Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences

  • Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Railway ecology is an emerging discipline. In this review, we focus on what is known today regarding the impacts of railways on wildlife, and on the methods to identify, monitor, and mitigate these impacts. Wildlife-train collisions are the most often reported impact, although railway lines can also represent barriers to animal movement, bisecting populations or reducing wildlife access to resources. Little is known on the impact of habitat loss and fragmentation due to railways alone, or on their disturbance effects, including pollution (noise, chemical, light), and on the potential to provide habitat connectivity or surrogate habitats for native species in degraded landscapes. Molecular techniques are one of the most promising methods to study the impacts of railways, as genetic analyses are useful to identify both population sub-structuring, and to assess the potential restoration of functional connectivity by mitigation measures like wildlife passes, or to estimate effective population sizes. Field work is necessary to provide credible mortality rates, which, combined with computer simulations, can allow for estimations of the impact of mortality on population viability. Studies should ideally have Before-After-Control-Impact designs and be long-term. We need to improve mortality estimates, and to understand how impacts threaten population dynamics. We need to go from local-scale studies (e.g., animals use the underpasses) to landscape-scale (i.e., where to place these underpasses to maximize the connectivity at regional/populational levels). Finally, we need to expand our knowledge on less studied, less charismatic species, and to explore the potential environmental benefits of green practices on railway corridors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreassen HP, Gundersen H, Storaasthe T (2005) The effect of scent-marking, forest clearing and supplemental feeding on moose-train collisions. J Wildl Manag 69:1125–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascensão F, Capinha C (2017) Aliens on the move: transportation networks and non-native species. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, p 293–297

  • Babińska-Werka J, Krauze-Gryz D, Wasilewski M, Jasińska K (2015) Effectiveness of an acoustic wildlife warning device using natural calls to reduce the risk of train collisions with animals. Transp Res D 38:6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkenhol N, Waits LP (2009) Molecular road ecology: exploring the potential of genetics for investigating transportation impacts on wildlife. Mol Ecol 18:4151–4164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baofa Y, Huyin H, Yili Z, Le Z, Wanhong W (2006) Influence of the Qinghai-Tibetan railway and highway on the activities of wild animals. Acta Ecol Sin 26:3917–3923

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos R, Borda-de-Água L (2017) Railways as barriers for wildlife: current knowledge. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 43–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos R, Alonso JC, Ponce C, Palacín C (2011) Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of marked wire in reducing avian collisions with power lines. Conserv Biol 25:893–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos R, Borda-de-Água L, Brum P, Beja P, Pereira HM (2017) What’s next? Railway ecology in the 21st century. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 311–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos R, Martins RC, Ascensão F, D’Amico M, Moreira F, Borda-de-Água L (2018) A review of searcher efficiency and carcass persistency in infrastructure-driven mortality assessment studies. Biol Conserv 222:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartoszek J, Greenwald KR (2009) A population divided: railroad tracks as barriers to gene flow in an isolated population of marbled salamanders (Ambystoma opacum). Herpetol Conserv Biol 4:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya M, Primack RB, Gerwein J (2003) Are roads and railroads barriers to bumblebee movement in a temperate suburban conservation area? Biol Conserv 109:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda-de-Água L, Navarro L, Gavinhos C, Pereira HM (2011) Spatio-temporal impacts of roads on the persistence of populations: analytic and numerical approaches. Landsc Ecol 26(2):253–265

  • Borda-de-Água L, Grilo C, Pereira HM (2014) Modeling the impact of road mortality on barn owl (Tyto alba) populations using age-structured models. Ecol Model 276:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (2017a) Railway ecology. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) (2017b) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, p 316

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschi D, Garcia DA, Gugliermetti F, Cumo F (2015) Characterizing the fragmentation level of Italian’s National Parks due to transportation infrastructures. Transp Res D 36:18–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho F, Santos SM, Mira A, Lourenço RF (2017) Methods to monitor and mitigate wildlife mortality in railways. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceia-Hasse A, Borda-de-Água L, Grilo C, Pereira HM (2017) Global exposure of carnivores to roads. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26:592–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerboncini RAS, Roper JJ, Passos FC (2016) Edge effects without habitat fragmentation? Small mammals and a railway in the Atlantic Forest of southern Brazil. Oryx 50:460–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauzel C (2017) Evaluating and mitigating the impact of a high-speed railway on connectivity: a case study with an amphibian species in France. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 211–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauzel C, Girardet X, Foltête J-C (2013) Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. J Environ Manag 127:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger AP, Sawaya MA (2010) Piloting a non-invasive genetic sampling method for evaluating population-level benefits of wildlife crossing structures. Ecol Soc 15:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Clevenger AP, Waltho N (2005) Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals. Biol Conserv 121:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Corlatti L, Hackländer K, Frey-Roos F (2009) Ability of wildlife overpasses to provide connectivity and prevent genetic isolation. Conserv Biol 23:548–556

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunnington GM, Garrah E, Eberhardt E, Fahrig L (2014) Culverts alone do not reduce road mortality in anurans. Ecoscience 21:69–78

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amico AF, Fabrizio M, Barrientos R, Gortázar C (2018) Twenty years of road ecology: a topical collection looking forward for new perspectives. Eur J Wildl Res 64:26

    Google Scholar 

  • De Santo RS, Smith DG (1993) Environmental auditing: an introduction to issues of habitat fragmentation relative to transportation corridors with special reference to high-speed rail (HSR). Environ Manag 17:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey B, Olsson M, Rew LJ (2015) Ecological effects of railways on wildlife. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of road ecology. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, pp 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey B, Clevenger AP, Rew LJ (2017) Relative risk and variables associated with bear and ungulate mortalities along a railroad in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 135–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulac J (2013) Global land transport infrastructure requirements. Estimating road and railway infrastructure capacity and costs to 2050. International Energy Agency

  • Eriksson C (2014) Does tree removal along railroads in Sweden influence the risk of train accidents with moose and roe deer? Second cycle, A2E. Uppsala: Uppsala University

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 34:487–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2017) Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per se. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 48:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammini F (Ed.) (2012) Railway safety, reliability, and security: technologies and systems engineering: technologies and systems engineering. IGI Global.

  • Ford AT, Clevenger AP, Bennett A (2009) Comparison of methods of monitoring wildlife crossing-structures on highways. J Wildl Manag 73:1213–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangadharan A, Pollock S, Gilhooly P, Friesen A, Dorsey B, St. Clair CC (2017) Grain spilled from moving trains create a substantial wildlife attractant in protected areas. Anim Conserv 20:391–400

    Google Scholar 

  • García de la Morena EL, Malo JE, Hervás I, Mata C, González S, Morales R, Herranz J (2017) On-board video recording unravels bird behavior and mortality produced by high-speed trains. Front Ecol Evol 5:117

    Google Scholar 

  • Girvetz EH, James H, Thorne JH, Berry AM, Jaeger JAG (2008) Integration of landscape fragmentation analysis into regional planning: a statewide multi-scale case study from California, USA. Landsc Urban Plan 86:205–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinho C, Marques JT, Salgueiro P, Catarino L, Osório de Castro C, Mira A, Beja P (2017a) Bird collisions in a railway crossing a wetland of international importance (Sado estuary, Portugal). In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Godinho C, Catarino L, Marques JT, Mira A, Beja P (2017b) Assessing bird exclusion effect in a wetland crossed by a railway (Sado estuary, Portugal). In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen H, Andreassen HP, Storaas T (1998) Spatial and temporal correlates to Norwegian moose-train collisions. Alces 34:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddaway NR, Collins AM, Coughlin D, Kirk S (2015) The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PLoS One 10:e0138237

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heske EJ (2015) Blood on the tracks: track mortality and scavenging rate in urban nature preserves. Urban Nat 4:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu D, Fu J, Zou F, Qi Y (2012) Impact of the Qinghai-Tibet railway on population genetic structure of the toad-headed lizard, Phrynocephalus vlangalii. Asian Herpetol Res 3:280–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A, Dickens HJ, Whelan RJ (1987) Movement of mammals through tunnels under railway lines. Aust Zool 24:89–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Iosif R (2012) Railroad-associated mortality hot spots for a population of Romanian Hermann’s tortoise (Testudo hermanni boettgeri): a gravity model for railroad-segment analysis. Procedia Environ Sci 14:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito TY, Lhagvasuren B, Tsunekawa A, Shinoda M (2017) Habitat fragmentation by railways as a barrier to great migrations of ungulates in Mongolia. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Iuell B, Bekker GJ, Cuperus R, Dufek J, Fry G, Hicks C, Hlavac V, Keller V, Rosell C, Sangwine T, Torslov N, Wandall BLM (2003) Wildlife and traffic: a European handbook for identifying conflicts and designing solutions. KNNV Publishers, Utrech

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger JAG, Schwarz-von Raumer H-G, Esswein H, Müller M, Schmidt-Lüttmann M (2007) Time series of landscape fragmentation caused by transportation infrastructure and urban development: a case study from Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Ecol Soc 12:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaren V, Andersen R, Ulleberg M, Pedersen PH, Wiseth B (1991) Moose–train collisions: the effects of vegetation removal with a cost-benefit analysis. Alces 27:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalarus K, Bąkowski M (2015) Railway tracks can have great value for butterflies as a new alternative habitat. Ital J Zool 82:565–572

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammonen J (2015) Foraging behaviour of Myotis mystacinus and M. brandtii in relation to a big road and railway in southcentral Sweden. Bachelor’s thesis. Uppsala: Uppsala University

  • Keken Z, Kušta T (2017) Railway ecology—experiences and examples in the Czech Republic. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornilev YV, Price SJ, Dorcas ME (2006) Between a rock and a hard place: responses of eastern box turtles (Terrapene carolina) when trapped between railroad tracks. Herpetol Rev 37:145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Ge C, Li J, Li Y, Xu A, Zhou K, Xue D (2010) Ground-dwelling birds near the Qinghai-Tibet highway and railway. Transp Res D 15:525–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas PS, Gomes de Carvalho R, Grilo C (2017) Railway disturbances on wildlife: types, effects and mitigation measures. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 81–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo JE, García de la Morena EL, Hervás I, Mata C, Herranz J (2016) Uncapped tubular poles along high-speed railway lines act as pitfall traps for cavity nesting birds. Eur J Wildl Res 62:483–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Malo JE, García de Morena E, Hervás I, Mata C, Herranz J (2017) Cross-scale changes in bird behaviour around a high speed railway: from landscape occupation to infrastructure use and collision risk. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateus ARA, Grilo C, Santos-Reis M (2011) Surveying drainage culvert use by carnivores: sampling design and cost–benefit analyzes of track-pads vs. video-surveillance methods. Environ Monit Assess 181:101–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morelli F, Beim M, Jerzak L, Jones D, Tryjanowski P (2014) Can roads, railways and related structures have positive effects on birds? A review. Transp Res D 30:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroń D, Skórka P, Lenda M, Rożej-Pabijan E, Wantuch M, Kajzer-Bonk J, Celary W, Mielczarek LE, Tryjanowski P (2014) Railway embankments as new habitat for pollinators in an agricultural landscape. PLoS One 9:e101297

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moroń D, Skórka P, Lenda M, Celary W, Tryjanowski P (2017) Railway lines affect spatial turnover of pollinator communities in an agricultural landscape. Divers Distrib 23:1090–1097

    Google Scholar 

  • Múrias T, Gonçalves D, Lopes RJ (2017) Evaluating the impacts of a new railway on shorebirds: a case study in Central Portugal (Aveiro Lagoon). In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 193–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MH, Fassina S, Hopkins JB III, Whittington J, St. Clair CC (2017) Seasonal and individual variation in the use of rail-associated food attractants by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in a national park. PLoS One 12:e0175658

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Newsome TM, van Eeden LM (2017) Food waste is still an underappreciated threat to wildlife. Anim Conserv 20:405–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson KA, van der Ree R (2015) Railways, roads and fences across Kazakhistan and Mongolia threaten the survival of wide-ranging wildlife. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of road ecology. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, pp 472–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier SK, Carlson L, Nein D, Roy RD (2006) Railroad crossing structures for spotted turtles: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority—Greenbush rail line wildlife crossing demonstration project. In Irwin CL, Garrett P, McDermott KP (Editors). Proceedings of the 2005 International conference on ecology and transportation (pp. 414–425). Raleigh: North Carolina State University

  • Pérez-Espona S, Pérez-Barbería FJ, Mcleod JE, Jiggins CD, Gordon IJ, Pemberton JM (2008) Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer (Cervus elaphus). Mol Ecol 17:981–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock SZ, Nielsen SE, St. Clair CC (2017) A railway increases the abundance and accelerates the phenology of bear-attracting plants in a forested, mountain park. Ecosphere 8: e01985. wildlife, but at what cost ? Ani m. Conserv. 20,403–40 4

  • Popp JN (2017) Railways offer grain on a silver platter to wildlife, but at what cost? Anim Conserv 20:403–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp JN, Boyle SP (2017) Railway ecology: underrepresented in science? Basic Appl Ecol 19:84–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Popp JN, Hamr J (2018) Seasonal use of railways by wildlife. Diversity 10:104

    Google Scholar 

  • Prass M, Vrezec A, Setälä H, Kotze DJ (2017) The matrix affects carabid assemblages in linear urban ruderal habitats. Urban Ecosyst 20:971–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Profillidis VA (2014) Railway management and engineering. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Prunier JG, Kaufmann B, Léna J-P, Fenet S, Pompanon F, Joly P (2014) A 40-year-old divided highway does not prevent gene flow in the alpine newt Ichthyosaura alpestris. Conserv Genet 15:453–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautsaw RM, Martin SA, Vincent BA, Lanctot K, Bolt MR, Seigel RA, Parkinson CL (2018) Stopped dead in their tracks: the impact of railways on gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) movement and behavior. Copeia 106:135–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM, York EC, Bromley C, Fuller TK, Wayne RK (2006) A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Mol Ecol 15:1733–1741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Crema G, Delibes M (1996) Use of non-wildlife passages across a high speed railway by terrestrial vertebrates. J Appl Ecol 33:1527–1540

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez A, Crema G, Delibes M (1997) Factors affecting crossing of red foxes and wildcats through non-wildlife passages across a high-speed railway. Ecography 20:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez JJ, García de la Morena E, González D (2008) Estudio de las medidas correctoras para reducir las colisiones de aves con ferrocarriles de alta velocidad. Centro de Estudios y Experimentación, Ministerio de Fomento, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy M, Sukumar R (2017) Railways and wildlife: a case study of train-elephant collisions in northern West Bengal, India. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 155–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytwinski T, Soanes K, Jaeger JAG, Fahrig L, Scott Findlay C, Houlahan J, van der Ree R, van der Grift EA (2016) How effective is road mitigation at reducing road-kill? A meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0166941

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Santos SM, Lourenço RF, Carvalho F (2017) Current knowledge on wildlife mortality in railways. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Werning B, Thompson D, Gautier P-E, Hanson C, Hemsworth B, Nelson J, Maeda T, de Vos P (2008) Noise and vibration mitigation for rail transportation systems: proceedings of the 9th international Workshop on Railway Noise, Munich, Germany, 4–8 September 2007. Springer

  • Seiler A, Olsson M (2017) Wildlife deterrent methods for railways—an experimental study. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 273–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabana AA, Zaazaa KE, Sugiyama H (2008) Railroad vehicle dynamics: a computational approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva Lucas P, Gomes de Carvalho R, Grilo C (2017) Railway disturbances on wildlife: types, effects, and mitigation measures. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JM, Sunnucks P, Taylor AC, van der Ree R (2010) Beyond roadkill, radiotracking, recapture and FST—a review of some genetic methods to improve understanding of the influence of roads on wildlife. Ecol Soc 15:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RA (1998) Global environmental challenges and railway transport. Japan Railway Transp Rev 18:4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RA (2003) Railways: how they may contribute to a sustainable future. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 217:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DJ, van der Ree D, Rosell C (2015) Wildlife crossing structures: an effective strategy to restore or maintain wildlife connectivity across roads. In: van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) Handbook of road ecology. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, pp 172–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Soanes K, Lobo MC, Vesk PA, McCarthy MA, Moore JL, van der Ree R (2013) Movement re-established but not restored: inferring the effectiveness of road-crossing mitigation for a gliding mammal by monitoring use. Biol Conserv 159:434–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Soanes K, Taylor AC, Sunnucks P, Vesk PA, Cesarini S, van der Ree R (2017) Evaluating the success of wildlife crossing structures using genetic approaches and an experimental design: lessons from a gliding mammal. J Appl Ecol 55:129–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor BD, Goldingay RL (2009) Can road-crossing structures improve population viability of an urban gliding mammal? Ecol Soc 14:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay MA, St. Clair CC (2009) Factors affecting the permeability of transportation and riparian corridors to the movements of songbirds in an urban landscape. J Appl Ecol 46:1314–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Grift EA (1999) Mammals and railroads: impacts and management implications. Lutra 42:77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ree R, Heinze D, McCarthy M, Mansergh I (2009) Wildlife tunnel enhances population viability. Ecol Soc 14:7

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Ree R, Smith DJ, Grilo C (eds) (2015) Handbook of road ecology. John Wiley and Sons, West Sussex, p 522

    Google Scholar 

  • van Why KR, Chamberlain MJ (2003) Mortality of black bears, Ursus americanus, associated with elevated train trestles. Can Field-Nat 117:113–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandevelde J-C, Penone C (2017) Ecological roles of railways in anthropogenic landscapes: a synthesis of five case studies in Northern France. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandevelde J-C, Bouhours A, Julien J-F, Couvet D, Kerbiriou C (2014) Activity of European common bats along railway verges. Ecol Eng 64:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller JS (2017) Commerce and conservation in the crown of the continent. In: Borda-de-Água L, Barrientos R, Beja P, Pereira HM (eds) Railway ecology. Springer, Cham, pp 289–306

  • Waterman E, Tulp I, Reijnen R, Krijgsveld K, Braak C (2002) Disturbance of meadow birds by railway noise in The Netherlands. Geluid 1:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiącek J, Polak M, Filipiuk M, Kucharczyk M, Bohatkiewicz J (2015) Do birds avoid railroads as has been found for roads? Environ Manag 56:643–652

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2015) https://data.worldbank.org/

  • Xia L, Yang Q, Li Z, Wu Y, Feng Z (2007) The effect of the Qinghai-Tibet railway on the migration of Tibetan antelope Pantholops hodgsonii in Hoh-xil National Nature Reserve, China. Oryx 41:352–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanes M, Velasco JM, Suaréz F (1995) Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: the importance of culverts. Biol Conserv 71:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Xia L (2008) Tibetan wildlife is getting used to the railway. Nature 452:810–811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J, Jiang Z, Zeng Y, Turghan M, Fang H, Li C (2011) Effect of anthropogenic landscape features on population genetic differentiation of Przewalski’s gazelle: main role of human settlement. PLoS One 6:e20144

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zuberogoitia I, del Real J, Torres JJ, Rodríguez L, Alonso M, de Alba V, Azahara C, Zabala J (2015) Testing pole barriers as feasible mitigation measure to avoid bird vehicle collisions (BVC). Ecol Eng 83:144–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Infraestruturas de Portugal Biodiversity Chair. We thank João Morais Sarmento, Ana Cristina Martins, Cândida Osório de Castro, Graça Garcia, and Luísa Vales de Almeida without whom this work would not have been possible. We thank two anonymous reviewers for the improvements in a previous version of this manuscript.

Funding

RB, FA, HMP, and LBA acknowledge financial support by the Infraestruturas de Portugal Biodiversity Chair - CIBIO - Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources. RB was supported by a Postdoctoral del Plan Propio from Universidad de Alcalá and FA by an FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) postdoctoral grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIBIO/InBio, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal

    Rafael Barrientos, Fernando Ascensão, Pedro Beja, Henrique M. Pereira & Luís Borda-de-Água

  2. CEABN/InBio, Centro de Ecologia Aplicada “Professor Baeta Neves”, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal

    Rafael Barrientos, Fernando Ascensão, Pedro Beja, Henrique M. Pereira & Luís Borda-de-Água

  3. University of Alcalá, Carretera Madrid-Barcelona km. 33.6, 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Spain

    Rafael Barrientos

  4. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Henrique M. Pereira

Authors
  1. Rafael Barrientos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fernando Ascensão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pedro Beja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Henrique M. Pereira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luís Borda-de-Água
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Barrientos.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Road Ecology

Guest Editor: Marcello D’Amico

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrientos, R., Ascensão, F., Beja, P. et al. Railway ecology vs. road ecology: similarities and differences. Eur J Wildl Res 65, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1248-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-018-1248-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation