Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interpretation of shear strength uncertainty and reliability analyses of slopes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landslides Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variance of the friction angle or friction coefficient (tan ϕ) is often considered in geotechnical reliability analyses, which implies that the variance of the shear strength as defined by a Mohr-Coulomb envelope increases as the normal stress on the shearing surface increases. However, shear strength data sometimes has approximately constant variance, and most simple regression techniques assume constant variance. Four effective stress shear strength data sets are evaluated using both the constant variance (homoscedastic) and constant coefficient of variation (heteroscedastic) interpretations. The impact of the variance interpretation on slope stability is evaluated using infinite slope, homogeneous dam, and zoned dam examples. For relatively shallow infinite slope surfaces, the reliability index for the heteroscedastic interpretation of shear strength variance was about twice the reliability index obtained using the homoscedastic approach. In the dam examples, the difference in the reliability indices resulting from the heteroscedastic and homoscedastic interpretations was about one, indicating a tenfold increase in the probability of failure. The typical assumption of constant coefficient of variation of shear strength may result in unconservative estimates of the reliability of shallow failure surfaces and overly conservative results for deeper failure surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baecher GB, Christian JT (2003) Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. Wiley, Hoboken, 605 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker R (2004) Nonlinear Mohr envelopes based on triaxial data. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 5(498):498–506. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker DE (1996) Eighteenth Canadian geotechnical colloquium: limit states design for foundations. Part II. Development for the National Building Code of Canada. Can Geotech J 33:984–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box GEP (1954) The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: some general considerations and examples. Biometrics 10(1):16–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugger RM (1969) A note on unbiased estimation of the standard deviation. Am Stat 23(4):32

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini C (2000a) Probabilistic approach to the design of anchored sheet pile walls. Comput Geotech 26:309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini C (2000b) Reliability evaluation of shallow foundation bearing capacity on c’, ϕ’ soils. Can Geotech J 37:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies OL, Pearson ES (1934) Methods of estimating from samples the population standard deviation. Suppl J R Stat Soc 1(1):76–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM (2000) Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(4):307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J. M. (2004) Friction angles for sand, gravel, and rockfill, Kenneth L. Lee Memorial Lecture, Long Beach, CA, April 28, 2004

  • Duncan JM, Wright SG, Brandon TL (2014) Soil strength and slope stability, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, 317 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurland J, Tripathi RC (1971) A simple approximation for unbiased estimation of the standard deviation. Am Stat 25(4):30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasofer AM, Lind NC (1974) An exact and invariant first-order reliability format. J Eng Mech Div 100(EM1):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Hata Y, Ichii K, Tokida K (2012) A probabilistic evaluation of the size of earthquake induced slope failure for an embankment. Georisk: Assessment and Management of risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 6(2):73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman WH (1950) The unbiased estimate of the population variance and standard deviation. Am J Psychol 63(4):615–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang J-C, Baker R, Yamagami T (2003) The effect of strength envelope nonlinearity on slope stability computations. Can Geotech J 40:308–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JM, Lovell CW (1979) The effect of laboratory compaction on the shear behavior of a highly plastic clay after saturation and consolidation: Int. Rep., Publ, FHWA/IN/JHRP-79/07, JHRP, INDOT and Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN

  • Kulhawy FH, Roth MJS, Grigoriu MD (1991) Some statistical evaluations of geotechnical properties, Proceedings of ICASP6, Mexico City, Mexico, 705–712

  • Lacasse, S. and Nadim, F. (1996) Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties, Uncertainty in the geologic environment: from theory to practice: proceedings of Uncertainty ‘96, Madison, Wisconsin, 49–75

  • Low BK, Tang WH (1997) Efficient reliability evaluation using spreadsheet. J Eng Mech 123(7):749–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb P (1966) The variability of natural soils. Can Geotech J 3(2):74–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumb P (1970) Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Can Geotech J 7(3):225–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH (1999) Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can Geotech J 36:612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JD, Polanco L (2012) Reliability-based underseepage analysis in levees using a response surface-Monte Carlo simulation method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(7):821–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocscience, Inc. (2016) Slide v7.0-2D limit equilibrium slope stability analysis, Toronto

  • Schnabel Engineering Inc. (2013a) CU Test Results, Proposed Embankment Core Material, Cobbs Creek Dam, 46 pp

  • Schnabel Engineering Inc. (2013b) CU Test Results, Proposed Embankment Shell Material, Cobbs Creek Dam, 96 pp

  • Schultze E (1971) Frequency distributions and correlations of soil properties, Proceedings of 1st ICASP, Hong Kong, 371–387

  • Schultze E (1975) Some aspects concerning the application of statistics and probability to foundations, Proceedings of 2nd ICASP, Aachen, Germany, 457–494

  • Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Lee KL (1970) Variability in soil parameters, Proceedings 8th Annual Engineering Geology and Soils Engineering Symposium, Idaho, 159–185

  • Sleep MD, Duncan JM (2014) Manual for Geotechnical Engineering Reliability Calculations, 2nd edition, CGPR #76. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 75 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique 17(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VandenBerge DR, Duncan JM, Brandon TL (2015) Consolidated-Undrained Strength of Compacted Clay, CGPR #83, Center for Geotechnical Practice and Research. Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 128 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu XZ (2013) Trivariate analysis of soil ranking-correlated characteristics and its application to probabilistic stability assessments in geotechnical engineering problems. Soils Found 53(4):540–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Zuo S, Lin Y, Li L, Zhang Y (2016) Reliability back analysis of shear strength parameters of landslide with three-dimensional upper bound limit analysis theory. Landslides 13:711–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Rocscience for the academic version of Slide 7.0 used to perform the slope stability analyses presented in this paper. Schnabel Engineering Inc. is also acknowledged for providing access to the Cobbs Creek dam testing data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lafayette College, Easton, PA, 18042, USA

    Michael P. McGuire

  2. Tennessee Tech, Cookeville, TN, 38505, USA

    Daniel R. VandenBerge

Authors
  1. Michael P. McGuire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel R. VandenBerge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael P. McGuire.

Electronic supplementary material

Online Resource 1

(XLSX 16 kb)

Online Resource 2

(XLSX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGuire, M.P., VandenBerge, D.R. Interpretation of shear strength uncertainty and reliability analyses of slopes. Landslides 14, 2059–2072 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0836-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0836-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation