Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Activities involving fauna monitoring are usually limited by the lack of resources; therefore, the choice of a proper and efficient methodology is fundamental to maximize the cost–benefit ratio. Both direct and indirect methods can be used to survey mammals, but the latter are preferred due to the difficulty to come in sight of and/or to capture the individuals, besides being cheaper. We compared the performance of two methods to survey medium and large-sized mammal: track plot recording and camera trapping, and their costs were assessed. At Jataí Ecological Station (S21°31'15"–W47°34'42"-Brazil) we installed ten camera traps along a dirt road directly in front of ten track plots, and monitored them for 10 days. We cleaned the plots, adjusted the cameras, and noted down the recorded species daily. Records taken by both methods showed they sample the local richness in different ways (Wilcoxon, T = 231; p ;; 0.01). The track plot method performed better on registering individuals whereas camera trapping provided records which permitted more accurate species identification. The type of infra-red sensor camera used showed a strong bias towards individual body mass (R 2 = 0.70; p = 0.017), and the variable expenses of this method in a 10-day survey were estimated about 2.04 times higher compared to track plot method; however, in a long run camera trapping becomes cheaper than track plot recording. Concluding, track plot recording is good enough for quick surveys under a limited budget, and camera trapping is best for precise species identification and the investigation of species details, performing better for large animals. When used together, these methods can be complementary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayres M, Ayres M Jr, Ayres DL, Santos AS (2003) BioStat 3.0. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá/MCT-CNPq. Belém, PA. Brasil

  • Barea-Azeón, JM, Virgós, E, Ballesteros-Duperón, E, Moleón, M, Chirosa, M (2007) Surveying carnivores at large spatial scales: a comparison of four broad-applied methods. Biodivers Conserv 16:1213–1230 doi:10.1007/s10531006-9114-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bider, JR (1968) Animal activity in uncontrolled terrestrial communities as determined by sand transect technique. Ecol Monogr 38:269–308 doi:10.2307/1948530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, C, Christie, S, Conforti, K, Coulson, T, Franklin, N, Ginsberg, JR et al (2001) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim Conserv 4:75–79 doi:10.1017/S1367943001001081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, C, Conforti, C, Coulson, T, Franklin, N, Ginsberg, JN, Griffiths, M et al (2002) The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: response to Jannelle et al. Anim Conserv 5:121–132 doi:10.1017/S1367943002002172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, TL, Swann, DE (1999) Using remote photography in wildlife ecology: a review. Wildl Soc Bull 27:571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, L (1997) Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. University of Chicago Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaidet-Drapier, N, Fritz, H, Bougarel, M, Renaud, PC, Poilecot, P, Chardonnet, P et al (2006) Cost and efficiency of large mammal census techniques: comparison of methods for a participatory approach in a communal area, Zimbabwe. Biol Conserv 15:735–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, RM, Roe, JD, Wangchuk, R, Hunter, DO (2006) Estimating snow leopard population abundance using photography and capture-recapture techniques. Wildl Soc Bull 34:772–781 doi:10.2193/00917648(2006)34[772:ESLPAU]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannelle, CS, Runge, MC, Mackenzie, DI (2002) The use os photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals: a comment on mislanding conclusions. Anim Conserv 5:119–120 doi:10.1017/S1367943002002160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C, McShea, WJ, Conroy, M, Kunz, TH (1996) Capturing mammals. In: Wilson, DE, Cole, FR, Nichols, JD, Rudran, R, Foster, MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution, USA, pp 115–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyra-Jorge MC, Ciocheti G, Pivello VR (2008) Carnivore mammals in a fragmented landscape in northeast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 17(7):1573–1580, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E (2003) Contabilidade e custos. Editora Atlas, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif, V, Tornberg, R (2006) Using time-lapse digital video recording for a nesting study of birds of prey. Eur J Wildl Res 52(4):251–258, December

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis NR (ed) (2006) Mamíferos do Brasil. Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná Brasil

  • Rudran, R, Kunz, TH, Jarman, SC, Smith, AP (1996) Observational techniques for nonvolant mammals. In: Wilson, DE, Cole, FR, Nichols, JD, Rudran, R, Foster, MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution, USA, pp 81–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadlier, LMJ, Webbon, CC, Backer, PJ, Harris, S (2004) Methods of monitoring re foxes Vulpes vulpes and badgers Meles meles: are field signs the answer? Mammal Rev 34:75–98 doi:10.1046/j.03051838.2003.00029.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibe, KM, Eichhorn, K, Wiesmayr, M, Schonert, B, Krone, O (2008) Long-term automatic video recording as a tool for analyzing the time patterns of utilization of predefined locations by wild animals. Eur J Wildl Res 54:53–59 doi:10.1007/s1034400701080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shida, CN (2005) Carcterização física do cerrado Pé-de-Gigante e uso das terras na região. Evolução do uso das terras na região. In: Pivello, VR, Varanda, EO (eds) Cerrado Pé-de-Gigante. Parque Estadual de Vassununga. Ecologia e Conservação. SEMA, São Paulo, pp 25–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Silveira L (1999) Ecologia e conservação dos mamíferos carnívoros do Parque Nacional das Emas, Goiás. MsC thesis. Universidade Federal de Goiás. Brazil

  • Silveira, L, Jácomo, AT, Diniz-Filho, JA (2003) Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation. Biol Conserv 114:351–355 doi:10.1016/S00063207(03)000636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smallwood, KS, Fitzhugh, EL (1995) A track count for estimating mountain lion Felis concolor californica population trends. Biol Conserv 71:251–259 doi:10.1016/00063207(94)00034-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srbek-Araújo, AC, Chiarello, AG (2005) Is camera-trapping an efficient method to surveying mammals in neotropical forest? J Trop Ecol 21:121–125 doi:10.1017/S0266467404001956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srbek-Araújo, AC, Chiarelo, AG (2007) Armadilhas fotográficas na amostragem de mamíferos: considerações metodológicas e comparação de equipamentos. Rev Bras Zool 24:647–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stander, PE (1998) Spoor counts as indices of large carnivores populations: the relationship between spoor frequency, sampling effort and true density. J Appl Ecol 35:378–385 doi:10.1046/j.13652664.1998.00313.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, DE, Hass, CC, Dalton, DC, Wolf, SA (2004) Infra-triggered cameras for detecting wildlife: an evaluation and review. Wildl Soc Bull 32:357–365 doi:10.2193/00917648(2004)32[357:ICFDWA]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas WM, Miranda GHB (2003) Uso de armadilhas fotográficas em levantamentos populacionais. In: Cullen Jr L, Rudran R, Valladares-Pádua C (eds). Métodos de estudo em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. Editora UFPR. pp 243–268

  • Trolle, M, Noss, AJ, Lima, E, De, S, Dalponte, JC (2007) Câmera-trap studies of maned wolf density in the Cerrado and the Pantanal of Brazil. Biol Conserv 16:1197–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, RS, Emmons, LH (1996) Mammalian diversity in neotropical lowland rainforest: a preliminary assessment. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 230:1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, P, Pokheral, C, Jnawali, SR (2004) Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies. Anim Conserv 7:251–256 doi:10.1017/S1367943004001441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wemmer, C, Kunz, T, Lundie-Jekins, G, McShea, W (1996) Mammalian Sign. In: Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R, Foster MS (eds) Measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Standard methods for mammals. Smithsonian Institution, USA, pp 157–176

    Google Scholar 

  • York, EC, Moruzzi, TL, Fuller, TK, Organ, JF, Sauvajot, RM, De Graff, R (2001) Description and evaluation of a remote camera and triggering system to monitor carnivores. Wildl Soc Bull 29:1228–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar, JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prencinton Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Msc. Milton Cezar Ribeiro and to Dr. Carlos Piña for the suggestions and to Dr. Valentine Lance for revising the text. We also thank NGC—Neotropical Grassland Conservancy and CNPQ—Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Tecnologia for financial support. This research was conducted according to Brazilian environmental laws and regulations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Carolina Lyra-Jorge.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Kierdorf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyra-Jorge, M.C., Ciocheti, G., Pivello, V.R. et al. Comparing methods for sampling large- and medium-sized mammals: camera traps and track plots. Eur J Wildl Res 54, 739–744 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0205-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0205-8

Keywords

Navigation