedt

  • Lichner L (1994) K problematike merania nasýtenej hydraulickej vodivosti v pôde s makropórami. J Hydrol Hydromech 42:421–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerčák J, Novák V (1992) Simulation of the soil water dynamics in the root zone during the vegetation period. J Hydrol Hydromech 40(5):299–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Majerčáková O (1984) Interception as a loss–component in the process of runoff formation and its modelling. J Hydrol Hydromech 32(4):364–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák V (1987) Estimation of soil water extraction patterns by roots. Agric Water Manag 12:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novák V, Kňava K (2011) Determining the influence of stones on hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils, using numerical method. Geoderma 161:177–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novák V, Majerčák J (1992) Simulation of the soil water dynamics in the root zone during the vegetation period. J Hydrol Hydromech 40(5):380–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák V, Kňava K (2009) Soil hydrophysical characteristics of experimental site FIRE, High Tatras. In Pokalamitný výskum v TANAP-e, 2008 : Zborník príspevkov z III. seminára., Bratislava : Geofyzikálny ústav SAV : Výskumná stanica TANAP-u, ŠL TANAP, ISBN 978-80-85754-20-9, pp 165–171

  • Novák V, Šurda P (2010) The water retention of granite rock fragments in High Tatras stony soils. J Hydrol Hydromech 58(3):181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyonarte C, Escoriza I, Delgado R, Pinto V, Delgado G (1998) Water retention capacity in fine earth and gravel fractions of semiarid Mediterranean montane soils. Arid Land Res Manage 12:29–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttu K (1970) Radiation measurements above and in forest. Studia Forrestalia Suecica, Royal College of Forestry, Stockholm, No 72

  • Poesen J, Lavee H (1994) Rock fragments in top soils: significance and processes. Catena 23:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravina I, Magier J (1984) Hydraulic conductivity and water retention of clay soils containing coarse fragment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:736–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous media. Physics 1:318–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scurlock JMO, Asner GP, Gower ST (2001) Worldwide historical estimates of leaf area index, 1932–2000. Report. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennesee, ORNL/TM-2001/268, p 23

  • Šimůnek J, Huang K, Šejna M, van Genuchten Th M, Majerčák J, Novák V, and Šutor J (1998) The HYDRUS -ET software package for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat and multiple solutes in variably—saturated media. Version 1.1. Institute of Hydrology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, p 184

  • Šimůnek J, van Genuchten M Th, Šejna M (2006) The HYDRUS software package for simulating two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media, Technical manual, version 1.0, PC progress, Prague, Czech Republic

  • Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. UDSA—soil conservation service, Agriculture handbook, No 436

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A close form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vodálová A, Máliš F, Ištoňa J (2009) Development of vegetation on the sites with different state of forests disturbance after windthrow at Jamske Pleso. In: Pokalamitný výskum v TANAP-e, 2008, Zborník príspevkov z III. seminára., Bratislava, Geofyzikálny ústav SAV, Výskumná stanica TANAP-u, ŠL TANAP pp 257–268

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the Slovak Grant Agency APVV (Grant No. 51—030205) and VEGA (Project No. 2/0021/10) for partial support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viliam Novák.

Additional information

Communicated by Agustín Merino.

This article originates from the international symposium “Managed Forests in Future Landscapes. Implications for Water and Carbon Cycles (COST action FP 0601 FORMAN)”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Novák, V., Kňava, K. The influence of stoniness and canopy properties on soil water content distribution: simulation of water movement in forest stony soil. Eur J Forest Res 131, 1727–1735 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0589-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0589-y

Keywords

Navigation